Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in COVID-19 management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of acute COVID-19 is still under investigation, with conflicting results reported from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Different dosing regimens may have contributed to the contradictory findings. OBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Jiawen, Rayner, Daniel, Ramaraju, Harikrishnaa B., Abbas, Umaima, Garcia, Cristian, Heybati, Kiyan, Zhou, Fangwen, Huang, Emma, Park, Ye-Jean, Moskalyk, Myron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.01.010
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of acute COVID-19 is still under investigation, with conflicting results reported from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Different dosing regimens may have contributed to the contradictory findings. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SSRIs and the effect of different dosing regimens on the treatment of acute COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: Seven databases were searched from January 2020 to December 2022. Trial registries, previous reviews, and preprint servers were hand-searched. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs and observational studies with no language restrictions. PARTICIPANTS: COVID-19 inpatients/outpatients. INTERVENTIONS: SSRIs prescribed after diagnosis were compared against a placebo or standard of care. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Risk of bias was rated using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials version 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Outcomes were mortality, hospitalization, composite of hospitalization/emergency room visits, hypoxemia, requirement for supplemental oxygen, ventilator support, and serious adverse events. RCT data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Observational findings were narratively described. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of SSRI dose, and sensitivity analyses were performed excluding studies with a high risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Six RCTs (N = 4197) and five observational studies (N = 1156) were included. Meta-analyses associated fluvoxamine with reduced mortality (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63–0.82) and hospitalization (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64–0.99) on the basis of moderate quality of evidence. Medium-dose fluvoxamine (100 mg twice a day) was associated with reduced mortality, hospitalization, and composite of hospitalization/emergency room visits, but low-dose fluvoxamine (50 mg twice a day) was not. Fluvoxamine was not associated with increased serious adverse events. Observational studies support the use of fluvoxamine and highlight fluoxetine as a possible alternative to SSRIs for the treatment of COVID-19. DISCUSSION: Fluvoxamine remains a candidate pharmacotherapy for treating COVID-19 in outpatients. Medium-dose fluvoxamine may be preferable over low-dose fluvoxamine.