Cargando…

Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the interest in implementing mobile health (mHealth) in population-based health studies, but evidence is lacking on engagement and adherence in studies. We conducted a fully remote study for ≥6 months tracking COVID-19 digital biomarkers and symptoms usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rennie, Kirsten L, Lawlor, Emma R, Yassaee, Arrash, Booth, Adam, Westgate, Kate, Sharp, Stephen J, Tyrrell, Carina S B, Aral, Mert, Wareham, Nicholas J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9842396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194866
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40602
_version_ 1784870114921807872
author Rennie, Kirsten L
Lawlor, Emma R
Yassaee, Arrash
Booth, Adam
Westgate, Kate
Sharp, Stephen J
Tyrrell, Carina S B
Aral, Mert
Wareham, Nicholas J
author_facet Rennie, Kirsten L
Lawlor, Emma R
Yassaee, Arrash
Booth, Adam
Westgate, Kate
Sharp, Stephen J
Tyrrell, Carina S B
Aral, Mert
Wareham, Nicholas J
author_sort Rennie, Kirsten L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the interest in implementing mobile health (mHealth) in population-based health studies, but evidence is lacking on engagement and adherence in studies. We conducted a fully remote study for ≥6 months tracking COVID-19 digital biomarkers and symptoms using a smartphone app nested within an existing cohort of adults. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate participant characteristics associated with initial and sustained engagement in digital biomarker collection from a bespoke smartphone app and if engagement changed over time or because of COVID-19 factors and explore participants’ reasons for consenting to the smartphone substudy and experiences related to initial and continued engagement. METHODS: Participants in the Fenland COVID-19 study were invited to the app substudy from August 2020 to October 2020 until study closure (April 30, 2021). Participants were asked to complete digital biomarker modules (oxygen saturation, body temperature, and resting heart rate [RHR]) and possible COVID-19 symptoms in the app 3 times per week. Participants manually entered the measurements, except RHR that was measured using the smartphone camera. Engagement was categorized by median weekly frequency of completing the 3 digital biomarker modules (categories: 0, 1-2, and ≥3 times per week). Sociodemographic and health characteristics of those who did or did not consent to the substudy and by engagement category were explored. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 35 participants who were purposively sampled by sex, age, educational attainment, and engagement category, and data were analyzed thematically; 63% (22/35) of the participants consented to the app substudy, and 37% (13/35) of the participants did not consent. RESULTS: A total of 62.61% (2524/4031) of Fenland COVID-19 study participants consented to the app substudy. Of those, 90.21% (2277/2524) completed the app onboarding process. Median time in the app substudy was 34.5 weeks (IQR 34-37) with no change in engagement from 0 to 3 months or 3 to 6 months. Completion rates (≥1 per week) across the study between digital biomarkers were similar (RHR: 56,517/77,664, 72.77%; temperature: 56,742/77,664, 73.06%; oxygen saturation: 57,088/77,664, 73.51%). Older age groups and lower managerial and intermediate occupations were associated with higher engagement, whereas working, being a current smoker, being overweight or obese, and high perceived stress were associated with lower engagement. Continued engagement was facilitated through routine and personal motivation, and poor engagement was caused by user error and app or equipment malfunctions preventing data input. From these results, we developed key recommendations to improve engagement in population-based mHealth studies. CONCLUSIONS: This mixed methods study demonstrated both high initial and sustained engagement in a large mHealth COVID-19 study over a ≥6-month period. Being nested in a known cohort study enabled the identification of participant characteristics and factors associated with engagement to inform future applications in population-based health research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9842396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98423962023-01-17 Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation Rennie, Kirsten L Lawlor, Emma R Yassaee, Arrash Booth, Adam Westgate, Kate Sharp, Stephen J Tyrrell, Carina S B Aral, Mert Wareham, Nicholas J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the interest in implementing mobile health (mHealth) in population-based health studies, but evidence is lacking on engagement and adherence in studies. We conducted a fully remote study for ≥6 months tracking COVID-19 digital biomarkers and symptoms using a smartphone app nested within an existing cohort of adults. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate participant characteristics associated with initial and sustained engagement in digital biomarker collection from a bespoke smartphone app and if engagement changed over time or because of COVID-19 factors and explore participants’ reasons for consenting to the smartphone substudy and experiences related to initial and continued engagement. METHODS: Participants in the Fenland COVID-19 study were invited to the app substudy from August 2020 to October 2020 until study closure (April 30, 2021). Participants were asked to complete digital biomarker modules (oxygen saturation, body temperature, and resting heart rate [RHR]) and possible COVID-19 symptoms in the app 3 times per week. Participants manually entered the measurements, except RHR that was measured using the smartphone camera. Engagement was categorized by median weekly frequency of completing the 3 digital biomarker modules (categories: 0, 1-2, and ≥3 times per week). Sociodemographic and health characteristics of those who did or did not consent to the substudy and by engagement category were explored. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 35 participants who were purposively sampled by sex, age, educational attainment, and engagement category, and data were analyzed thematically; 63% (22/35) of the participants consented to the app substudy, and 37% (13/35) of the participants did not consent. RESULTS: A total of 62.61% (2524/4031) of Fenland COVID-19 study participants consented to the app substudy. Of those, 90.21% (2277/2524) completed the app onboarding process. Median time in the app substudy was 34.5 weeks (IQR 34-37) with no change in engagement from 0 to 3 months or 3 to 6 months. Completion rates (≥1 per week) across the study between digital biomarkers were similar (RHR: 56,517/77,664, 72.77%; temperature: 56,742/77,664, 73.06%; oxygen saturation: 57,088/77,664, 73.51%). Older age groups and lower managerial and intermediate occupations were associated with higher engagement, whereas working, being a current smoker, being overweight or obese, and high perceived stress were associated with lower engagement. Continued engagement was facilitated through routine and personal motivation, and poor engagement was caused by user error and app or equipment malfunctions preventing data input. From these results, we developed key recommendations to improve engagement in population-based mHealth studies. CONCLUSIONS: This mixed methods study demonstrated both high initial and sustained engagement in a large mHealth COVID-19 study over a ≥6-month period. Being nested in a known cohort study enabled the identification of participant characteristics and factors associated with engagement to inform future applications in population-based health research. JMIR Publications 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9842396/ /pubmed/36194866 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40602 Text en ©Kirsten L Rennie, Emma R Lawlor, Arrash Yassaee, Adam Booth, Kate Westgate, Stephen J Sharp, Carina S B Tyrrell, Mert Aral, Nicholas J Wareham. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 13.01.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rennie, Kirsten L
Lawlor, Emma R
Yassaee, Arrash
Booth, Adam
Westgate, Kate
Sharp, Stephen J
Tyrrell, Carina S B
Aral, Mert
Wareham, Nicholas J
Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_fullStr Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_short Engagement With mHealth COVID-19 Digital Biomarker Measurements in a Longitudinal Cohort Study: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_sort engagement with mhealth covid-19 digital biomarker measurements in a longitudinal cohort study: mixed methods evaluation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9842396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194866
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40602
work_keys_str_mv AT renniekirstenl engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT lawloremmar engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT yassaeearrash engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT boothadam engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT westgatekate engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT sharpstephenj engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT tyrrellcarinasb engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT aralmert engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation
AT warehamnicholasj engagementwithmhealthcovid19digitalbiomarkermeasurementsinalongitudinalcohortstudymixedmethodsevaluation