Cargando…

Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the type, frequency and impact of MRI-related complications in patients with cochlear implants (CI) and MRI indications in different body regions. METHODS: For that purpose, the institutional radiology database of a single tertiary hospital was searched for patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberalar, Nilüfer Deniz, Reis, Jonas, Piechotta, Paula Louise, Beetz, Nick Lasse, Fehrenbach, Uli, Geisel, Dominik, Thomas, Andreas, Busse, Harald, Denecke, Timm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9842833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36645551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01353-x
_version_ 1784870233953009664
author Alberalar, Nilüfer Deniz
Reis, Jonas
Piechotta, Paula Louise
Beetz, Nick Lasse
Fehrenbach, Uli
Geisel, Dominik
Thomas, Andreas
Busse, Harald
Denecke, Timm
author_facet Alberalar, Nilüfer Deniz
Reis, Jonas
Piechotta, Paula Louise
Beetz, Nick Lasse
Fehrenbach, Uli
Geisel, Dominik
Thomas, Andreas
Busse, Harald
Denecke, Timm
author_sort Alberalar, Nilüfer Deniz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the type, frequency and impact of MRI-related complications in patients with cochlear implants (CI) and MRI indications in different body regions. METHODS: For that purpose, the institutional radiology database of a single tertiary hospital was searched for patients with a CI who underwent MRI between 2001 and 2018. The number of MRI examinations and complications were retrieved from the patient record. Examinations were categorized into five distinct body regions or combinations thereof. Records of CI artifacts in the head also included basic information on diagnostic image quality. RESULTS: Out of 1017 MRI database entries (examinations) of patients with a CI, 91 records were after implantation (71 patients) and 66 were attempted (no contraindications, 49 patients). In four cases (4/66, 6.1%), the magnet was dislocated and had to be replaced surgically. Three out of four severe complications occurred for examination regions outside the head. Thirteen MRI examinations were aborted due to pain (19.7%) and one because of artifacts—resulting in 48 scans (72.7%) completed successfully (36 patients). All cranial scans featured device artifacts in all sequences, but the majority of them did not affect proper imaging diagnostics in the respective region. CONCLUSION: This retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with MRI-conditional cochlear implants shows that MRI-related complications were common, at least in models with a fixed magnet, despite appropriate precautions and compliance with the manufacturers’ guidelines. MRI examinations of CI patients should therefore be indicated strictly until the exact causes have been clarified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9842833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98428332023-01-18 Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact Alberalar, Nilüfer Deniz Reis, Jonas Piechotta, Paula Louise Beetz, Nick Lasse Fehrenbach, Uli Geisel, Dominik Thomas, Andreas Busse, Harald Denecke, Timm Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess the type, frequency and impact of MRI-related complications in patients with cochlear implants (CI) and MRI indications in different body regions. METHODS: For that purpose, the institutional radiology database of a single tertiary hospital was searched for patients with a CI who underwent MRI between 2001 and 2018. The number of MRI examinations and complications were retrieved from the patient record. Examinations were categorized into five distinct body regions or combinations thereof. Records of CI artifacts in the head also included basic information on diagnostic image quality. RESULTS: Out of 1017 MRI database entries (examinations) of patients with a CI, 91 records were after implantation (71 patients) and 66 were attempted (no contraindications, 49 patients). In four cases (4/66, 6.1%), the magnet was dislocated and had to be replaced surgically. Three out of four severe complications occurred for examination regions outside the head. Thirteen MRI examinations were aborted due to pain (19.7%) and one because of artifacts—resulting in 48 scans (72.7%) completed successfully (36 patients). All cranial scans featured device artifacts in all sequences, but the majority of them did not affect proper imaging diagnostics in the respective region. CONCLUSION: This retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with MRI-conditional cochlear implants shows that MRI-related complications were common, at least in models with a fixed magnet, despite appropriate precautions and compliance with the manufacturers’ guidelines. MRI examinations of CI patients should therefore be indicated strictly until the exact causes have been clarified. Springer Vienna 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9842833/ /pubmed/36645551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01353-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Alberalar, Nilüfer Deniz
Reis, Jonas
Piechotta, Paula Louise
Beetz, Nick Lasse
Fehrenbach, Uli
Geisel, Dominik
Thomas, Andreas
Busse, Harald
Denecke, Timm
Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact
title Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact
title_full Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact
title_fullStr Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact
title_full_unstemmed Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact
title_short Complications of cochlear implants with MRI scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact
title_sort complications of cochlear implants with mri scans in different body regions: type, frequency and impact
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9842833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36645551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01353-x
work_keys_str_mv AT alberalarniluferdeniz complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT reisjonas complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT piechottapaulalouise complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT beetznicklasse complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT fehrenbachuli complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT geiseldominik complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT thomasandreas complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT busseharald complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact
AT denecketimm complicationsofcochlearimplantswithmriscansindifferentbodyregionstypefrequencyandimpact