Cargando…
Electric impedance tomography-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power in ARDS: a randomized crossover pilot trial
BACKGROUND: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can lead to recruitment or overdistension. Current strategies utilized for PEEP titration do not permit the distinction. Electric impedance tomography (EIT) det...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04315-x |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can lead to recruitment or overdistension. Current strategies utilized for PEEP titration do not permit the distinction. Electric impedance tomography (EIT) detects and quantifies the presence of both collapse and overdistension. We investigated whether using EIT-guided PEEP titration leads to decreased mechanical power compared to high-PEEP/FiO2 tables. METHODS: A single-center, randomized crossover pilot trial comparing EIT-guided PEEP selection versus PEEP selection using the High-PEEP/FiO(2) table in patients with moderate–severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary outcome was the change in mechanical power after each PEEP selection strategy. Secondary outcomes included changes in the 4 × driving pressure + respiratory rate (4 ΔP, + RR index) index, driving pressure, plateau pressure, PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, and static compliance. RESULTS: EIT was consistently associated with a decrease in mechanical power compared to PEEP/FiO(2) tables (mean difference − 4.36 J/min, 95% CI − 6.7, − 1.95, p = 0.002) and led to lower values in the 4ΔP + RR index (− 11.42 J/min, 95% CI − 19.01, − 3.82, p = 0.007) mainly driven by a decrease in the elastic–dynamic power (− 1.61 J/min, − 2.99, − 0.22, p = 0.027). The elastic–static and resistive powers were unchanged. Similarly, EIT led to a statistically significant change in set PEEP (− 2 cmH(2)O, p = 0.046), driving pressure, (− 2.92 cmH2O, p = 0.003), peak pressure (− 6.25 cmH(2)O, p = 0.003), plateau pressure (− 4.53 cmH(2)O, p = 0.006), and static respiratory system compliance (+ 7.93 ml/cmH(2)O, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate–severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, EIT-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power mainly through a reduction in elastic–dynamic power. Trial registration This trial was prospectively registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 03793842) on January 4th, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04315-x. |
---|