Cargando…

A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance

BACKGROUND: The placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) has traditionally relied on measurements and anatomical landmarks. It involves post-placement chest X-rays (CXRs) and occasional repositioning, which incur additional direct and indirect costs, such as delays in care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Yanfen, Wang, Guodong, Song, Li, Yan, Xiaohong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660617
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5417
_version_ 1784870376129429504
author Shen, Yanfen
Wang, Guodong
Song, Li
Yan, Xiaohong
author_facet Shen, Yanfen
Wang, Guodong
Song, Li
Yan, Xiaohong
author_sort Shen, Yanfen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) has traditionally relied on measurements and anatomical landmarks. It involves post-placement chest X-rays (CXRs) and occasional repositioning, which incur additional direct and indirect costs, such as delays in care and staff time. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a routine post-procedural CXR in the era of ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG)-guided PICC insertion. METHODS: A retrospective two-center study was conducted to review the clinical records of all patients who had PICCs in the Venous Access Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and The Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2020. PICC placement was only available to patients who were 18 years or older, had in-sinus rhythm. The incidence of catheter misplacement after insertion was measured. Cavoatrial junction or the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) were defined as ideal catheter tip locations. A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine potential risk factors associated with PICC-related complications and a cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of the use of CXR. RESULTS: There were 2,863 samples from 2,653 patients included. The overall incidence of intraprocedural and primary catheter misplacement was 7.3% (n=210) and 0.70% (n=20), respectively. There was a high risk of primary catheter misplacement when the left-arm was chosen for placement [odds ratio (OR): 11.163; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.720–33.495; P<0.001]. The overall cost of performing CXR for screening of PICC-related complications was $23,858 per year, and that of using CXR to diagnose 1 case of catheter misplacement was $1,789. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that misplacement of PICCs guided by ultrasound and IC-ECG is rare and that postprocedural CXR is very costly. In our setting, routine postprocedural CXR is unnecessary especially when the PICC is catheterized in the right arm, and is not a wise option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9843348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98433482023-01-18 A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance Shen, Yanfen Wang, Guodong Song, Li Yan, Xiaohong Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) has traditionally relied on measurements and anatomical landmarks. It involves post-placement chest X-rays (CXRs) and occasional repositioning, which incur additional direct and indirect costs, such as delays in care and staff time. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a routine post-procedural CXR in the era of ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG)-guided PICC insertion. METHODS: A retrospective two-center study was conducted to review the clinical records of all patients who had PICCs in the Venous Access Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute and The Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2020. PICC placement was only available to patients who were 18 years or older, had in-sinus rhythm. The incidence of catheter misplacement after insertion was measured. Cavoatrial junction or the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) were defined as ideal catheter tip locations. A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine potential risk factors associated with PICC-related complications and a cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of the use of CXR. RESULTS: There were 2,863 samples from 2,653 patients included. The overall incidence of intraprocedural and primary catheter misplacement was 7.3% (n=210) and 0.70% (n=20), respectively. There was a high risk of primary catheter misplacement when the left-arm was chosen for placement [odds ratio (OR): 11.163; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.720–33.495; P<0.001]. The overall cost of performing CXR for screening of PICC-related complications was $23,858 per year, and that of using CXR to diagnose 1 case of catheter misplacement was $1,789. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that misplacement of PICCs guided by ultrasound and IC-ECG is rare and that postprocedural CXR is very costly. In our setting, routine postprocedural CXR is unnecessary especially when the PICC is catheterized in the right arm, and is not a wise option. AME Publishing Company 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9843348/ /pubmed/36660617 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5417 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Shen, Yanfen
Wang, Guodong
Song, Li
Yan, Xiaohong
A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance
title A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance
title_full A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance
title_fullStr A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance
title_short A retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest X-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance
title_sort retrospective two-center cohort study on the use of routine chest x-ray after peripherally inserted central catheter placement under ultrasound and intracavitary electrocardiography guidance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660617
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5417
work_keys_str_mv AT shenyanfen aretrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance
AT wangguodong aretrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance
AT songli aretrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance
AT yanxiaohong aretrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance
AT shenyanfen retrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance
AT wangguodong retrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance
AT songli retrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance
AT yanxiaohong retrospectivetwocentercohortstudyontheuseofroutinechestxrayafterperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterplacementunderultrasoundandintracavitaryelectrocardiographyguidance