Cargando…
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: There are numerous laser treatments for acne scars in clinical practice. However, there are no clinical studies comparing all laser methods to provide an evidence-based bias for clinicians to choose the best strategy. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis was conduc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660635 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5997 |
_version_ | 1784870392295325696 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Zixiao Wang, Tao Li, Wei Liang, Qi Chen, Weihua |
author_facet | Zhao, Zixiao Wang, Tao Li, Wei Liang, Qi Chen, Weihua |
author_sort | Zhao, Zixiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are numerous laser treatments for acne scars in clinical practice. However, there are no clinical studies comparing all laser methods to provide an evidence-based bias for clinicians to choose the best strategy. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of different types of laser treatment on acne scars. This study can provide the most effective treatment for acne scars in clinical practice. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from their inception to July 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the bias of the included original studies. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to investigate the efficacy of laser treatment strategies in scar improvement, cure rate, and satisfaction. RESULTS: As shown by the results, the top 3 treatment options for scar improvement were fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) + platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): 0.699], 1064Nd (1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet picosecond laser) + 15%VC (Vitamin C; SUCRA: 0.675), and 1064Nd (SUCRA: 0.627). The standard mean difference (SMD) of FCL + PRP was −1.76 (95% CI: −3.49, −0.03), compared with that of FCL. The top 3 treatment options for improving cure rate were Er (Er:YAG laser treatment) + PRP (SUCRA: 0.873), FCL (SUCRA: 0.773), and FCL + 30% salicylic acid (30%SC) (SUCRA: 0.772). The RR of Er + PRP cure rate was 13.86 (95% CI: 1.79, 107.22), compared with non-laser radiofrequency therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that combined therapies should be used to treat acne scars. Er + PRP showed the highest cure rate of acne scar, followed by FCL + 30%SC or FCL monotherapy. FCL combined with PRP could improve acne scarring to the greatest extent, and 1064Nd combined with 15%VC can also exert a good effect. As for satisfaction, FCL monotherapy was the most satisfactory methods for patients, followed by PRP monotherapy. Therefore, Er + PRP and FCL + PRP can be used as the first choice for clinical treatment of acne scars. Additionally, using FCL alone is also an effective and elective treatment method due to its affordable cost and comfort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9843402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98434022023-01-18 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis Zhao, Zixiao Wang, Tao Li, Wei Liang, Qi Chen, Weihua Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: There are numerous laser treatments for acne scars in clinical practice. However, there are no clinical studies comparing all laser methods to provide an evidence-based bias for clinicians to choose the best strategy. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of different types of laser treatment on acne scars. This study can provide the most effective treatment for acne scars in clinical practice. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from their inception to July 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the bias of the included original studies. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to investigate the efficacy of laser treatment strategies in scar improvement, cure rate, and satisfaction. RESULTS: As shown by the results, the top 3 treatment options for scar improvement were fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) + platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): 0.699], 1064Nd (1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet picosecond laser) + 15%VC (Vitamin C; SUCRA: 0.675), and 1064Nd (SUCRA: 0.627). The standard mean difference (SMD) of FCL + PRP was −1.76 (95% CI: −3.49, −0.03), compared with that of FCL. The top 3 treatment options for improving cure rate were Er (Er:YAG laser treatment) + PRP (SUCRA: 0.873), FCL (SUCRA: 0.773), and FCL + 30% salicylic acid (30%SC) (SUCRA: 0.772). The RR of Er + PRP cure rate was 13.86 (95% CI: 1.79, 107.22), compared with non-laser radiofrequency therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that combined therapies should be used to treat acne scars. Er + PRP showed the highest cure rate of acne scar, followed by FCL + 30%SC or FCL monotherapy. FCL combined with PRP could improve acne scarring to the greatest extent, and 1064Nd combined with 15%VC can also exert a good effect. As for satisfaction, FCL monotherapy was the most satisfactory methods for patients, followed by PRP monotherapy. Therefore, Er + PRP and FCL + PRP can be used as the first choice for clinical treatment of acne scars. Additionally, using FCL alone is also an effective and elective treatment method due to its affordable cost and comfort. AME Publishing Company 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9843402/ /pubmed/36660635 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5997 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhao, Zixiao Wang, Tao Li, Wei Liang, Qi Chen, Weihua To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_full | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_short | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis |
title_sort | to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660635 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaozixiao toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT wangtao toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT liwei toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT liangqi toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT chenweihua toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis |