Cargando…

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There are numerous laser treatments for acne scars in clinical practice. However, there are no clinical studies comparing all laser methods to provide an evidence-based bias for clinicians to choose the best strategy. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis was conduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zixiao, Wang, Tao, Li, Wei, Liang, Qi, Chen, Weihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660635
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5997
_version_ 1784870392295325696
author Zhao, Zixiao
Wang, Tao
Li, Wei
Liang, Qi
Chen, Weihua
author_facet Zhao, Zixiao
Wang, Tao
Li, Wei
Liang, Qi
Chen, Weihua
author_sort Zhao, Zixiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are numerous laser treatments for acne scars in clinical practice. However, there are no clinical studies comparing all laser methods to provide an evidence-based bias for clinicians to choose the best strategy. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of different types of laser treatment on acne scars. This study can provide the most effective treatment for acne scars in clinical practice. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from their inception to July 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the bias of the included original studies. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to investigate the efficacy of laser treatment strategies in scar improvement, cure rate, and satisfaction. RESULTS: As shown by the results, the top 3 treatment options for scar improvement were fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) + platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): 0.699], 1064Nd (1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet picosecond laser) + 15%VC (Vitamin C; SUCRA: 0.675), and 1064Nd (SUCRA: 0.627). The standard mean difference (SMD) of FCL + PRP was −1.76 (95% CI: −3.49, −0.03), compared with that of FCL. The top 3 treatment options for improving cure rate were Er (Er:YAG laser treatment) + PRP (SUCRA: 0.873), FCL (SUCRA: 0.773), and FCL + 30% salicylic acid (30%SC) (SUCRA: 0.772). The RR of Er + PRP cure rate was 13.86 (95% CI: 1.79, 107.22), compared with non-laser radiofrequency therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that combined therapies should be used to treat acne scars. Er + PRP showed the highest cure rate of acne scar, followed by FCL + 30%SC or FCL monotherapy. FCL combined with PRP could improve acne scarring to the greatest extent, and 1064Nd combined with 15%VC can also exert a good effect. As for satisfaction, FCL monotherapy was the most satisfactory methods for patients, followed by PRP monotherapy. Therefore, Er + PRP and FCL + PRP can be used as the first choice for clinical treatment of acne scars. Additionally, using FCL alone is also an effective and elective treatment method due to its affordable cost and comfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9843402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98434022023-01-18 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis Zhao, Zixiao Wang, Tao Li, Wei Liang, Qi Chen, Weihua Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: There are numerous laser treatments for acne scars in clinical practice. However, there are no clinical studies comparing all laser methods to provide an evidence-based bias for clinicians to choose the best strategy. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of different types of laser treatment on acne scars. This study can provide the most effective treatment for acne scars in clinical practice. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from their inception to July 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the bias of the included original studies. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to investigate the efficacy of laser treatment strategies in scar improvement, cure rate, and satisfaction. RESULTS: As shown by the results, the top 3 treatment options for scar improvement were fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) + platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): 0.699], 1064Nd (1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet picosecond laser) + 15%VC (Vitamin C; SUCRA: 0.675), and 1064Nd (SUCRA: 0.627). The standard mean difference (SMD) of FCL + PRP was −1.76 (95% CI: −3.49, −0.03), compared with that of FCL. The top 3 treatment options for improving cure rate were Er (Er:YAG laser treatment) + PRP (SUCRA: 0.873), FCL (SUCRA: 0.773), and FCL + 30% salicylic acid (30%SC) (SUCRA: 0.772). The RR of Er + PRP cure rate was 13.86 (95% CI: 1.79, 107.22), compared with non-laser radiofrequency therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that combined therapies should be used to treat acne scars. Er + PRP showed the highest cure rate of acne scar, followed by FCL + 30%SC or FCL monotherapy. FCL combined with PRP could improve acne scarring to the greatest extent, and 1064Nd combined with 15%VC can also exert a good effect. As for satisfaction, FCL monotherapy was the most satisfactory methods for patients, followed by PRP monotherapy. Therefore, Er + PRP and FCL + PRP can be used as the first choice for clinical treatment of acne scars. Additionally, using FCL alone is also an effective and elective treatment method due to its affordable cost and comfort. AME Publishing Company 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9843402/ /pubmed/36660635 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5997 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhao, Zixiao
Wang, Tao
Li, Wei
Liang, Qi
Chen, Weihua
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660635
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5997
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaozixiao toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangtao toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT liwei toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT liangqi toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenweihua toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyoflaserinterventionsforfacialacnescarsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis