Cargando…

Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique

BACKGROUND: Deep-learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) systems using MRI for prostate cancer (PCa) detection have demonstrated good performance. Nevertheless, DL-CAD systems are vulnerable to high heterogeneities in DWI, which can interfere with DL-CAD assessments and impair performance....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Lei, Fu, Caixia, Song, Xinyang, Grimm, Robert, von Busch, Heinrich, Benkert, Thomas, Kamen, Ali, Lou, Bin, Huisman, Henkjan, Tong, Angela, Penzkofer, Tobias, Choi, Moon Hyung, Shabunin, Ivan, Winkel, David, Xing, Pengyi, Szolar, Dieter, Coakley, Fergus, Shea, Steven, Szurowska, Edyta, Guo, Jing-yi, Li, Liang, Li, Yue-hua, Zhao, Jun-gong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00527-0
_version_ 1784870489537118208
author Hu, Lei
Fu, Caixia
Song, Xinyang
Grimm, Robert
von Busch, Heinrich
Benkert, Thomas
Kamen, Ali
Lou, Bin
Huisman, Henkjan
Tong, Angela
Penzkofer, Tobias
Choi, Moon Hyung
Shabunin, Ivan
Winkel, David
Xing, Pengyi
Szolar, Dieter
Coakley, Fergus
Shea, Steven
Szurowska, Edyta
Guo, Jing-yi
Li, Liang
Li, Yue-hua
Zhao, Jun-gong
author_facet Hu, Lei
Fu, Caixia
Song, Xinyang
Grimm, Robert
von Busch, Heinrich
Benkert, Thomas
Kamen, Ali
Lou, Bin
Huisman, Henkjan
Tong, Angela
Penzkofer, Tobias
Choi, Moon Hyung
Shabunin, Ivan
Winkel, David
Xing, Pengyi
Szolar, Dieter
Coakley, Fergus
Shea, Steven
Szurowska, Edyta
Guo, Jing-yi
Li, Liang
Li, Yue-hua
Zhao, Jun-gong
author_sort Hu, Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep-learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) systems using MRI for prostate cancer (PCa) detection have demonstrated good performance. Nevertheless, DL-CAD systems are vulnerable to high heterogeneities in DWI, which can interfere with DL-CAD assessments and impair performance. This study aims to compare PCa detection of DL-CAD between zoomed-field-of-view echo-planar DWI (z-DWI) and full-field-of-view DWI (f-DWI) and find the risk factors affecting DL-CAD diagnostic efficiency. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 354 consecutive participants who underwent MRI including T2WI, f-DWI, and z-DWI because of clinically suspected PCa. A DL-CAD was used to compare the performance of f-DWI and z-DWI both on a patient level and lesion level. We used the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics analysis and alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics analysis to compare the performances of DL-CAD using f- DWI and z-DWI. The risk factors affecting the DL-CAD were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: DL-CAD with z-DWI had a significantly better overall accuracy than that with f-DWI both on patient level and lesion level (AUC(patient): 0.89 vs. 0.86; AUC(lesion): 0.86 vs. 0.76; P < .001). The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of lesions in DWI was an independent risk factor of false positives (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12; P < .001). Rectal susceptibility artifacts, lesion diameter, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were independent risk factors of both false positives (OR(rectal susceptibility artifact) = 5.46; OR(diameter,) = 1.12; OR(ADC) = 0.998; all P < .001) and false negatives (OR(rectal susceptibility artifact) = 3.31; OR(diameter) = 0.82; OR(ADC) = 1.007; all P ≤ .03) of DL-CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Z-DWI has potential to improve the detection performance of a prostate MRI based DL-CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, NO. ChiCTR2100041834. Registered 7 January 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9843860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98438602023-01-18 Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique Hu, Lei Fu, Caixia Song, Xinyang Grimm, Robert von Busch, Heinrich Benkert, Thomas Kamen, Ali Lou, Bin Huisman, Henkjan Tong, Angela Penzkofer, Tobias Choi, Moon Hyung Shabunin, Ivan Winkel, David Xing, Pengyi Szolar, Dieter Coakley, Fergus Shea, Steven Szurowska, Edyta Guo, Jing-yi Li, Liang Li, Yue-hua Zhao, Jun-gong Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Deep-learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) systems using MRI for prostate cancer (PCa) detection have demonstrated good performance. Nevertheless, DL-CAD systems are vulnerable to high heterogeneities in DWI, which can interfere with DL-CAD assessments and impair performance. This study aims to compare PCa detection of DL-CAD between zoomed-field-of-view echo-planar DWI (z-DWI) and full-field-of-view DWI (f-DWI) and find the risk factors affecting DL-CAD diagnostic efficiency. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 354 consecutive participants who underwent MRI including T2WI, f-DWI, and z-DWI because of clinically suspected PCa. A DL-CAD was used to compare the performance of f-DWI and z-DWI both on a patient level and lesion level. We used the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics analysis and alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics analysis to compare the performances of DL-CAD using f- DWI and z-DWI. The risk factors affecting the DL-CAD were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: DL-CAD with z-DWI had a significantly better overall accuracy than that with f-DWI both on patient level and lesion level (AUC(patient): 0.89 vs. 0.86; AUC(lesion): 0.86 vs. 0.76; P < .001). The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of lesions in DWI was an independent risk factor of false positives (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12; P < .001). Rectal susceptibility artifacts, lesion diameter, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were independent risk factors of both false positives (OR(rectal susceptibility artifact) = 5.46; OR(diameter,) = 1.12; OR(ADC) = 0.998; all P < .001) and false negatives (OR(rectal susceptibility artifact) = 3.31; OR(diameter) = 0.82; OR(ADC) = 1.007; all P ≤ .03) of DL-CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Z-DWI has potential to improve the detection performance of a prostate MRI based DL-CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, NO. ChiCTR2100041834. Registered 7 January 2021. BioMed Central 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9843860/ /pubmed/36647150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00527-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Lei
Fu, Caixia
Song, Xinyang
Grimm, Robert
von Busch, Heinrich
Benkert, Thomas
Kamen, Ali
Lou, Bin
Huisman, Henkjan
Tong, Angela
Penzkofer, Tobias
Choi, Moon Hyung
Shabunin, Ivan
Winkel, David
Xing, Pengyi
Szolar, Dieter
Coakley, Fergus
Shea, Steven
Szurowska, Edyta
Guo, Jing-yi
Li, Liang
Li, Yue-hua
Zhao, Jun-gong
Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique
title Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique
title_full Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique
title_fullStr Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique
title_full_unstemmed Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique
title_short Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique
title_sort automated deep-learning system in the assessment of mri-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00527-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hulei automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT fucaixia automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT songxinyang automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT grimmrobert automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT vonbuschheinrich automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT benkertthomas automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT kamenali automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT loubin automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT huismanhenkjan automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT tongangela automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT penzkofertobias automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT choimoonhyung automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT shabuninivan automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT winkeldavid automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT xingpengyi automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT szolardieter automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT coakleyfergus automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT sheasteven automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT szurowskaedyta automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT guojingyi automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT liliang automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT liyuehua automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique
AT zhaojungong automateddeeplearningsystemintheassessmentofmrivisibleprostatecancercomparisonofadvancedzoomeddiffusionweightedimagingandconventionaltechnique