Cargando…
Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 spread rapidly in UK care homes for older people in the early pandemic. National infection control recommendations included remote resident assessment. A region in North-West England introduced a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker for homes to identify early signs of resident dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00387-y |
_version_ | 1784870520747982848 |
---|---|
author | Nelson, Pauline A. Bradley, Fay Ullah, Akbar Whittaker, Will Brunton, Lisa Calovski, Vid Money, Annemarie Dowding, Dawn Cullum, Nicky Wilson, Paul |
author_facet | Nelson, Pauline A. Bradley, Fay Ullah, Akbar Whittaker, Will Brunton, Lisa Calovski, Vid Money, Annemarie Dowding, Dawn Cullum, Nicky Wilson, Paul |
author_sort | Nelson, Pauline A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COVID-19 spread rapidly in UK care homes for older people in the early pandemic. National infection control recommendations included remote resident assessment. A region in North-West England introduced a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker for homes to identify early signs of resident deterioration to facilitate care responses. We examined the implementation, uptake and use of the tracker in care homes across four geographical case study localities in the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: This was a rapid, mixed-methods, multi-locality case study. Tracker uptake was calculated using the number of care homes taking up the tracker as a proportion of the total number of care homes in a locality. Mean tracker use was summarised at locality level and compared. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals involved in tracker implementation and used to explore implementation factors across localities. Template Analysis with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the interpretation of qualitative data. RESULTS: Uptake varied across the four case study localities ranging between 13.8 and 77.8%. Tracker use decreased in all localities over time at different rates, with average use ranging between 18 and 58%. The implementation context differed between localities and the process of implementation deviated over time from the initially planned strategy, for stakeholder engagement and care homes’ training. Four interpretative themes reflected the most influential factors appearing to affect tracker uptake and use: (1) the process of implementation, (2) implementation readiness, (3) clarity of purpose/perceived value and (4) relative priority in the context of wider system pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings resonate with the digital solutions evidence base prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting three key factors that can inform future development and implementation of rapid digital responses in care home settings even in times of crisis: an incremental approach to implementation with testing of organisational readiness and attention to implementation climate, particularly the innovation’s fit with local contexts (i.e. systems, infrastructure, work processes and practices); involvement of end-users in innovation design and development; and enabling users’ easy access to sustained, high-quality, appropriate training and support to enable staff to adapt to digital solutions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00387-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9843982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98439822023-01-18 Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study Nelson, Pauline A. Bradley, Fay Ullah, Akbar Whittaker, Will Brunton, Lisa Calovski, Vid Money, Annemarie Dowding, Dawn Cullum, Nicky Wilson, Paul Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: COVID-19 spread rapidly in UK care homes for older people in the early pandemic. National infection control recommendations included remote resident assessment. A region in North-West England introduced a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker for homes to identify early signs of resident deterioration to facilitate care responses. We examined the implementation, uptake and use of the tracker in care homes across four geographical case study localities in the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: This was a rapid, mixed-methods, multi-locality case study. Tracker uptake was calculated using the number of care homes taking up the tracker as a proportion of the total number of care homes in a locality. Mean tracker use was summarised at locality level and compared. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals involved in tracker implementation and used to explore implementation factors across localities. Template Analysis with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the interpretation of qualitative data. RESULTS: Uptake varied across the four case study localities ranging between 13.8 and 77.8%. Tracker use decreased in all localities over time at different rates, with average use ranging between 18 and 58%. The implementation context differed between localities and the process of implementation deviated over time from the initially planned strategy, for stakeholder engagement and care homes’ training. Four interpretative themes reflected the most influential factors appearing to affect tracker uptake and use: (1) the process of implementation, (2) implementation readiness, (3) clarity of purpose/perceived value and (4) relative priority in the context of wider system pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings resonate with the digital solutions evidence base prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting three key factors that can inform future development and implementation of rapid digital responses in care home settings even in times of crisis: an incremental approach to implementation with testing of organisational readiness and attention to implementation climate, particularly the innovation’s fit with local contexts (i.e. systems, infrastructure, work processes and practices); involvement of end-users in innovation design and development; and enabling users’ easy access to sustained, high-quality, appropriate training and support to enable staff to adapt to digital solutions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00387-y. BioMed Central 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9843982/ /pubmed/36650559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00387-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Nelson, Pauline A. Bradley, Fay Ullah, Akbar Whittaker, Will Brunton, Lisa Calovski, Vid Money, Annemarie Dowding, Dawn Cullum, Nicky Wilson, Paul Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study |
title | Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study |
title_full | Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study |
title_fullStr | Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study |
title_short | Implementation, uptake and use of a digital COVID-19 symptom tracker in English care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study |
title_sort | implementation, uptake and use of a digital covid-19 symptom tracker in english care homes in the coronavirus pandemic: a mixed-methods, multi-locality case study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00387-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsonpaulinea implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT bradleyfay implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT ullahakbar implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT whittakerwill implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT bruntonlisa implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT calovskivid implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT moneyannemarie implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT dowdingdawn implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT cullumnicky implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy AT wilsonpaul implementationuptakeanduseofadigitalcovid19symptomtrackerinenglishcarehomesinthecoronaviruspandemicamixedmethodsmultilocalitycasestudy |