Cargando…

Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools

(1) Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) poses a high risk of worsening outcomes for patients and is also a burden for hospitals. The leading guidelines recommend standardized POD assessment and prevention. The aim of this subgroup analysis of the PRe-Operative Prediction of Postoperative DEliri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirfel, Andrea, Jossen, Diane, Menzenbach, Jan, Mayr, Andreas, Wittmann, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8010011
_version_ 1784870617965658112
author Kirfel, Andrea
Jossen, Diane
Menzenbach, Jan
Mayr, Andreas
Wittmann, Maria
author_facet Kirfel, Andrea
Jossen, Diane
Menzenbach, Jan
Mayr, Andreas
Wittmann, Maria
author_sort Kirfel, Andrea
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) poses a high risk of worsening outcomes for patients and is also a burden for hospitals. The leading guidelines recommend standardized POD assessment and prevention. The aim of this subgroup analysis of the PRe-Operative Prediction of Postoperative DElirium by Appropriate SCreening (PROPDESC) trial was to compare different delirium assessments and to analyse the frequency of POD on five postoperative days. (2) Methods: This prospective observational trial enrolled 1097 patients in a university hospital from 2018 until 2019. The following POD assessment tools were used for five consecutive days: Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) or Confusion Assessment Method for normal ward (CAM), 4 A’s Test (4AT) and Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale. (3) Results: In a 5-day visit interval, most new POD developments occurred on the first and second postoperative day. A clear recommendation for a specific POD assessment tool based on our results cannot be given. (4) Conclusions: According to guidelines, a POD assessment should take place on the first five postoperative days, but of these, the first two are those of highest POD occurrence. The POD assessment tool used should at best include direct patient questioning and aspects of patient observation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9844299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98442992023-01-18 Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools Kirfel, Andrea Jossen, Diane Menzenbach, Jan Mayr, Andreas Wittmann, Maria Geriatrics (Basel) Article (1) Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) poses a high risk of worsening outcomes for patients and is also a burden for hospitals. The leading guidelines recommend standardized POD assessment and prevention. The aim of this subgroup analysis of the PRe-Operative Prediction of Postoperative DElirium by Appropriate SCreening (PROPDESC) trial was to compare different delirium assessments and to analyse the frequency of POD on five postoperative days. (2) Methods: This prospective observational trial enrolled 1097 patients in a university hospital from 2018 until 2019. The following POD assessment tools were used for five consecutive days: Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) or Confusion Assessment Method for normal ward (CAM), 4 A’s Test (4AT) and Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale. (3) Results: In a 5-day visit interval, most new POD developments occurred on the first and second postoperative day. A clear recommendation for a specific POD assessment tool based on our results cannot be given. (4) Conclusions: According to guidelines, a POD assessment should take place on the first five postoperative days, but of these, the first two are those of highest POD occurrence. The POD assessment tool used should at best include direct patient questioning and aspects of patient observation. MDPI 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9844299/ /pubmed/36648916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8010011 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kirfel, Andrea
Jossen, Diane
Menzenbach, Jan
Mayr, Andreas
Wittmann, Maria
Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools
title Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools
title_full Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools
title_fullStr Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools
title_full_unstemmed Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools
title_short Occurrence of Postoperative Delirium and the Use of Different Assessment Tools
title_sort occurrence of postoperative delirium and the use of different assessment tools
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8010011
work_keys_str_mv AT kirfelandrea occurrenceofpostoperativedeliriumandtheuseofdifferentassessmenttools
AT jossendiane occurrenceofpostoperativedeliriumandtheuseofdifferentassessmenttools
AT menzenbachjan occurrenceofpostoperativedeliriumandtheuseofdifferentassessmenttools
AT mayrandreas occurrenceofpostoperativedeliriumandtheuseofdifferentassessmenttools
AT wittmannmaria occurrenceofpostoperativedeliriumandtheuseofdifferentassessmenttools