Cargando…

Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) following endoscopic transcanal infrapromontorial vestibular schwannoma (VS) dissection is a feasible intervention in intracanalicular VS, with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, but no audiologic results have ever been reported in the literatur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dallari, Virginia, Apa, Enrico, Monzani, Daniele, Genovese, Elisabetta, Marchioni, Daniele, Soloperto, Davide, Sacchetto, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010001
_version_ 1784870635461148672
author Dallari, Virginia
Apa, Enrico
Monzani, Daniele
Genovese, Elisabetta
Marchioni, Daniele
Soloperto, Davide
Sacchetto, Luca
author_facet Dallari, Virginia
Apa, Enrico
Monzani, Daniele
Genovese, Elisabetta
Marchioni, Daniele
Soloperto, Davide
Sacchetto, Luca
author_sort Dallari, Virginia
collection PubMed
description Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) following endoscopic transcanal infrapromontorial vestibular schwannoma (VS) dissection is a feasible intervention in intracanalicular VS, with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, but no audiologic results have ever been reported in the literature. Methods: From 2015 to 2021 in the Otorhynolaryngology Departments of Modena and Verona, three patients underwent this intervention. All were suffering from sporadic left-sided intracanalicular Koos I VS. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and electrophysiological measurements were performed before and after the placement of the electrode array, respectively. Since device activation one month after the surgery, each patient was followed up with audiometric tests, data logging, electrode impedance measurements and neural response telemetry performed at each scheduled fitting session at 15 days and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: Only in patient No. 3, an auditory benefit was observed and still evident even 36 months after activation. Impedances increased progressively in patient No. 1 and a benefit was never reported. Patient No. 2 left the follow-up for worsening comorbidities. Conclusions: CI following transcanal infrapromontorial VS resection is a beneficial intervention. The residual cochlear nerve after the tumour dissection and the course of electrophysiological measurements in the postoperative period were the main predictive factors for audiological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9844357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98443572023-01-18 Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series Dallari, Virginia Apa, Enrico Monzani, Daniele Genovese, Elisabetta Marchioni, Daniele Soloperto, Davide Sacchetto, Luca Audiol Res Article Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) following endoscopic transcanal infrapromontorial vestibular schwannoma (VS) dissection is a feasible intervention in intracanalicular VS, with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, but no audiologic results have ever been reported in the literature. Methods: From 2015 to 2021 in the Otorhynolaryngology Departments of Modena and Verona, three patients underwent this intervention. All were suffering from sporadic left-sided intracanalicular Koos I VS. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and electrophysiological measurements were performed before and after the placement of the electrode array, respectively. Since device activation one month after the surgery, each patient was followed up with audiometric tests, data logging, electrode impedance measurements and neural response telemetry performed at each scheduled fitting session at 15 days and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: Only in patient No. 3, an auditory benefit was observed and still evident even 36 months after activation. Impedances increased progressively in patient No. 1 and a benefit was never reported. Patient No. 2 left the follow-up for worsening comorbidities. Conclusions: CI following transcanal infrapromontorial VS resection is a beneficial intervention. The residual cochlear nerve after the tumour dissection and the course of electrophysiological measurements in the postoperative period were the main predictive factors for audiological outcomes. MDPI 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9844357/ /pubmed/36648922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010001 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dallari, Virginia
Apa, Enrico
Monzani, Daniele
Genovese, Elisabetta
Marchioni, Daniele
Soloperto, Davide
Sacchetto, Luca
Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series
title Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series
title_full Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series
title_fullStr Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series
title_short Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series
title_sort cochlear implantation following transcanal infrapromontorial approach for vestibular schwannoma: a case series
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010001
work_keys_str_mv AT dallarivirginia cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries
AT apaenrico cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries
AT monzanidaniele cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries
AT genoveseelisabetta cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries
AT marchionidaniele cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries
AT solopertodavide cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries
AT sacchettoluca cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries