Cargando…
Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series
Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) following endoscopic transcanal infrapromontorial vestibular schwannoma (VS) dissection is a feasible intervention in intracanalicular VS, with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, but no audiologic results have ever been reported in the literatur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010001 |
_version_ | 1784870635461148672 |
---|---|
author | Dallari, Virginia Apa, Enrico Monzani, Daniele Genovese, Elisabetta Marchioni, Daniele Soloperto, Davide Sacchetto, Luca |
author_facet | Dallari, Virginia Apa, Enrico Monzani, Daniele Genovese, Elisabetta Marchioni, Daniele Soloperto, Davide Sacchetto, Luca |
author_sort | Dallari, Virginia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) following endoscopic transcanal infrapromontorial vestibular schwannoma (VS) dissection is a feasible intervention in intracanalicular VS, with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, but no audiologic results have ever been reported in the literature. Methods: From 2015 to 2021 in the Otorhynolaryngology Departments of Modena and Verona, three patients underwent this intervention. All were suffering from sporadic left-sided intracanalicular Koos I VS. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and electrophysiological measurements were performed before and after the placement of the electrode array, respectively. Since device activation one month after the surgery, each patient was followed up with audiometric tests, data logging, electrode impedance measurements and neural response telemetry performed at each scheduled fitting session at 15 days and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: Only in patient No. 3, an auditory benefit was observed and still evident even 36 months after activation. Impedances increased progressively in patient No. 1 and a benefit was never reported. Patient No. 2 left the follow-up for worsening comorbidities. Conclusions: CI following transcanal infrapromontorial VS resection is a beneficial intervention. The residual cochlear nerve after the tumour dissection and the course of electrophysiological measurements in the postoperative period were the main predictive factors for audiological outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9844357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98443572023-01-18 Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series Dallari, Virginia Apa, Enrico Monzani, Daniele Genovese, Elisabetta Marchioni, Daniele Soloperto, Davide Sacchetto, Luca Audiol Res Article Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) following endoscopic transcanal infrapromontorial vestibular schwannoma (VS) dissection is a feasible intervention in intracanalicular VS, with minimal extension into the cerebellopontine angle, but no audiologic results have ever been reported in the literature. Methods: From 2015 to 2021 in the Otorhynolaryngology Departments of Modena and Verona, three patients underwent this intervention. All were suffering from sporadic left-sided intracanalicular Koos I VS. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and electrophysiological measurements were performed before and after the placement of the electrode array, respectively. Since device activation one month after the surgery, each patient was followed up with audiometric tests, data logging, electrode impedance measurements and neural response telemetry performed at each scheduled fitting session at 15 days and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: Only in patient No. 3, an auditory benefit was observed and still evident even 36 months after activation. Impedances increased progressively in patient No. 1 and a benefit was never reported. Patient No. 2 left the follow-up for worsening comorbidities. Conclusions: CI following transcanal infrapromontorial VS resection is a beneficial intervention. The residual cochlear nerve after the tumour dissection and the course of electrophysiological measurements in the postoperative period were the main predictive factors for audiological outcomes. MDPI 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9844357/ /pubmed/36648922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010001 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dallari, Virginia Apa, Enrico Monzani, Daniele Genovese, Elisabetta Marchioni, Daniele Soloperto, Davide Sacchetto, Luca Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series |
title | Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series |
title_full | Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series |
title_fullStr | Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series |
title_short | Cochlear Implantation Following Transcanal Infrapromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series |
title_sort | cochlear implantation following transcanal infrapromontorial approach for vestibular schwannoma: a case series |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dallarivirginia cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries AT apaenrico cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries AT monzanidaniele cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries AT genoveseelisabetta cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries AT marchionidaniele cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries AT solopertodavide cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries AT sacchettoluca cochlearimplantationfollowingtranscanalinfrapromontorialapproachforvestibularschwannomaacaseseries |