Cargando…

Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles

Self-assembly is usually considered a parallel process while self-folding and origami are usually considered to be serial processes. We believe that these distinctions do not hold in actual experiments. Based upon our experience with 4D printing, we have developed three additional hybrid classes: (1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jungck, John R., Brittain, Stephen, Plante, Donald, Flynn, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010012
_version_ 1784870639298936832
author Jungck, John R.
Brittain, Stephen
Plante, Donald
Flynn, James
author_facet Jungck, John R.
Brittain, Stephen
Plante, Donald
Flynn, James
author_sort Jungck, John R.
collection PubMed
description Self-assembly is usually considered a parallel process while self-folding and origami are usually considered to be serial processes. We believe that these distinctions do not hold in actual experiments. Based upon our experience with 4D printing, we have developed three additional hybrid classes: (1) templated-assisted (tethered) self-assembly: e.g., when RNA is bound to viral capsomeres, the subunits are constricted in their interactions to have aspects of self-folding as well; (2) self-folding can depend upon interactions with the environment; for example, a protein synthesized on a ribosome will fold as soon as peptides enter the intracellular environment in a serial process whereas if denatured complete proteins are put into solution, parallel folding can occur simultaneously; and, (3) in turbulent environments, chaotic conditions continuously alternate processes. We have examined the 43,380 Dürer nets of dodecahedra and 43,380 Dürer nets of icosahedra and their corresponding duals: Schlegel diagrams. In order to better understand models of self-assembly of viral capsids, we have used both geometric (radius of gyration, convex hulls, angles) and topological (vertex connections, leaves, spanning trees, cutting trees, and degree distributions) perspectives to develop design principles for 4D printing experiments. Which configurations fold most rapidly? Which configurations lead to complete polyhedra most of the time? By using Hamiltonian circuits of the vertices of Dürer nets and Eulerian paths of cutting trees of polyhedra unto Schlegel diagrams, we have been able to develop a systematic sampling procedure to explore the 86,760 configurations, models of a T1 viral capsid with 60 subunits and to test alternatives with 4D printing experiments, use of Magforms(TM), and origami models to demonstrate via movies the five processes described above.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9844370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98443702023-01-18 Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles Jungck, John R. Brittain, Stephen Plante, Donald Flynn, James Biomimetics (Basel) Article Self-assembly is usually considered a parallel process while self-folding and origami are usually considered to be serial processes. We believe that these distinctions do not hold in actual experiments. Based upon our experience with 4D printing, we have developed three additional hybrid classes: (1) templated-assisted (tethered) self-assembly: e.g., when RNA is bound to viral capsomeres, the subunits are constricted in their interactions to have aspects of self-folding as well; (2) self-folding can depend upon interactions with the environment; for example, a protein synthesized on a ribosome will fold as soon as peptides enter the intracellular environment in a serial process whereas if denatured complete proteins are put into solution, parallel folding can occur simultaneously; and, (3) in turbulent environments, chaotic conditions continuously alternate processes. We have examined the 43,380 Dürer nets of dodecahedra and 43,380 Dürer nets of icosahedra and their corresponding duals: Schlegel diagrams. In order to better understand models of self-assembly of viral capsids, we have used both geometric (radius of gyration, convex hulls, angles) and topological (vertex connections, leaves, spanning trees, cutting trees, and degree distributions) perspectives to develop design principles for 4D printing experiments. Which configurations fold most rapidly? Which configurations lead to complete polyhedra most of the time? By using Hamiltonian circuits of the vertices of Dürer nets and Eulerian paths of cutting trees of polyhedra unto Schlegel diagrams, we have been able to develop a systematic sampling procedure to explore the 86,760 configurations, models of a T1 viral capsid with 60 subunits and to test alternatives with 4D printing experiments, use of Magforms(TM), and origami models to demonstrate via movies the five processes described above. MDPI 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9844370/ /pubmed/36648798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010012 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jungck, John R.
Brittain, Stephen
Plante, Donald
Flynn, James
Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles
title Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles
title_full Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles
title_fullStr Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles
title_full_unstemmed Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles
title_short Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Origami: Comparative Design Principles
title_sort self-assembly, self-folding, and origami: comparative design principles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36648798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010012
work_keys_str_mv AT jungckjohnr selfassemblyselffoldingandorigamicomparativedesignprinciples
AT brittainstephen selfassemblyselffoldingandorigamicomparativedesignprinciples
AT plantedonald selfassemblyselffoldingandorigamicomparativedesignprinciples
AT flynnjames selfassemblyselffoldingandorigamicomparativedesignprinciples