Cargando…
How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking
Bilateral training systems look to promote the paretic hand’s use in individuals with hemiplegia. Although this is normally achieved using mechanical coupling (i.e., a physical connection between the hands), a virtual reality system relying on virtual coupling (i.e., through a shared virtual object)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Physiological Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36475891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00057.2022 |
_version_ | 1784870678836543488 |
---|---|
author | Peña-Pérez, Nuria Eden, Jonathan Ivanova, Ekaterina Farkhatdinov, Ildar Burdet, Etienne |
author_facet | Peña-Pérez, Nuria Eden, Jonathan Ivanova, Ekaterina Farkhatdinov, Ildar Burdet, Etienne |
author_sort | Peña-Pérez, Nuria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bilateral training systems look to promote the paretic hand’s use in individuals with hemiplegia. Although this is normally achieved using mechanical coupling (i.e., a physical connection between the hands), a virtual reality system relying on virtual coupling (i.e., through a shared virtual object) would be simpler to use and prevent slacking. However, it is not clear whether different coupling modes differently impact task performance and effort distribution between the hands. We explored how 18 healthy right-handed participants changed their motor behaviors in response to the uninstructed addition of mechanical coupling, and virtual coupling using a shared cursor mapped to the average hands’ position. In a second experiment, we then studied the impact of connection stiffness on performance, perception, and effort imbalance. The results indicated that both coupling types can induce the hands to actively contribute to the task. However, the task asymmetry introduced by using a cursor mapped to either the left or right hand only modulated the hands’ contribution when not mechanically coupled. The tracking performance was similar for all coupling types, independent of the connection stiffness, although the mechanical coupling was preferred and induced the hands to move with greater correlation. These findings suggest that virtual coupling can induce the hands to actively contribute to a task in healthy participants without hindering their performance. Further investigation on the coupling types’ impact on the performance and hands’ effort distribution in patients with hemiplegia could allow for the design of simpler training systems that promote the affected hand’s use. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We showed that the uninstructed addition of a virtual and/or a mechanical coupling can induce both hands to actively contribute in a continuous redundant bimanual tracking task without impacting performance. In addition, we showed that the task asymmetry can only alter the effort distribution when the hands are not connected, independent of the connection stiffness. Our findings suggest that virtual coupling could be used in the development of simpler VR-based training devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9844510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Physiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98445102023-01-23 How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking Peña-Pérez, Nuria Eden, Jonathan Ivanova, Ekaterina Farkhatdinov, Ildar Burdet, Etienne J Neurophysiol Research Article Bilateral training systems look to promote the paretic hand’s use in individuals with hemiplegia. Although this is normally achieved using mechanical coupling (i.e., a physical connection between the hands), a virtual reality system relying on virtual coupling (i.e., through a shared virtual object) would be simpler to use and prevent slacking. However, it is not clear whether different coupling modes differently impact task performance and effort distribution between the hands. We explored how 18 healthy right-handed participants changed their motor behaviors in response to the uninstructed addition of mechanical coupling, and virtual coupling using a shared cursor mapped to the average hands’ position. In a second experiment, we then studied the impact of connection stiffness on performance, perception, and effort imbalance. The results indicated that both coupling types can induce the hands to actively contribute to the task. However, the task asymmetry introduced by using a cursor mapped to either the left or right hand only modulated the hands’ contribution when not mechanically coupled. The tracking performance was similar for all coupling types, independent of the connection stiffness, although the mechanical coupling was preferred and induced the hands to move with greater correlation. These findings suggest that virtual coupling can induce the hands to actively contribute to a task in healthy participants without hindering their performance. Further investigation on the coupling types’ impact on the performance and hands’ effort distribution in patients with hemiplegia could allow for the design of simpler training systems that promote the affected hand’s use. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We showed that the uninstructed addition of a virtual and/or a mechanical coupling can induce both hands to actively contribute in a continuous redundant bimanual tracking task without impacting performance. In addition, we showed that the task asymmetry can only alter the effort distribution when the hands are not connected, independent of the connection stiffness. Our findings suggest that virtual coupling could be used in the development of simpler VR-based training devices. American Physiological Society 2023-01-01 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9844510/ /pubmed/36475891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00057.2022 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Published by the American Physiological Society. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peña-Pérez, Nuria Eden, Jonathan Ivanova, Ekaterina Farkhatdinov, Ildar Burdet, Etienne How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking |
title | How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking |
title_full | How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking |
title_fullStr | How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking |
title_short | How virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking |
title_sort | how virtual and mechanical coupling impact bimanual tracking |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36475891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00057.2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penapereznuria howvirtualandmechanicalcouplingimpactbimanualtracking AT edenjonathan howvirtualandmechanicalcouplingimpactbimanualtracking AT ivanovaekaterina howvirtualandmechanicalcouplingimpactbimanualtracking AT farkhatdinovildar howvirtualandmechanicalcouplingimpactbimanualtracking AT burdetetienne howvirtualandmechanicalcouplingimpactbimanualtracking |