Cargando…

Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF), combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) effectively improves the survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC). Selecting patients whose risk of tumor recurrence and metas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qun, Peng, Zhen‐Wei, Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng, Wang, Yan, He, Fang, Zhao, Wen‐Bin, Luo, Wei, Mei, Yong‐Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35674137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4899
_version_ 1784870689568718848
author Zhang, Qun
Peng, Zhen‐Wei
Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng
Wang, Yan
He, Fang
Zhao, Wen‐Bin
Luo, Wei
Mei, Yong‐Yu
author_facet Zhang, Qun
Peng, Zhen‐Wei
Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng
Wang, Yan
He, Fang
Zhao, Wen‐Bin
Luo, Wei
Mei, Yong‐Yu
author_sort Zhang, Qun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF), combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) effectively improves the survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC). Selecting patients whose risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis is high and the appropriate chemotherapy intensity is a concern. We combined tumor‐node‐metastasis staging with the load of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) after IC to select the individualized chemotherapy strength. METHODS: The clinical data and prognostic factors of patients with stage III–IV LA‐NPC treated with TPF IC combined with CCRT were analyzed retrospectively. The conventional treatment group received the standard three cycles TPF IC combined with CCRT. For the new treatment group, the cycles of IC were determined according to whether the EBV‐DNA disappeared completely after a certain course of IC, if so, subsequent IC was stopped and the chemoradiotherapy stage was entered. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a ratio of 1:1 to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes and adverse events between the conventional treatment group and the new method treatment group were compared. RESULTS: The study included 256 patients, among whom 192 were matched successfully into 96 pairs. The patients were followed up for a median of 51 months. The proportions of patients receiving three, two, and one cycle of IC after PSM in the routine and new treatment cohorts were 93.8%, 3.1%, 3.1% versus 21.9%, 49.0%, 24.0%, respectively. However, their 3‐year distant metastasis‐free survival, local recurrence‐free survival, progression‐free survival, and overall survival did not differ significantly. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia toxicity in CCRT decreased significantly in patients receiving the new treatment method compared with that in the conventional treatment group (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Combining TNM stage and EBV‐DNA load after IC to determine the courses of IC in patients with LA‐NPC did not alter the curative effect but decreased toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9844613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98446132023-01-24 Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? Zhang, Qun Peng, Zhen‐Wei Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng Wang, Yan He, Fang Zhao, Wen‐Bin Luo, Wei Mei, Yong‐Yu Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF), combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) effectively improves the survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC). Selecting patients whose risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis is high and the appropriate chemotherapy intensity is a concern. We combined tumor‐node‐metastasis staging with the load of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) after IC to select the individualized chemotherapy strength. METHODS: The clinical data and prognostic factors of patients with stage III–IV LA‐NPC treated with TPF IC combined with CCRT were analyzed retrospectively. The conventional treatment group received the standard three cycles TPF IC combined with CCRT. For the new treatment group, the cycles of IC were determined according to whether the EBV‐DNA disappeared completely after a certain course of IC, if so, subsequent IC was stopped and the chemoradiotherapy stage was entered. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a ratio of 1:1 to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes and adverse events between the conventional treatment group and the new method treatment group were compared. RESULTS: The study included 256 patients, among whom 192 were matched successfully into 96 pairs. The patients were followed up for a median of 51 months. The proportions of patients receiving three, two, and one cycle of IC after PSM in the routine and new treatment cohorts were 93.8%, 3.1%, 3.1% versus 21.9%, 49.0%, 24.0%, respectively. However, their 3‐year distant metastasis‐free survival, local recurrence‐free survival, progression‐free survival, and overall survival did not differ significantly. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia toxicity in CCRT decreased significantly in patients receiving the new treatment method compared with that in the conventional treatment group (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Combining TNM stage and EBV‐DNA load after IC to determine the courses of IC in patients with LA‐NPC did not alter the curative effect but decreased toxicity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9844613/ /pubmed/35674137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4899 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Zhang, Qun
Peng, Zhen‐Wei
Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng
Wang, Yan
He, Fang
Zhao, Wen‐Bin
Luo, Wei
Mei, Yong‐Yu
Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
title Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
title_full Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
title_fullStr Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
title_full_unstemmed Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
title_short Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
title_sort can epstein–barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with american joint committee on cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35674137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4899
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqun canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT pengzhenwei canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT guzhuosheng canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT wangyan canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT hefang canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT zhaowenbin canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT luowei canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT meiyongyu canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma