Cargando…
Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF), combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) effectively improves the survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC). Selecting patients whose risk of tumor recurrence and metas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35674137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4899 |
_version_ | 1784870689568718848 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Qun Peng, Zhen‐Wei Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng Wang, Yan He, Fang Zhao, Wen‐Bin Luo, Wei Mei, Yong‐Yu |
author_facet | Zhang, Qun Peng, Zhen‐Wei Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng Wang, Yan He, Fang Zhao, Wen‐Bin Luo, Wei Mei, Yong‐Yu |
author_sort | Zhang, Qun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF), combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) effectively improves the survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC). Selecting patients whose risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis is high and the appropriate chemotherapy intensity is a concern. We combined tumor‐node‐metastasis staging with the load of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) after IC to select the individualized chemotherapy strength. METHODS: The clinical data and prognostic factors of patients with stage III–IV LA‐NPC treated with TPF IC combined with CCRT were analyzed retrospectively. The conventional treatment group received the standard three cycles TPF IC combined with CCRT. For the new treatment group, the cycles of IC were determined according to whether the EBV‐DNA disappeared completely after a certain course of IC, if so, subsequent IC was stopped and the chemoradiotherapy stage was entered. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a ratio of 1:1 to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes and adverse events between the conventional treatment group and the new method treatment group were compared. RESULTS: The study included 256 patients, among whom 192 were matched successfully into 96 pairs. The patients were followed up for a median of 51 months. The proportions of patients receiving three, two, and one cycle of IC after PSM in the routine and new treatment cohorts were 93.8%, 3.1%, 3.1% versus 21.9%, 49.0%, 24.0%, respectively. However, their 3‐year distant metastasis‐free survival, local recurrence‐free survival, progression‐free survival, and overall survival did not differ significantly. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia toxicity in CCRT decreased significantly in patients receiving the new treatment method compared with that in the conventional treatment group (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Combining TNM stage and EBV‐DNA load after IC to determine the courses of IC in patients with LA‐NPC did not alter the curative effect but decreased toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9844613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98446132023-01-24 Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? Zhang, Qun Peng, Zhen‐Wei Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng Wang, Yan He, Fang Zhao, Wen‐Bin Luo, Wei Mei, Yong‐Yu Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF), combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) effectively improves the survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC). Selecting patients whose risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis is high and the appropriate chemotherapy intensity is a concern. We combined tumor‐node‐metastasis staging with the load of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) after IC to select the individualized chemotherapy strength. METHODS: The clinical data and prognostic factors of patients with stage III–IV LA‐NPC treated with TPF IC combined with CCRT were analyzed retrospectively. The conventional treatment group received the standard three cycles TPF IC combined with CCRT. For the new treatment group, the cycles of IC were determined according to whether the EBV‐DNA disappeared completely after a certain course of IC, if so, subsequent IC was stopped and the chemoradiotherapy stage was entered. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a ratio of 1:1 to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes and adverse events between the conventional treatment group and the new method treatment group were compared. RESULTS: The study included 256 patients, among whom 192 were matched successfully into 96 pairs. The patients were followed up for a median of 51 months. The proportions of patients receiving three, two, and one cycle of IC after PSM in the routine and new treatment cohorts were 93.8%, 3.1%, 3.1% versus 21.9%, 49.0%, 24.0%, respectively. However, their 3‐year distant metastasis‐free survival, local recurrence‐free survival, progression‐free survival, and overall survival did not differ significantly. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia toxicity in CCRT decreased significantly in patients receiving the new treatment method compared with that in the conventional treatment group (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Combining TNM stage and EBV‐DNA load after IC to determine the courses of IC in patients with LA‐NPC did not alter the curative effect but decreased toxicity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9844613/ /pubmed/35674137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4899 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Zhang, Qun Peng, Zhen‐Wei Gu, Zhuo‐Sheng Wang, Yan He, Fang Zhao, Wen‐Bin Luo, Wei Mei, Yong‐Yu Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? |
title | Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? |
title_full | Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? |
title_fullStr | Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? |
title_short | Can Epstein–Barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? |
title_sort | can epstein–barr virus‐deoxyribonucleic acid load after induction chemotherapy combined with american joint committee on cancer stage determine the chemotherapy intensity of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35674137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangqun canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT pengzhenwei canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT guzhuosheng canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT wangyan canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT hefang canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT zhaowenbin canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT luowei canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT meiyongyu canepsteinbarrvirusdeoxyribonucleicacidloadafterinductionchemotherapycombinedwithamericanjointcommitteeoncancerstagedeterminethechemotherapyintensityoflocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma |