Cargando…

Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a group of risk factors that define metabolic dysfunction in adults, is strongly associated with obesity and is an emerging risk factor for cancer. However, the association of MetS and degree of metabolic dysfunction with obesity‐related cancer is unknown. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winn, Maci, Karra, Prasoona, Haaland, Benjamin, Doherty, Jennifer A., Summers, Scott A., Litchman, Michelle L., Gunter, Marc J., Playdon, Mary C., Hardikar, Sheetal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4912
_version_ 1784870691149971456
author Winn, Maci
Karra, Prasoona
Haaland, Benjamin
Doherty, Jennifer A.
Summers, Scott A.
Litchman, Michelle L.
Gunter, Marc J.
Playdon, Mary C.
Hardikar, Sheetal
author_facet Winn, Maci
Karra, Prasoona
Haaland, Benjamin
Doherty, Jennifer A.
Summers, Scott A.
Litchman, Michelle L.
Gunter, Marc J.
Playdon, Mary C.
Hardikar, Sheetal
author_sort Winn, Maci
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a group of risk factors that define metabolic dysfunction in adults, is strongly associated with obesity and is an emerging risk factor for cancer. However, the association of MetS and degree of metabolic dysfunction with obesity‐related cancer is unknown. METHODS: Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 1999 to 2018, we identified 528 obesity‐related cancer cases and 18,972 cancer‐free participants. MetS was defined as the presence of or treatment for ≥3 of hyperglycemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL–cholesterol, and abdominal obesity. A metabolic syndrome score (MSS) was computed as the total number of abnormal MetS parameters to determine the severity of metabolic dysfunction. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. RESULTS: About 45.7% of obesity‐related cancer cases were classified as having MetS compared with only 33.0% of cancer‐free participants. Overall, MetS and MSS were not associated with obesity‐related cancer. However, MSS was associated with higher obesity‐related cancer risk among participants under 50 years of age (OR [95% CI] = 1.28 [1.08–1.52]). When evaluating MSS categorically, compared with healthy participants with no abnormal MetS parameters (MSS = 0), participants with one or two abnormal parameters had a statistically significant higher risk of obesity‐related cancer (OR [95% CI] = 1.73 [1.06–2.83]). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic dysfunction is associated with a higher risk of obesity‐related cancer, particularly in young adults under 50 years of age, and among participants with one or two abnormal metabolic parameters. A more accurate indicator of metabolic dysfunction, beyond metabolic syndrome, is needed to better assist in stratifying individuals for obesity‐related cancer risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9844618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98446182023-01-24 Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Winn, Maci Karra, Prasoona Haaland, Benjamin Doherty, Jennifer A. Summers, Scott A. Litchman, Michelle L. Gunter, Marc J. Playdon, Mary C. Hardikar, Sheetal Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a group of risk factors that define metabolic dysfunction in adults, is strongly associated with obesity and is an emerging risk factor for cancer. However, the association of MetS and degree of metabolic dysfunction with obesity‐related cancer is unknown. METHODS: Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 1999 to 2018, we identified 528 obesity‐related cancer cases and 18,972 cancer‐free participants. MetS was defined as the presence of or treatment for ≥3 of hyperglycemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL–cholesterol, and abdominal obesity. A metabolic syndrome score (MSS) was computed as the total number of abnormal MetS parameters to determine the severity of metabolic dysfunction. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. RESULTS: About 45.7% of obesity‐related cancer cases were classified as having MetS compared with only 33.0% of cancer‐free participants. Overall, MetS and MSS were not associated with obesity‐related cancer. However, MSS was associated with higher obesity‐related cancer risk among participants under 50 years of age (OR [95% CI] = 1.28 [1.08–1.52]). When evaluating MSS categorically, compared with healthy participants with no abnormal MetS parameters (MSS = 0), participants with one or two abnormal parameters had a statistically significant higher risk of obesity‐related cancer (OR [95% CI] = 1.73 [1.06–2.83]). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic dysfunction is associated with a higher risk of obesity‐related cancer, particularly in young adults under 50 years of age, and among participants with one or two abnormal metabolic parameters. A more accurate indicator of metabolic dysfunction, beyond metabolic syndrome, is needed to better assist in stratifying individuals for obesity‐related cancer risk. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9844618/ /pubmed/35719035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4912 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Winn, Maci
Karra, Prasoona
Haaland, Benjamin
Doherty, Jennifer A.
Summers, Scott A.
Litchman, Michelle L.
Gunter, Marc J.
Playdon, Mary C.
Hardikar, Sheetal
Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_full Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_fullStr Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_full_unstemmed Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_short Metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
title_sort metabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: results from the cross‐sectional national health and nutrition examination survey
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4912
work_keys_str_mv AT winnmaci metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT karraprasoona metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT haalandbenjamin metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT dohertyjennifera metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT summersscotta metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT litchmanmichellel metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT guntermarcj metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT playdonmaryc metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey
AT hardikarsheetal metabolicdysfunctionandobesityrelatedcancerresultsfromthecrosssectionalnationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurvey