Cargando…
The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: The relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta‐analysis was aimed to determine the association between SNPs and OC risk. METHODS: Several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, China National...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4891 |
_version_ | 1784870692140875776 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Jia Xu, Zhe Ye, Zhuomiao Li, Jin Hao, Zhinan Wang, Yongjun |
author_facet | Hu, Jia Xu, Zhe Ye, Zhuomiao Li, Jin Hao, Zhinan Wang, Yongjun |
author_sort | Hu, Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta‐analysis was aimed to determine the association between SNPs and OC risk. METHODS: Several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine disc) were searched to summarize the association between SNPs and OC published throughout April 2021. Direct meta‐analysis was used to identify SNPs that could predict the incidence of OC. Ranking probability resulting from network meta‐analysis and the Thakkinstian’s algorithm was used to select the most appropriate gene model. The false positive report probability (FPRP) and Venice criteria were further tested for credible relationships. Subgroup analysis was also carried out to explore whether there are racial differences. RESULTS: A total of 63 genes and 92 SNPs were included in our study after careful consideration. Fok1 rs2228570 is likely a dominant risk factor for the development of OC compared to other selected genes. The dominant gene model of Fok1 rs2228570 (pooled OR = 1.158, 95% CI: 1.068–1.256) was determined to be the most suitable model with a FPRP <0.2 and moderate credibility. CONCLUSIONS: Fok1 rs2228570 is closely linked to OC risk, and the dominant gene model is likely the most appropriate model for estimating OC susceptibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9844622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98446222023-01-24 The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis Hu, Jia Xu, Zhe Ye, Zhuomiao Li, Jin Hao, Zhinan Wang, Yongjun Cancer Med REVIEW BACKGROUND: The relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta‐analysis was aimed to determine the association between SNPs and OC risk. METHODS: Several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine disc) were searched to summarize the association between SNPs and OC published throughout April 2021. Direct meta‐analysis was used to identify SNPs that could predict the incidence of OC. Ranking probability resulting from network meta‐analysis and the Thakkinstian’s algorithm was used to select the most appropriate gene model. The false positive report probability (FPRP) and Venice criteria were further tested for credible relationships. Subgroup analysis was also carried out to explore whether there are racial differences. RESULTS: A total of 63 genes and 92 SNPs were included in our study after careful consideration. Fok1 rs2228570 is likely a dominant risk factor for the development of OC compared to other selected genes. The dominant gene model of Fok1 rs2228570 (pooled OR = 1.158, 95% CI: 1.068–1.256) was determined to be the most suitable model with a FPRP <0.2 and moderate credibility. CONCLUSIONS: Fok1 rs2228570 is closely linked to OC risk, and the dominant gene model is likely the most appropriate model for estimating OC susceptibility. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9844622/ /pubmed/35637613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4891 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | REVIEW Hu, Jia Xu, Zhe Ye, Zhuomiao Li, Jin Hao, Zhinan Wang, Yongjun The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
title | The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
title_full | The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
title_short | The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
title_sort | association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
topic | REVIEW |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4891 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hujia theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xuzhe theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yezhuomiao theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT lijin theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT haozhinan theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangyongjun theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hujia associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xuzhe associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yezhuomiao associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT lijin associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT haozhinan associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangyongjun associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |