Cargando…

The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: The relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta‐analysis was aimed to determine the association between SNPs and OC risk. METHODS: Several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, China National...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Jia, Xu, Zhe, Ye, Zhuomiao, Li, Jin, Hao, Zhinan, Wang, Yongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4891
_version_ 1784870692140875776
author Hu, Jia
Xu, Zhe
Ye, Zhuomiao
Li, Jin
Hao, Zhinan
Wang, Yongjun
author_facet Hu, Jia
Xu, Zhe
Ye, Zhuomiao
Li, Jin
Hao, Zhinan
Wang, Yongjun
author_sort Hu, Jia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta‐analysis was aimed to determine the association between SNPs and OC risk. METHODS: Several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine disc) were searched to summarize the association between SNPs and OC published throughout April 2021. Direct meta‐analysis was used to identify SNPs that could predict the incidence of OC. Ranking probability resulting from network meta‐analysis and the Thakkinstian’s algorithm was used to select the most appropriate gene model. The false positive report probability (FPRP) and Venice criteria were further tested for credible relationships. Subgroup analysis was also carried out to explore whether there are racial differences. RESULTS: A total of 63 genes and 92 SNPs were included in our study after careful consideration. Fok1 rs2228570 is likely a dominant risk factor for the development of OC compared to other selected genes. The dominant gene model of Fok1 rs2228570 (pooled OR = 1.158, 95% CI: 1.068–1.256) was determined to be the most suitable model with a FPRP <0.2 and moderate credibility. CONCLUSIONS: Fok1 rs2228570 is closely linked to OC risk, and the dominant gene model is likely the most appropriate model for estimating OC susceptibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9844622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98446222023-01-24 The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis Hu, Jia Xu, Zhe Ye, Zhuomiao Li, Jin Hao, Zhinan Wang, Yongjun Cancer Med REVIEW BACKGROUND: The relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta‐analysis was aimed to determine the association between SNPs and OC risk. METHODS: Several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine disc) were searched to summarize the association between SNPs and OC published throughout April 2021. Direct meta‐analysis was used to identify SNPs that could predict the incidence of OC. Ranking probability resulting from network meta‐analysis and the Thakkinstian’s algorithm was used to select the most appropriate gene model. The false positive report probability (FPRP) and Venice criteria were further tested for credible relationships. Subgroup analysis was also carried out to explore whether there are racial differences. RESULTS: A total of 63 genes and 92 SNPs were included in our study after careful consideration. Fok1 rs2228570 is likely a dominant risk factor for the development of OC compared to other selected genes. The dominant gene model of Fok1 rs2228570 (pooled OR = 1.158, 95% CI: 1.068–1.256) was determined to be the most suitable model with a FPRP <0.2 and moderate credibility. CONCLUSIONS: Fok1 rs2228570 is closely linked to OC risk, and the dominant gene model is likely the most appropriate model for estimating OC susceptibility. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9844622/ /pubmed/35637613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4891 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle REVIEW
Hu, Jia
Xu, Zhe
Ye, Zhuomiao
Li, Jin
Hao, Zhinan
Wang, Yongjun
The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_short The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
title_sort association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
topic REVIEW
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35637613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4891
work_keys_str_mv AT hujia theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xuzhe theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yezhuomiao theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lijin theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT haozhinan theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangyongjun theassociationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hujia associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xuzhe associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yezhuomiao associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lijin associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT haozhinan associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangyongjun associationbetweensinglenucleotidepolymorphismsandovariancancerriskasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis