Cargando…

Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring

BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a criti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Matthew J., Anderson, Melissa L., Cook, Andrea J., Ehrlich, Kelly, Hall, Yoshio N., Hsu, Clarissa, Margolis, Karen L., McClure, Jennifer B., Munson, Sean A., Green, Beverly B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3
_version_ 1784870796004425728
author Thompson, Matthew J.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Cook, Andrea J.
Ehrlich, Kelly
Hall, Yoshio N.
Hsu, Clarissa
Margolis, Karen L.
McClure, Jennifer B.
Munson, Sean A.
Green, Beverly B.
author_facet Thompson, Matthew J.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Cook, Andrea J.
Ehrlich, Kelly
Hall, Yoshio N.
Hsu, Clarissa
Margolis, Karen L.
McClure, Jennifer B.
Munson, Sean A.
Green, Beverly B.
author_sort Thompson, Matthew J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a critical factor for implementation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptability and adherence of clinic, home, kiosk, and ABPM measurement. DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy study which randomized adults to one of three BP measurement arms: clinic, home, and kiosk. ABPM was conducted on all participants. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18–85 years) receiving care at 12 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care clinics (Washington State, USA) with a high BP (≥ 138 mmHg systolic or ≥ 88 mmHg diastolic) in the electronic health record with no hypertension diagnosis and on no hypertensive medications and with high BP at a research screening visit. MEASURES: Patient acceptability was measured using a validated survey which was used to calculate an overall acceptability score (range 1–7) at baseline, after completing their assigned BP measurement intervention, and after completing ABPM. Adherence was defined based on the pre-specified number of BP measurements completed. KEY RESULTS: Five hundred ten participants were randomized (mean age 59 years), with mean BP of 150/88. Overall acceptability score was highest (i.e. most acceptable) for Home BP (mean 6.2, SD 0.7) and lowest (least acceptable) for ABPM (mean 5.0, SD 1.0); scores were intermediate for Clinic (5.5, SD 1.1) and Kiosk (5.4, SD 1.0). Adherence was higher for Home (154/170, 90.6%) and Clinic (150/172, 87.2%) than for Kiosk (114/168, 67.9%)). The majority of participants (467/510, 91.6%) were adherent to ABPM. Conclusions: Participants found home BP measurement most acceptable followed by clinic, BP kiosks, and ABPM. Our findings, coupled with recent evidence regarding the accuracy of home BP measurement, further support the routine use of home-based BP measurement in primary care practice in the US. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130257 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03130257 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9845022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98450222023-01-18 Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring Thompson, Matthew J. Anderson, Melissa L. Cook, Andrea J. Ehrlich, Kelly Hall, Yoshio N. Hsu, Clarissa Margolis, Karen L. McClure, Jennifer B. Munson, Sean A. Green, Beverly B. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a critical factor for implementation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptability and adherence of clinic, home, kiosk, and ABPM measurement. DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy study which randomized adults to one of three BP measurement arms: clinic, home, and kiosk. ABPM was conducted on all participants. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18–85 years) receiving care at 12 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care clinics (Washington State, USA) with a high BP (≥ 138 mmHg systolic or ≥ 88 mmHg diastolic) in the electronic health record with no hypertension diagnosis and on no hypertensive medications and with high BP at a research screening visit. MEASURES: Patient acceptability was measured using a validated survey which was used to calculate an overall acceptability score (range 1–7) at baseline, after completing their assigned BP measurement intervention, and after completing ABPM. Adherence was defined based on the pre-specified number of BP measurements completed. KEY RESULTS: Five hundred ten participants were randomized (mean age 59 years), with mean BP of 150/88. Overall acceptability score was highest (i.e. most acceptable) for Home BP (mean 6.2, SD 0.7) and lowest (least acceptable) for ABPM (mean 5.0, SD 1.0); scores were intermediate for Clinic (5.5, SD 1.1) and Kiosk (5.4, SD 1.0). Adherence was higher for Home (154/170, 90.6%) and Clinic (150/172, 87.2%) than for Kiosk (114/168, 67.9%)). The majority of participants (467/510, 91.6%) were adherent to ABPM. Conclusions: Participants found home BP measurement most acceptable followed by clinic, BP kiosks, and ABPM. Our findings, coupled with recent evidence regarding the accuracy of home BP measurement, further support the routine use of home-based BP measurement in primary care practice in the US. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130257 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03130257 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-17 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9845022/ /pubmed/36650328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
spellingShingle Original Research
Thompson, Matthew J.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Cook, Andrea J.
Ehrlich, Kelly
Hall, Yoshio N.
Hsu, Clarissa
Margolis, Karen L.
McClure, Jennifer B.
Munson, Sean A.
Green, Beverly B.
Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
title Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
title_full Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
title_fullStr Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
title_short Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
title_sort acceptability and adherence to home, kiosk, and clinic blood pressure measurement compared to 24-h ambulatory monitoring
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonmatthewj acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT andersonmelissal acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT cookandreaj acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT ehrlichkelly acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT hallyoshion acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT hsuclarissa acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT margoliskarenl acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT mcclurejenniferb acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT munsonseana acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring
AT greenbeverlyb acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring