Cargando…
Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring
BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a criti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3 |
_version_ | 1784870796004425728 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Matthew J. Anderson, Melissa L. Cook, Andrea J. Ehrlich, Kelly Hall, Yoshio N. Hsu, Clarissa Margolis, Karen L. McClure, Jennifer B. Munson, Sean A. Green, Beverly B. |
author_facet | Thompson, Matthew J. Anderson, Melissa L. Cook, Andrea J. Ehrlich, Kelly Hall, Yoshio N. Hsu, Clarissa Margolis, Karen L. McClure, Jennifer B. Munson, Sean A. Green, Beverly B. |
author_sort | Thompson, Matthew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a critical factor for implementation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptability and adherence of clinic, home, kiosk, and ABPM measurement. DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy study which randomized adults to one of three BP measurement arms: clinic, home, and kiosk. ABPM was conducted on all participants. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18–85 years) receiving care at 12 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care clinics (Washington State, USA) with a high BP (≥ 138 mmHg systolic or ≥ 88 mmHg diastolic) in the electronic health record with no hypertension diagnosis and on no hypertensive medications and with high BP at a research screening visit. MEASURES: Patient acceptability was measured using a validated survey which was used to calculate an overall acceptability score (range 1–7) at baseline, after completing their assigned BP measurement intervention, and after completing ABPM. Adherence was defined based on the pre-specified number of BP measurements completed. KEY RESULTS: Five hundred ten participants were randomized (mean age 59 years), with mean BP of 150/88. Overall acceptability score was highest (i.e. most acceptable) for Home BP (mean 6.2, SD 0.7) and lowest (least acceptable) for ABPM (mean 5.0, SD 1.0); scores were intermediate for Clinic (5.5, SD 1.1) and Kiosk (5.4, SD 1.0). Adherence was higher for Home (154/170, 90.6%) and Clinic (150/172, 87.2%) than for Kiosk (114/168, 67.9%)). The majority of participants (467/510, 91.6%) were adherent to ABPM. Conclusions: Participants found home BP measurement most acceptable followed by clinic, BP kiosks, and ABPM. Our findings, coupled with recent evidence regarding the accuracy of home BP measurement, further support the routine use of home-based BP measurement in primary care practice in the US. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130257 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03130257 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9845022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98450222023-01-18 Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring Thompson, Matthew J. Anderson, Melissa L. Cook, Andrea J. Ehrlich, Kelly Hall, Yoshio N. Hsu, Clarissa Margolis, Karen L. McClure, Jennifer B. Munson, Sean A. Green, Beverly B. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a critical factor for implementation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptability and adherence of clinic, home, kiosk, and ABPM measurement. DESIGN: Comparative diagnostic accuracy study which randomized adults to one of three BP measurement arms: clinic, home, and kiosk. ABPM was conducted on all participants. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18–85 years) receiving care at 12 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care clinics (Washington State, USA) with a high BP (≥ 138 mmHg systolic or ≥ 88 mmHg diastolic) in the electronic health record with no hypertension diagnosis and on no hypertensive medications and with high BP at a research screening visit. MEASURES: Patient acceptability was measured using a validated survey which was used to calculate an overall acceptability score (range 1–7) at baseline, after completing their assigned BP measurement intervention, and after completing ABPM. Adherence was defined based on the pre-specified number of BP measurements completed. KEY RESULTS: Five hundred ten participants were randomized (mean age 59 years), with mean BP of 150/88. Overall acceptability score was highest (i.e. most acceptable) for Home BP (mean 6.2, SD 0.7) and lowest (least acceptable) for ABPM (mean 5.0, SD 1.0); scores were intermediate for Clinic (5.5, SD 1.1) and Kiosk (5.4, SD 1.0). Adherence was higher for Home (154/170, 90.6%) and Clinic (150/172, 87.2%) than for Kiosk (114/168, 67.9%)). The majority of participants (467/510, 91.6%) were adherent to ABPM. Conclusions: Participants found home BP measurement most acceptable followed by clinic, BP kiosks, and ABPM. Our findings, coupled with recent evidence regarding the accuracy of home BP measurement, further support the routine use of home-based BP measurement in primary care practice in the US. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130257 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03130257 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-17 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9845022/ /pubmed/36650328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Thompson, Matthew J. Anderson, Melissa L. Cook, Andrea J. Ehrlich, Kelly Hall, Yoshio N. Hsu, Clarissa Margolis, Karen L. McClure, Jennifer B. Munson, Sean A. Green, Beverly B. Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring |
title | Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_full | Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_fullStr | Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_short | Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring |
title_sort | acceptability and adherence to home, kiosk, and clinic blood pressure measurement compared to 24-h ambulatory monitoring |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonmatthewj acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT andersonmelissal acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT cookandreaj acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT ehrlichkelly acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT hallyoshion acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT hsuclarissa acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT margoliskarenl acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT mcclurejenniferb acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT munsonseana acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring AT greenbeverlyb acceptabilityandadherencetohomekioskandclinicbloodpressuremeasurementcomparedto24hambulatorymonitoring |