Cargando…
Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract
To identify a spoken word (e.g., dog), people must categorize the speech steam onto distinct units (e.g., contrast dog/fog,) and extract their combinatorial structure (e.g., distinguish dog/god). However, the mechanisms that support these two core functions are not fully understood. Here, we explore...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28099-w |
_version_ | 1784870875897528320 |
---|---|
author | Berent, Iris Fried, Peter J. Theodore, Rachel M. Manning, Daniel Pascual-Leone, Alvaro |
author_facet | Berent, Iris Fried, Peter J. Theodore, Rachel M. Manning, Daniel Pascual-Leone, Alvaro |
author_sort | Berent, Iris |
collection | PubMed |
description | To identify a spoken word (e.g., dog), people must categorize the speech steam onto distinct units (e.g., contrast dog/fog,) and extract their combinatorial structure (e.g., distinguish dog/god). However, the mechanisms that support these two core functions are not fully understood. Here, we explore this question using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We show that speech categorization engages the motor system, as stimulating the lip motor area has opposite effects on labial (ba/pa)- and coronal (da/ta) sounds. In contrast, the combinatorial computation of syllable structure engages Broca’s area, as its stimulation disrupts sensitivity to syllable structure (compared to motor stimulation). We conclude that the two ingredients of language—categorization and combination—are distinct functions in human brains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9845317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98453172023-01-19 Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract Berent, Iris Fried, Peter J. Theodore, Rachel M. Manning, Daniel Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Sci Rep Article To identify a spoken word (e.g., dog), people must categorize the speech steam onto distinct units (e.g., contrast dog/fog,) and extract their combinatorial structure (e.g., distinguish dog/god). However, the mechanisms that support these two core functions are not fully understood. Here, we explore this question using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We show that speech categorization engages the motor system, as stimulating the lip motor area has opposite effects on labial (ba/pa)- and coronal (da/ta) sounds. In contrast, the combinatorial computation of syllable structure engages Broca’s area, as its stimulation disrupts sensitivity to syllable structure (compared to motor stimulation). We conclude that the two ingredients of language—categorization and combination—are distinct functions in human brains. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9845317/ /pubmed/36650234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28099-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Berent, Iris Fried, Peter J. Theodore, Rachel M. Manning, Daniel Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract |
title | Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract |
title_full | Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract |
title_fullStr | Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract |
title_full_unstemmed | Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract |
title_short | Phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract |
title_sort | phonetic categorization relies on motor simulation, but combinatorial phonological computations are abstract |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28099-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berentiris phoneticcategorizationreliesonmotorsimulationbutcombinatorialphonologicalcomputationsareabstract AT friedpeterj phoneticcategorizationreliesonmotorsimulationbutcombinatorialphonologicalcomputationsareabstract AT theodorerachelm phoneticcategorizationreliesonmotorsimulationbutcombinatorialphonologicalcomputationsareabstract AT manningdaniel phoneticcategorizationreliesonmotorsimulationbutcombinatorialphonologicalcomputationsareabstract AT pascualleonealvaro phoneticcategorizationreliesonmotorsimulationbutcombinatorialphonologicalcomputationsareabstract |