Cargando…
Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
INTRODUCTION: The optimal pain management strategy after lung transplantation is unknown. This study compared analgesic outcomes of intercostal nerve blockade by cryoanalgesia (Cryo) versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). METHODS: Seventy-two patients who underwent bilateral lung transplantation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00448-z |
_version_ | 1784870909999316992 |
---|---|
author | Isaza, Erin Santos, Jesse Haro, Greg J. Chen, Joy Weber, Daniel J. Deuse, Tobias Singer, Jonathan P. Golden, Jeffrey A. Hays, Steven Trinh, Binh N. Brzezinski, Marek Kukreja, Jasleen |
author_facet | Isaza, Erin Santos, Jesse Haro, Greg J. Chen, Joy Weber, Daniel J. Deuse, Tobias Singer, Jonathan P. Golden, Jeffrey A. Hays, Steven Trinh, Binh N. Brzezinski, Marek Kukreja, Jasleen |
author_sort | Isaza, Erin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The optimal pain management strategy after lung transplantation is unknown. This study compared analgesic outcomes of intercostal nerve blockade by cryoanalgesia (Cryo) versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). METHODS: Seventy-two patients who underwent bilateral lung transplantation via clamshell incision at our center from 2016 to 2018 were managed with TEA (N = 43) or Cryo (N = 29). We evaluated analgesic-specific complications, opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (OME), and pain scores (0–10) through postoperative day 7. Adjusted linear regression was used to assess for non-inferiority of Cryo to TEA. RESULTS: The overall mean pain scores (Cryo 3.2 vs TEA 3.8, P = 0.21), maximum mean pain scores (Cryo 4.7 vs TEA 5.5, P = 0.16), and the total opioid use (Cryo 484 vs TEA 705 OME, P = 0.12) were similar in both groups, while the utilization of postoperative opioid-sparing analgesia, measured as use of lidocaine patches, was lower in the Cryo group (Cryo 21% vs TEA 84%, P < 0.001). Analgesic outcomes remained similar between the cohorts after adjustment for pertinent patient and analgesic characteristics (P = 0.26), as well as after exclusion of Cryo patients requiring rescue TEA (P = 0.32). There were no Cryo complications, with four patients requiring subsequent TEA for pain control. Two TEA patients experienced hemodynamic instability following a test TEA bolus requiring code measures. Additionally, TEA placement was delayed beyond postoperative day 1 in 33% owing to need for anticoagulation or clinical instability. CONCLUSIONS: In lung transplantation, Cryo was found to be safe with analgesic effectiveness similar to TEA. Cryo may be advantageous in this complex patient population, as it can be used in all clinical scenarios and eliminates risks and delays associated with TEA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-022-00448-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9845479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98454792023-01-19 Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Isaza, Erin Santos, Jesse Haro, Greg J. Chen, Joy Weber, Daniel J. Deuse, Tobias Singer, Jonathan P. Golden, Jeffrey A. Hays, Steven Trinh, Binh N. Brzezinski, Marek Kukreja, Jasleen Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The optimal pain management strategy after lung transplantation is unknown. This study compared analgesic outcomes of intercostal nerve blockade by cryoanalgesia (Cryo) versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). METHODS: Seventy-two patients who underwent bilateral lung transplantation via clamshell incision at our center from 2016 to 2018 were managed with TEA (N = 43) or Cryo (N = 29). We evaluated analgesic-specific complications, opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (OME), and pain scores (0–10) through postoperative day 7. Adjusted linear regression was used to assess for non-inferiority of Cryo to TEA. RESULTS: The overall mean pain scores (Cryo 3.2 vs TEA 3.8, P = 0.21), maximum mean pain scores (Cryo 4.7 vs TEA 5.5, P = 0.16), and the total opioid use (Cryo 484 vs TEA 705 OME, P = 0.12) were similar in both groups, while the utilization of postoperative opioid-sparing analgesia, measured as use of lidocaine patches, was lower in the Cryo group (Cryo 21% vs TEA 84%, P < 0.001). Analgesic outcomes remained similar between the cohorts after adjustment for pertinent patient and analgesic characteristics (P = 0.26), as well as after exclusion of Cryo patients requiring rescue TEA (P = 0.32). There were no Cryo complications, with four patients requiring subsequent TEA for pain control. Two TEA patients experienced hemodynamic instability following a test TEA bolus requiring code measures. Additionally, TEA placement was delayed beyond postoperative day 1 in 33% owing to need for anticoagulation or clinical instability. CONCLUSIONS: In lung transplantation, Cryo was found to be safe with analgesic effectiveness similar to TEA. Cryo may be advantageous in this complex patient population, as it can be used in all clinical scenarios and eliminates risks and delays associated with TEA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-022-00448-z. Springer Healthcare 2022-10-23 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9845479/ /pubmed/36274081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00448-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Isaza, Erin Santos, Jesse Haro, Greg J. Chen, Joy Weber, Daniel J. Deuse, Tobias Singer, Jonathan P. Golden, Jeffrey A. Hays, Steven Trinh, Binh N. Brzezinski, Marek Kukreja, Jasleen Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title | Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_full | Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_fullStr | Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_short | Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study |
title_sort | intercostal nerve cryoanalgesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia in lung transplantation: a retrospective single-center study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00448-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isazaerin intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT santosjesse intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT harogregj intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT chenjoy intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT weberdanielj intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT deusetobias intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT singerjonathanp intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT goldenjeffreya intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT hayssteven intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT trinhbinhn intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT brzezinskimarek intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy AT kukrejajasleen intercostalnervecryoanalgesiaversusthoracicepiduralanalgesiainlungtransplantationaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy |