Cargando…

Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability

Reproductive costs represent a significant proportion of a mammalian female's energy budget. Estimates of reproductive costs are needed for understanding how alterations to energy budgets, such as those from environmental variation or human activities, impact maternal body condition, vital rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McHuron, Elizabeth A, Adamczak, Stephanie, Costa, Daniel P, Booth, Cormac
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac080
_version_ 1784871040403374080
author McHuron, Elizabeth A
Adamczak, Stephanie
Costa, Daniel P
Booth, Cormac
author_facet McHuron, Elizabeth A
Adamczak, Stephanie
Costa, Daniel P
Booth, Cormac
author_sort McHuron, Elizabeth A
collection PubMed
description Reproductive costs represent a significant proportion of a mammalian female's energy budget. Estimates of reproductive costs are needed for understanding how alterations to energy budgets, such as those from environmental variation or human activities, impact maternal body condition, vital rates and population dynamics. Such questions are increasingly important for marine mammals, as many populations are faced with rapidly changing and increasingly disturbed environments. Here we review the different energetic costs that marine mammals incur during gestation and lactation and how those costs are typically estimated in bioenergetic models. We compiled data availability on key model parameters for each species across all six marine mammal taxonomic groups (mysticetes, odontocetes, pinnipeds, sirenians, mustelids and ursids). Pinnipeds were the best-represented group regarding data availability, including estimates of milk intake, milk composition, lactation duration, birth mass, body composition at birth and growth. There were still considerable data gaps, particularly for polar species, and good data were only available across all parameters in 45% of pinniped species. Cetaceans and sirenians were comparatively data-poor, with some species having little or no data for any parameters, particularly beaked whales. Even for species with moderate data coverage, many parameter estimates were tentative or based on indirect approaches, necessitating reevaluation of these estimates. We discuss mechanisms and factors that affect maternal energy investment or prey requirements during reproduction, such as prey supplementation by offspring, metabolic compensation, environmental conditions and maternal characteristics. Filling the existing data gaps highlighted in this review, particularly for parameters that are influential on bioenergetic model outputs, will help refine reproductive costs estimated from bioenergetic models and better address how and when energy imbalances are likely to affect marine mammal populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9845964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98459642023-01-20 Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability McHuron, Elizabeth A Adamczak, Stephanie Costa, Daniel P Booth, Cormac Conserv Physiol Review Reproductive costs represent a significant proportion of a mammalian female's energy budget. Estimates of reproductive costs are needed for understanding how alterations to energy budgets, such as those from environmental variation or human activities, impact maternal body condition, vital rates and population dynamics. Such questions are increasingly important for marine mammals, as many populations are faced with rapidly changing and increasingly disturbed environments. Here we review the different energetic costs that marine mammals incur during gestation and lactation and how those costs are typically estimated in bioenergetic models. We compiled data availability on key model parameters for each species across all six marine mammal taxonomic groups (mysticetes, odontocetes, pinnipeds, sirenians, mustelids and ursids). Pinnipeds were the best-represented group regarding data availability, including estimates of milk intake, milk composition, lactation duration, birth mass, body composition at birth and growth. There were still considerable data gaps, particularly for polar species, and good data were only available across all parameters in 45% of pinniped species. Cetaceans and sirenians were comparatively data-poor, with some species having little or no data for any parameters, particularly beaked whales. Even for species with moderate data coverage, many parameter estimates were tentative or based on indirect approaches, necessitating reevaluation of these estimates. We discuss mechanisms and factors that affect maternal energy investment or prey requirements during reproduction, such as prey supplementation by offspring, metabolic compensation, environmental conditions and maternal characteristics. Filling the existing data gaps highlighted in this review, particularly for parameters that are influential on bioenergetic model outputs, will help refine reproductive costs estimated from bioenergetic models and better address how and when energy imbalances are likely to affect marine mammal populations. Oxford University Press 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9845964/ /pubmed/36685328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac080 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
McHuron, Elizabeth A
Adamczak, Stephanie
Costa, Daniel P
Booth, Cormac
Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability
title Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability
title_full Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability
title_fullStr Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability
title_full_unstemmed Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability
title_short Estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability
title_sort estimating reproductive costs in marine mammal bioenergetic models: a review of current knowledge and data availability
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac080
work_keys_str_mv AT mchuronelizabetha estimatingreproductivecostsinmarinemammalbioenergeticmodelsareviewofcurrentknowledgeanddataavailability
AT adamczakstephanie estimatingreproductivecostsinmarinemammalbioenergeticmodelsareviewofcurrentknowledgeanddataavailability
AT costadanielp estimatingreproductivecostsinmarinemammalbioenergeticmodelsareviewofcurrentknowledgeanddataavailability
AT boothcormac estimatingreproductivecostsinmarinemammalbioenergeticmodelsareviewofcurrentknowledgeanddataavailability