Cargando…

Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an often performed procedure in spine neurosurgery. These are often performed using an operating microscope (OM) for better illumination and visualization. But its use is limited to the surgeon and the assistant. There is difficulty in ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Encarnacion Ramirez, Manuel, Peralta Baez, Ismael, Nurmukhametov, Renat, Goncharov, Efgeni, Efe, Ibrahim E., Sufianov, Albert, Ramirez Pena, Issael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1055189
_version_ 1784871114367827968
author Encarnacion Ramirez, Manuel
Peralta Baez, Ismael
Nurmukhametov, Renat
Goncharov, Efgeni
Efe, Ibrahim E.
Sufianov, Albert
Ramirez Pena, Issael
author_facet Encarnacion Ramirez, Manuel
Peralta Baez, Ismael
Nurmukhametov, Renat
Goncharov, Efgeni
Efe, Ibrahim E.
Sufianov, Albert
Ramirez Pena, Issael
author_sort Encarnacion Ramirez, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an often performed procedure in spine neurosurgery. These are often performed using an operating microscope (OM) for better illumination and visualization. But its use is limited to the surgeon and the assistant. There is difficulty in maneuvering long surgical instruments due to the limited space available. Exoscope (EX) has been used as an alternative to microscopes and endoscopes. We used an EX in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: A prospective comparative trial was conducted to test the safety and usability of a low-cost EX compared to a conventional surgical binocular OM in ACDF. Twenty-six patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy symptoms were operated by ACDF assisted by the EX and OM between December 2021 and June 2022. The authors collected and compared data on operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, hospital admission, and complications in the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean operative time, hospital stay, or postoperative complications. The average intraoperative blood loss was significantly more in the OM group. There were no surgical complications related to the use of the EX or OM. The comfort level, preoperative setup and intraoperative adjustment of position and angle of the EX were rated higher than the OM group. The image quality, depth perception, and illumination were rated as inferior to that of the OM. The low-cost EX was rated to be superior to that of the OM with regard to education and training purposes. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the low-cost EX appears to be a safe and effective alternative for OM-assisted ACDF with great comfort and ergonomics and serves as an essential tool for education and training purposes. However, some limitations of our EX included slightly inferior image quality and illumination when compared with the OM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9846206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98462062023-01-19 Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) Encarnacion Ramirez, Manuel Peralta Baez, Ismael Nurmukhametov, Renat Goncharov, Efgeni Efe, Ibrahim E. Sufianov, Albert Ramirez Pena, Issael Front Med Technol Medical Technology BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an often performed procedure in spine neurosurgery. These are often performed using an operating microscope (OM) for better illumination and visualization. But its use is limited to the surgeon and the assistant. There is difficulty in maneuvering long surgical instruments due to the limited space available. Exoscope (EX) has been used as an alternative to microscopes and endoscopes. We used an EX in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: A prospective comparative trial was conducted to test the safety and usability of a low-cost EX compared to a conventional surgical binocular OM in ACDF. Twenty-six patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy symptoms were operated by ACDF assisted by the EX and OM between December 2021 and June 2022. The authors collected and compared data on operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, hospital admission, and complications in the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean operative time, hospital stay, or postoperative complications. The average intraoperative blood loss was significantly more in the OM group. There were no surgical complications related to the use of the EX or OM. The comfort level, preoperative setup and intraoperative adjustment of position and angle of the EX were rated higher than the OM group. The image quality, depth perception, and illumination were rated as inferior to that of the OM. The low-cost EX was rated to be superior to that of the OM with regard to education and training purposes. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the low-cost EX appears to be a safe and effective alternative for OM-assisted ACDF with great comfort and ergonomics and serves as an essential tool for education and training purposes. However, some limitations of our EX included slightly inferior image quality and illumination when compared with the OM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846206/ /pubmed/36688142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1055189 Text en © 2023 Encarnacion Ramirez, Peralta Baez, Nurmukhametov, Goncharov, Efe, Sufianov and Ramirez Pena. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medical Technology
Encarnacion Ramirez, Manuel
Peralta Baez, Ismael
Nurmukhametov, Renat
Goncharov, Efgeni
Efe, Ibrahim E.
Sufianov, Albert
Ramirez Pena, Issael
Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
title Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
title_full Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
title_fullStr Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
title_short Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
title_sort comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (acdf)
topic Medical Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1055189
work_keys_str_mv AT encarnacionramirezmanuel comparativesurveystudyoftheuseofalowcostexoscopevsmicroscopeforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdf
AT peraltabaezismael comparativesurveystudyoftheuseofalowcostexoscopevsmicroscopeforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdf
AT nurmukhametovrenat comparativesurveystudyoftheuseofalowcostexoscopevsmicroscopeforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdf
AT goncharovefgeni comparativesurveystudyoftheuseofalowcostexoscopevsmicroscopeforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdf
AT efeibrahime comparativesurveystudyoftheuseofalowcostexoscopevsmicroscopeforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdf
AT sufianovalbert comparativesurveystudyoftheuseofalowcostexoscopevsmicroscopeforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdf
AT ramirezpenaissael comparativesurveystudyoftheuseofalowcostexoscopevsmicroscopeforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionacdf