Cargando…

Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of using a passive back-support exoskeleton (Laevo V2.56) on muscle activity, posture, heart rate, performance, usability, and wearer comfort during a course of three industrial tasks (COU; exoskeleton worn, turned-on), stair climbing test (SCT; exoskeleton worn,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luger, Tessy, Bär, Mona, Seibt, Robert, Rieger, Monika A., Steinhilber, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33861139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00187208211007267
_version_ 1784871167923847168
author Luger, Tessy
Bär, Mona
Seibt, Robert
Rieger, Monika A.
Steinhilber, Benjamin
author_facet Luger, Tessy
Bär, Mona
Seibt, Robert
Rieger, Monika A.
Steinhilber, Benjamin
author_sort Luger, Tessy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of using a passive back-support exoskeleton (Laevo V2.56) on muscle activity, posture, heart rate, performance, usability, and wearer comfort during a course of three industrial tasks (COU; exoskeleton worn, turned-on), stair climbing test (SCT; exoskeleton worn, turned-off), timed-up-and-go test (TUG; exoskeleton worn, turned-off) compared to no exoskeleton. BACKGROUND: Back-support exoskeletons have the potential to reduce work-related physical demands. METHODS: Thirty-six men participated. Activity of erector spinae (ES), biceps femoris (BF), rectus abdominis (RA), vastus lateralis (VL), gastrocnemius medialis (GM), trapezius descendens (TD) was recorded by electromyography; posture by trunk, hip, knee flexion angles; heart rate by electrocardiography; performance by time-to-task accomplishment (s) and perceived task difficulty (100-mm visual analogue scale; VAS); usability by the System Usability Scale (SUS) and all items belonging to domains skepticism and user-friendliness of the Technology Usage Inventory; wearer comfort by the 100-mm VAS. RESULTS: During parts of COU, using the exoskeleton decreased ES and BF activity and trunk flexion, and increased RA, GM, and TD activity, knee and hip flexion. Wearing the exoskeleton increased time-to-task accomplishment of SCT, TUG, and COU and perceived difficulty of SCT and TUG. Average SUS was 75.4, skepticism 11.5/28.0, user-friendliness 18.0/21.0, wearer comfort 31.1 mm. CONCLUSION: Using the exoskeleton modified muscle activity and posture depending on the task applied, slightly impaired performance, and was evaluated mildly uncomfortable. APPLICATION: These outcomes require investigating the effects of this passive back-supporting exoskeleton in longitudinal studies with longer operating times, providing better insights for guiding their application in real work settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9846378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98463782023-01-19 Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial Luger, Tessy Bär, Mona Seibt, Robert Rieger, Monika A. Steinhilber, Benjamin Hum Factors Biomechanics, Anthropometry, Work Physiology OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of using a passive back-support exoskeleton (Laevo V2.56) on muscle activity, posture, heart rate, performance, usability, and wearer comfort during a course of three industrial tasks (COU; exoskeleton worn, turned-on), stair climbing test (SCT; exoskeleton worn, turned-off), timed-up-and-go test (TUG; exoskeleton worn, turned-off) compared to no exoskeleton. BACKGROUND: Back-support exoskeletons have the potential to reduce work-related physical demands. METHODS: Thirty-six men participated. Activity of erector spinae (ES), biceps femoris (BF), rectus abdominis (RA), vastus lateralis (VL), gastrocnemius medialis (GM), trapezius descendens (TD) was recorded by electromyography; posture by trunk, hip, knee flexion angles; heart rate by electrocardiography; performance by time-to-task accomplishment (s) and perceived task difficulty (100-mm visual analogue scale; VAS); usability by the System Usability Scale (SUS) and all items belonging to domains skepticism and user-friendliness of the Technology Usage Inventory; wearer comfort by the 100-mm VAS. RESULTS: During parts of COU, using the exoskeleton decreased ES and BF activity and trunk flexion, and increased RA, GM, and TD activity, knee and hip flexion. Wearing the exoskeleton increased time-to-task accomplishment of SCT, TUG, and COU and perceived difficulty of SCT and TUG. Average SUS was 75.4, skepticism 11.5/28.0, user-friendliness 18.0/21.0, wearer comfort 31.1 mm. CONCLUSION: Using the exoskeleton modified muscle activity and posture depending on the task applied, slightly impaired performance, and was evaluated mildly uncomfortable. APPLICATION: These outcomes require investigating the effects of this passive back-supporting exoskeleton in longitudinal studies with longer operating times, providing better insights for guiding their application in real work settings. SAGE Publications 2021-04-16 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9846378/ /pubmed/33861139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00187208211007267 Text en Copyright © 2021, The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Biomechanics, Anthropometry, Work Physiology
Luger, Tessy
Bär, Mona
Seibt, Robert
Rieger, Monika A.
Steinhilber, Benjamin
Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial
title Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial
title_full Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial
title_fullStr Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial
title_full_unstemmed Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial
title_short Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks—Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial
title_sort using a back exoskeleton during industrial and functional tasks—effects on muscle activity, posture, performance, usability, and wearer discomfort in a laboratory trial
topic Biomechanics, Anthropometry, Work Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33861139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00187208211007267
work_keys_str_mv AT lugertessy usingabackexoskeletonduringindustrialandfunctionaltaskseffectsonmuscleactivitypostureperformanceusabilityandwearerdiscomfortinalaboratorytrial
AT barmona usingabackexoskeletonduringindustrialandfunctionaltaskseffectsonmuscleactivitypostureperformanceusabilityandwearerdiscomfortinalaboratorytrial
AT seibtrobert usingabackexoskeletonduringindustrialandfunctionaltaskseffectsonmuscleactivitypostureperformanceusabilityandwearerdiscomfortinalaboratorytrial
AT riegermonikaa usingabackexoskeletonduringindustrialandfunctionaltaskseffectsonmuscleactivitypostureperformanceusabilityandwearerdiscomfortinalaboratorytrial
AT steinhilberbenjamin usingabackexoskeletonduringindustrialandfunctionaltaskseffectsonmuscleactivitypostureperformanceusabilityandwearerdiscomfortinalaboratorytrial