Cargando…

The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD

Objectives: Medication non-adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is common. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of two interventions to improve the inhalation technique (IT) in patients with pulmonary disease is common. Also determine optimal IT reminder time and to test t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnestein-Fonseca, P., Cotta-Luque, VM., Aguiar-Leiva, VP., Leiva-Fernández, J., Martos-Crespo, Francisco, Leiva-Fernández, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.989362
_version_ 1784871215771418624
author Barnestein-Fonseca, P.
Cotta-Luque, VM.
Aguiar-Leiva, VP.
Leiva-Fernández, J.
Martos-Crespo, Francisco
Leiva-Fernández, F.
author_facet Barnestein-Fonseca, P.
Cotta-Luque, VM.
Aguiar-Leiva, VP.
Leiva-Fernández, J.
Martos-Crespo, Francisco
Leiva-Fernández, F.
author_sort Barnestein-Fonseca, P.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Medication non-adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is common. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of two interventions to improve the inhalation technique (IT) in patients with pulmonary disease is common. Also determine optimal IT reminder time and to test the role of preferences in the intervention selection. Method: 726 pulmonary disease in common patients (consecutive sampling) from two trials: 1) TECEPOC-study (patients’ preference trial/comprehensive cohort design) 2) TIEPOC-study (randomised controlled trial). Interventions: intervention-A (ad-hoc leaflet with instructions about correct IT according Spanish Respiratory Society), intervention B (intervention A+ individual training by instructors). Four visits were performed (baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months). Data on IT, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, quality of life and respiratory drugs were recorded. Analysis under intention to treat principle. Multivariate analysis was conducted to measure the potential modifying factors of improvement in the IT along follow-up. Results: 660 patients (90.9%) did not perform a correct IT at baseline 89.75% with Handihaler, 86.95% with Turbuhaler, 84.75% with Accuhaler and 87.35% with pMDI. At 12 months, 221 patients 29.9% performed correctly the IT; a decrease in the slope of the curve (correct IT) was detected at 3 months follow-up. Intervention B was the most effective in both trials compared to control group or intervention A, regardless of preferences: 1) TECEPOC Study (preference trial): Intervention B versus control group, NNT = 3.22 (IC95%, 2.27–5.52); and versus Intervention A, NNT = 3.57 (CI95%, 2.41–6.8). Preferences improved 6.7% in the correct IT without statistical significance. 2) TIEPOC Study (randomized controlled trial): Intervention B versus control group, NNT = 1.74 (IC95%, 1.47–2.17), and versus intervention A, NNT = 3.33 (CI 95%, 2.43–5.55). No differences were measured between Intervention A and control group. Conclusion: Individual training significantly improves IT. Reminders every 3 months are recommended. Preferences do not influence the intervention effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9846566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98465662023-01-19 The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD Barnestein-Fonseca, P. Cotta-Luque, VM. Aguiar-Leiva, VP. Leiva-Fernández, J. Martos-Crespo, Francisco Leiva-Fernández, F. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objectives: Medication non-adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is common. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of two interventions to improve the inhalation technique (IT) in patients with pulmonary disease is common. Also determine optimal IT reminder time and to test the role of preferences in the intervention selection. Method: 726 pulmonary disease in common patients (consecutive sampling) from two trials: 1) TECEPOC-study (patients’ preference trial/comprehensive cohort design) 2) TIEPOC-study (randomised controlled trial). Interventions: intervention-A (ad-hoc leaflet with instructions about correct IT according Spanish Respiratory Society), intervention B (intervention A+ individual training by instructors). Four visits were performed (baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months). Data on IT, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, quality of life and respiratory drugs were recorded. Analysis under intention to treat principle. Multivariate analysis was conducted to measure the potential modifying factors of improvement in the IT along follow-up. Results: 660 patients (90.9%) did not perform a correct IT at baseline 89.75% with Handihaler, 86.95% with Turbuhaler, 84.75% with Accuhaler and 87.35% with pMDI. At 12 months, 221 patients 29.9% performed correctly the IT; a decrease in the slope of the curve (correct IT) was detected at 3 months follow-up. Intervention B was the most effective in both trials compared to control group or intervention A, regardless of preferences: 1) TECEPOC Study (preference trial): Intervention B versus control group, NNT = 3.22 (IC95%, 2.27–5.52); and versus Intervention A, NNT = 3.57 (CI95%, 2.41–6.8). Preferences improved 6.7% in the correct IT without statistical significance. 2) TIEPOC Study (randomized controlled trial): Intervention B versus control group, NNT = 1.74 (IC95%, 1.47–2.17), and versus intervention A, NNT = 3.33 (CI 95%, 2.43–5.55). No differences were measured between Intervention A and control group. Conclusion: Individual training significantly improves IT. Reminders every 3 months are recommended. Preferences do not influence the intervention effectiveness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846566/ /pubmed/36686678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.989362 Text en Copyright © 2023 Barnestein-Fonseca, Cotta-Luque, Aguiar-Leiva, Leiva-Fernández, Martos-Crespo and Leiva-Fernández. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Barnestein-Fonseca, P.
Cotta-Luque, VM.
Aguiar-Leiva, VP.
Leiva-Fernández, J.
Martos-Crespo, Francisco
Leiva-Fernández, F.
The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD
title The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD
title_full The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD
title_fullStr The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD
title_full_unstemmed The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD
title_short The importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with COPD
title_sort importance of reminders and patient preferences to improve inhaler technique in older adults with copd
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.989362
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesteinfonsecap theimportanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT cottaluquevm theimportanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT aguiarleivavp theimportanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT leivafernandezj theimportanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT martoscrespofrancisco theimportanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT leivafernandezf theimportanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT barnesteinfonsecap importanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT cottaluquevm importanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT aguiarleivavp importanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT leivafernandezj importanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT martoscrespofrancisco importanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd
AT leivafernandezf importanceofremindersandpatientpreferencestoimproveinhalertechniqueinolderadultswithcopd