Cargando…
Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test
The idea of sources other than the test-takers’ knowledge leading to different results on high-stakes tests was the motif based on which the present investigation was initiated on the probable sources of unreliability of a test. For this purpose, the researchers went through a thorough literature re...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846653/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00215-7 |
_version_ | 1784871239861403648 |
---|---|
author | Nikmard, Fateme Tavassoli, Kobra Pourdana, Natasha |
author_facet | Nikmard, Fateme Tavassoli, Kobra Pourdana, Natasha |
author_sort | Nikmard, Fateme |
collection | PubMed |
description | The idea of sources other than the test-takers’ knowledge leading to different results on high-stakes tests was the motif based on which the present investigation was initiated on the probable sources of unreliability of a test. For this purpose, the researchers went through a thorough literature review with the aim to identify the issues to be counted as sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test, i.e., the MA University Entrance Exam of English (UEEE) in Iran. First, 17 MA UEEE test-takers were asked to take part in a semi-structured interview to find out their ideas about such sources. The outcome of the thematic coding of the information from the literature and interviews was a 57-item Likert scale questionnaire which was reviewed by three assessment experts, revised accordingly, piloted with 57 MA UEEE test-takers, and revised again with 55 items remaining. The revised questionnaire was administered to 312 MA UEEE test-takers in Iran, and its reliability and construct validity were checked through Cronbach alpha (.89) and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. After checking its reliability and construct validity, 46 items remained and loaded on four factors which were named as the effect of test-takers (16 items), structure of the test and external concerns (13 items), administration conditions of the test (13 items), and role of proctors (4 items). The results of this study might familiarize test developers, test administrators, teachers, and test-takers with issues they should be aware of in developing or preparing for a high-stakes test like the MA UEEE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9846653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98466532023-01-18 Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test Nikmard, Fateme Tavassoli, Kobra Pourdana, Natasha Lang Test Asia Research The idea of sources other than the test-takers’ knowledge leading to different results on high-stakes tests was the motif based on which the present investigation was initiated on the probable sources of unreliability of a test. For this purpose, the researchers went through a thorough literature review with the aim to identify the issues to be counted as sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test, i.e., the MA University Entrance Exam of English (UEEE) in Iran. First, 17 MA UEEE test-takers were asked to take part in a semi-structured interview to find out their ideas about such sources. The outcome of the thematic coding of the information from the literature and interviews was a 57-item Likert scale questionnaire which was reviewed by three assessment experts, revised accordingly, piloted with 57 MA UEEE test-takers, and revised again with 55 items remaining. The revised questionnaire was administered to 312 MA UEEE test-takers in Iran, and its reliability and construct validity were checked through Cronbach alpha (.89) and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. After checking its reliability and construct validity, 46 items remained and loaded on four factors which were named as the effect of test-takers (16 items), structure of the test and external concerns (13 items), administration conditions of the test (13 items), and role of proctors (4 items). The results of this study might familiarize test developers, test administrators, teachers, and test-takers with issues they should be aware of in developing or preparing for a high-stakes test like the MA UEEE. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9846653/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00215-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Nikmard, Fateme Tavassoli, Kobra Pourdana, Natasha Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test |
title | Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test |
title_full | Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test |
title_fullStr | Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test |
title_full_unstemmed | Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test |
title_short | Designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test |
title_sort | designing and validating a scale for evaluating the sources of unreliability of a high-stakes test |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846653/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00215-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nikmardfateme designingandvalidatingascaleforevaluatingthesourcesofunreliabilityofahighstakestest AT tavassolikobra designingandvalidatingascaleforevaluatingthesourcesofunreliabilityofahighstakestest AT pourdananatasha designingandvalidatingascaleforevaluatingthesourcesofunreliabilityofahighstakestest |