Cargando…
The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our experience with 1.5-T high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) for different neuro-oncological procedures in a pediatric population, and we discuss the safety, utility, and challenges of this intraoperative imaging technology. METHODS: A p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021335 |
_version_ | 1784871257156616192 |
---|---|
author | Becerra, Victoria Hinojosa, José Candela, Santiago Culebras, Diego Alamar, Mariana Armero, Georgina Echaniz, Gastón Artés, David Munuera, Josep Muchart, Jordi |
author_facet | Becerra, Victoria Hinojosa, José Candela, Santiago Culebras, Diego Alamar, Mariana Armero, Georgina Echaniz, Gastón Artés, David Munuera, Josep Muchart, Jordi |
author_sort | Becerra, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our experience with 1.5-T high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) for different neuro-oncological procedures in a pediatric population, and we discuss the safety, utility, and challenges of this intraoperative imaging technology. METHODS: A pediatric consecutive-case series of neuro-oncological surgeries performed between February 2020 and May 2022 was analyzed from a prospective ioMRI registry. Patients were divided into four groups according to the surgical procedure: intracranial tumors (group 1), intraspinal tumors (group 2), stereotactic biopsy for unresectable tumors (group 3), and catheter placement for cystic tumors (group 4). The goal of surgery, the volume of residual tumor, preoperative and discharge neurological status, and postoperative complications related to ioMRI were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 146 procedures with ioMRI were performed during this period. Of these, 62 were oncology surgeries: 45 in group 1, two in group 2, 10 in group 3, and five in group 4. The mean age of our patients was 8.91 years, with the youngest being 12 months. ioMRI identified residual tumors and prompted further resection in 14% of the cases. The mean time for intraoperative image processing was 54 ± 6 min. There were no intra- or postoperative security incidents related to the use of ioMRI. The reoperation rate in the early postoperative period was 0%. CONCLUSION: ioMRI in pediatric neuro-oncology surgery is a safe and reliable tool. Its routine use maximized the extent of tumor resection and did not result in increased neurological deficits or complications in our series. The main limitations included the need for strict safety protocols in a highly complex surgical environment as well as the inherent limitations on certain patient positions with available MR-compatible headrests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9846736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98467362023-01-19 The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges Becerra, Victoria Hinojosa, José Candela, Santiago Culebras, Diego Alamar, Mariana Armero, Georgina Echaniz, Gastón Artés, David Munuera, Josep Muchart, Jordi Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our experience with 1.5-T high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) for different neuro-oncological procedures in a pediatric population, and we discuss the safety, utility, and challenges of this intraoperative imaging technology. METHODS: A pediatric consecutive-case series of neuro-oncological surgeries performed between February 2020 and May 2022 was analyzed from a prospective ioMRI registry. Patients were divided into four groups according to the surgical procedure: intracranial tumors (group 1), intraspinal tumors (group 2), stereotactic biopsy for unresectable tumors (group 3), and catheter placement for cystic tumors (group 4). The goal of surgery, the volume of residual tumor, preoperative and discharge neurological status, and postoperative complications related to ioMRI were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 146 procedures with ioMRI were performed during this period. Of these, 62 were oncology surgeries: 45 in group 1, two in group 2, 10 in group 3, and five in group 4. The mean age of our patients was 8.91 years, with the youngest being 12 months. ioMRI identified residual tumors and prompted further resection in 14% of the cases. The mean time for intraoperative image processing was 54 ± 6 min. There were no intra- or postoperative security incidents related to the use of ioMRI. The reoperation rate in the early postoperative period was 0%. CONCLUSION: ioMRI in pediatric neuro-oncology surgery is a safe and reliable tool. Its routine use maximized the extent of tumor resection and did not result in increased neurological deficits or complications in our series. The main limitations included the need for strict safety protocols in a highly complex surgical environment as well as the inherent limitations on certain patient positions with available MR-compatible headrests. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846736/ /pubmed/36686826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021335 Text en Copyright © 2023 Becerra, Hinojosa, Candela, Culebras, Alamar, Armero, Echaniz, Artés, Munuera and Muchart https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Becerra, Victoria Hinojosa, José Candela, Santiago Culebras, Diego Alamar, Mariana Armero, Georgina Echaniz, Gastón Artés, David Munuera, Josep Muchart, Jordi The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges |
title | The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges |
title_full | The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges |
title_fullStr | The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges |
title_short | The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges |
title_sort | impact of 1.5-t intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: safety, utility, and challenges |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT becerravictoria theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT hinojosajose theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT candelasantiago theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT culebrasdiego theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT alamarmariana theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT armerogeorgina theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT echanizgaston theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT artesdavid theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT munuerajosep theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT muchartjordi theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT becerravictoria impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT hinojosajose impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT candelasantiago impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT culebrasdiego impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT alamarmariana impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT armerogeorgina impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT echanizgaston impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT artesdavid impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT munuerajosep impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges AT muchartjordi impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges |