Cargando…

The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our experience with 1.5-T high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) for different neuro-oncological procedures in a pediatric population, and we discuss the safety, utility, and challenges of this intraoperative imaging technology. METHODS: A p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becerra, Victoria, Hinojosa, José, Candela, Santiago, Culebras, Diego, Alamar, Mariana, Armero, Georgina, Echaniz, Gastón, Artés, David, Munuera, Josep, Muchart, Jordi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021335
_version_ 1784871257156616192
author Becerra, Victoria
Hinojosa, José
Candela, Santiago
Culebras, Diego
Alamar, Mariana
Armero, Georgina
Echaniz, Gastón
Artés, David
Munuera, Josep
Muchart, Jordi
author_facet Becerra, Victoria
Hinojosa, José
Candela, Santiago
Culebras, Diego
Alamar, Mariana
Armero, Georgina
Echaniz, Gastón
Artés, David
Munuera, Josep
Muchart, Jordi
author_sort Becerra, Victoria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our experience with 1.5-T high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) for different neuro-oncological procedures in a pediatric population, and we discuss the safety, utility, and challenges of this intraoperative imaging technology. METHODS: A pediatric consecutive-case series of neuro-oncological surgeries performed between February 2020 and May 2022 was analyzed from a prospective ioMRI registry. Patients were divided into four groups according to the surgical procedure: intracranial tumors (group 1), intraspinal tumors (group 2), stereotactic biopsy for unresectable tumors (group 3), and catheter placement for cystic tumors (group 4). The goal of surgery, the volume of residual tumor, preoperative and discharge neurological status, and postoperative complications related to ioMRI were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 146 procedures with ioMRI were performed during this period. Of these, 62 were oncology surgeries: 45 in group 1, two in group 2, 10 in group 3, and five in group 4. The mean age of our patients was 8.91 years, with the youngest being 12 months. ioMRI identified residual tumors and prompted further resection in 14% of the cases. The mean time for intraoperative image processing was 54 ± 6 min. There were no intra- or postoperative security incidents related to the use of ioMRI. The reoperation rate in the early postoperative period was 0%. CONCLUSION: ioMRI in pediatric neuro-oncology surgery is a safe and reliable tool. Its routine use maximized the extent of tumor resection and did not result in increased neurological deficits or complications in our series. The main limitations included the need for strict safety protocols in a highly complex surgical environment as well as the inherent limitations on certain patient positions with available MR-compatible headrests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9846736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98467362023-01-19 The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges Becerra, Victoria Hinojosa, José Candela, Santiago Culebras, Diego Alamar, Mariana Armero, Georgina Echaniz, Gastón Artés, David Munuera, Josep Muchart, Jordi Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our experience with 1.5-T high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) for different neuro-oncological procedures in a pediatric population, and we discuss the safety, utility, and challenges of this intraoperative imaging technology. METHODS: A pediatric consecutive-case series of neuro-oncological surgeries performed between February 2020 and May 2022 was analyzed from a prospective ioMRI registry. Patients were divided into four groups according to the surgical procedure: intracranial tumors (group 1), intraspinal tumors (group 2), stereotactic biopsy for unresectable tumors (group 3), and catheter placement for cystic tumors (group 4). The goal of surgery, the volume of residual tumor, preoperative and discharge neurological status, and postoperative complications related to ioMRI were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 146 procedures with ioMRI were performed during this period. Of these, 62 were oncology surgeries: 45 in group 1, two in group 2, 10 in group 3, and five in group 4. The mean age of our patients was 8.91 years, with the youngest being 12 months. ioMRI identified residual tumors and prompted further resection in 14% of the cases. The mean time for intraoperative image processing was 54 ± 6 min. There were no intra- or postoperative security incidents related to the use of ioMRI. The reoperation rate in the early postoperative period was 0%. CONCLUSION: ioMRI in pediatric neuro-oncology surgery is a safe and reliable tool. Its routine use maximized the extent of tumor resection and did not result in increased neurological deficits or complications in our series. The main limitations included the need for strict safety protocols in a highly complex surgical environment as well as the inherent limitations on certain patient positions with available MR-compatible headrests. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846736/ /pubmed/36686826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021335 Text en Copyright © 2023 Becerra, Hinojosa, Candela, Culebras, Alamar, Armero, Echaniz, Artés, Munuera and Muchart https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Becerra, Victoria
Hinojosa, José
Candela, Santiago
Culebras, Diego
Alamar, Mariana
Armero, Georgina
Echaniz, Gastón
Artés, David
Munuera, Josep
Muchart, Jordi
The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges
title The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges
title_full The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges
title_fullStr The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges
title_full_unstemmed The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges
title_short The impact of 1.5-T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: Safety, utility, and challenges
title_sort impact of 1.5-t intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric tumor surgery: safety, utility, and challenges
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1021335
work_keys_str_mv AT becerravictoria theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT hinojosajose theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT candelasantiago theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT culebrasdiego theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT alamarmariana theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT armerogeorgina theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT echanizgaston theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT artesdavid theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT munuerajosep theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT muchartjordi theimpactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT becerravictoria impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT hinojosajose impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT candelasantiago impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT culebrasdiego impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT alamarmariana impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT armerogeorgina impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT echanizgaston impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT artesdavid impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT munuerajosep impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges
AT muchartjordi impactof15tintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginpediatrictumorsurgerysafetyutilityandchallenges