Cargando…

Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains

Introduction: If the aim is to increase maximal strength (MSt) and muscle mass, resistance training (RT) is primarily used to achieve these outcomes. However, research indicates that long-duration stretching sessions of up to 2 h per day can also provide sufficient stimuli to induce muscle growth. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warneke, Konstantin, Zech, Astrid, Wagner, Carl-Maximilian, Konrad, Andreas, Nakamura, Masatoshi, Keiner, Michael, Schoenfeld, Brad J., Behm, David George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1078301
_version_ 1784871269215240192
author Warneke, Konstantin
Zech, Astrid
Wagner, Carl-Maximilian
Konrad, Andreas
Nakamura, Masatoshi
Keiner, Michael
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Behm, David George
author_facet Warneke, Konstantin
Zech, Astrid
Wagner, Carl-Maximilian
Konrad, Andreas
Nakamura, Masatoshi
Keiner, Michael
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Behm, David George
author_sort Warneke, Konstantin
collection PubMed
description Introduction: If the aim is to increase maximal strength (MSt) and muscle mass, resistance training (RT) is primarily used to achieve these outcomes. However, research indicates that long-duration stretching sessions of up to 2 h per day can also provide sufficient stimuli to induce muscle growth. In RT literature, sex-related differences in adaptations are widely discussed, however, there is a lack of evidence addressing the sex-related effects on MSt and muscle thickness (MTh) of longer duration stretch training. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of 6 weeks of daily (1 h) unilateral static stretch training of the plantar flexors using a calf-muscle stretching device. Methods: Fifty-five healthy (m = 28, f = 27), active participants joined the study. MSt and range of motion (ROM) were measured with extended and flexed knee joint, and MTh was investigated in the medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius. Results: Statistically significant increases in MSt of 6%–15% (p < .001–.049, d = 0.45–1.09), ROM of 6%–21% (p < .001–.037, d = 0.47–1.38) and MTh of 4%–14% (p < .001–.005, d = 0.46–0.72) from pre-to post-test were observed, considering both sexes and both legs. Furthermore, there was a significant higher increase in MSt, MTh and ROM in male participants. In both groups, participants showed more pronounced adaptations in MSt and ROM with an extended knee joint as well as MTh in the medial head of the gastrocnemius (p < .001–.047). Results for relative MSt increases showed a similar result (p < .001–.036, d = 0.48–1.03). Discussion: Results are in accordance with previous studies pointing out significant increases of MSt, MTh and ROM due to long duration static stretch training. Both sexes showed significant increases in listed parameters however, male participants showed superior increases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9846774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98467742023-01-19 Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains Warneke, Konstantin Zech, Astrid Wagner, Carl-Maximilian Konrad, Andreas Nakamura, Masatoshi Keiner, Michael Schoenfeld, Brad J. Behm, David George Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: If the aim is to increase maximal strength (MSt) and muscle mass, resistance training (RT) is primarily used to achieve these outcomes. However, research indicates that long-duration stretching sessions of up to 2 h per day can also provide sufficient stimuli to induce muscle growth. In RT literature, sex-related differences in adaptations are widely discussed, however, there is a lack of evidence addressing the sex-related effects on MSt and muscle thickness (MTh) of longer duration stretch training. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of 6 weeks of daily (1 h) unilateral static stretch training of the plantar flexors using a calf-muscle stretching device. Methods: Fifty-five healthy (m = 28, f = 27), active participants joined the study. MSt and range of motion (ROM) were measured with extended and flexed knee joint, and MTh was investigated in the medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius. Results: Statistically significant increases in MSt of 6%–15% (p < .001–.049, d = 0.45–1.09), ROM of 6%–21% (p < .001–.037, d = 0.47–1.38) and MTh of 4%–14% (p < .001–.005, d = 0.46–0.72) from pre-to post-test were observed, considering both sexes and both legs. Furthermore, there was a significant higher increase in MSt, MTh and ROM in male participants. In both groups, participants showed more pronounced adaptations in MSt and ROM with an extended knee joint as well as MTh in the medial head of the gastrocnemius (p < .001–.047). Results for relative MSt increases showed a similar result (p < .001–.036, d = 0.48–1.03). Discussion: Results are in accordance with previous studies pointing out significant increases of MSt, MTh and ROM due to long duration static stretch training. Both sexes showed significant increases in listed parameters however, male participants showed superior increases. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846774/ /pubmed/36685189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1078301 Text en Copyright © 2023 Warneke, Zech, Wagner, Konrad, Nakamura, Keiner, Schoenfeld and Behm. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Warneke, Konstantin
Zech, Astrid
Wagner, Carl-Maximilian
Konrad, Andreas
Nakamura, Masatoshi
Keiner, Michael
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Behm, David George
Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
title Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
title_full Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
title_fullStr Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
title_short Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
title_sort sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1078301
work_keys_str_mv AT warnekekonstantin sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains
AT zechastrid sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains
AT wagnercarlmaximilian sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains
AT konradandreas sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains
AT nakamuramasatoshi sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains
AT keinermichael sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains
AT schoenfeldbradj sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains
AT behmdavidgeorge sexdifferencesinstretchinducedhypertrophymaximalstrengthandflexibilitygains