Cargando…

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) and non-ETP ALL patients and the outcomes of these patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHOD: A total of 57 patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Juan, Liu, Li, Ma, Runzhi, Pang, Aiming, Yang, Donglin, Chen, Xin, Wei, Jialin, He, Yi, Zhang, Rongli, Zhai, Weihua, Ma, Qiaoling, Jiang, Erlie, Han, Mingzhe, Feng, Sizhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686839
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1025885
_version_ 1784871271493795840
author Chen, Juan
Liu, Li
Ma, Runzhi
Pang, Aiming
Yang, Donglin
Chen, Xin
Wei, Jialin
He, Yi
Zhang, Rongli
Zhai, Weihua
Ma, Qiaoling
Jiang, Erlie
Han, Mingzhe
Feng, Sizhou
author_facet Chen, Juan
Liu, Li
Ma, Runzhi
Pang, Aiming
Yang, Donglin
Chen, Xin
Wei, Jialin
He, Yi
Zhang, Rongli
Zhai, Weihua
Ma, Qiaoling
Jiang, Erlie
Han, Mingzhe
Feng, Sizhou
author_sort Chen, Juan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) and non-ETP ALL patients and the outcomes of these patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHOD: A total of 57 patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma receiving allo-HSCT at our center between January 2016 and March 2022 were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed as ETP-ALL/LBL (28/57, 49.12%) in the cohort. RESULTS: The baseline characteristic was not significantly different between the two groups. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 14 days (ranged from 11 to 21) versus 14 days (ranged from 10 to 20) (P = 0.067) and 18 days (ranged from 12 to 27) versus 15.5 days (ranged from 12 to 72) (P = 0.183) for platelet engraftment in the ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (54.74% ± 10.33% vs. 64.20% ± 10.30%, P = 0.786), relapse-free survival (56.22% ± 10.11% vs. 57.17% ± 12.71%, P = 0.841), cumulative incidence of relapse (30.14% ± 9.85% vs. 22.79% ± 8.24%, P = 0.774), and non-relapse mortality (19.52% ± 8.99% vs. 25.95% ± 14.44%, P = 0.967) between the two groups. The incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) (P = 0.922), II–IV aGVHD (P = 0.940), III–IV aGVHD (P = 0.664), cytomegalovirus infection (P = 0.862), Epstein–Barr virus infection (P = 0.610), and severe bacterial infection (P = 0.145) was also similar. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with ETP-ALL/LBL was similar to non-ETP ALL patients when they received allo-HSCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9846781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98467812023-01-19 Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Chen, Juan Liu, Li Ma, Runzhi Pang, Aiming Yang, Donglin Chen, Xin Wei, Jialin He, Yi Zhang, Rongli Zhai, Weihua Ma, Qiaoling Jiang, Erlie Han, Mingzhe Feng, Sizhou Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) and non-ETP ALL patients and the outcomes of these patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHOD: A total of 57 patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma receiving allo-HSCT at our center between January 2016 and March 2022 were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed as ETP-ALL/LBL (28/57, 49.12%) in the cohort. RESULTS: The baseline characteristic was not significantly different between the two groups. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 14 days (ranged from 11 to 21) versus 14 days (ranged from 10 to 20) (P = 0.067) and 18 days (ranged from 12 to 27) versus 15.5 days (ranged from 12 to 72) (P = 0.183) for platelet engraftment in the ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (54.74% ± 10.33% vs. 64.20% ± 10.30%, P = 0.786), relapse-free survival (56.22% ± 10.11% vs. 57.17% ± 12.71%, P = 0.841), cumulative incidence of relapse (30.14% ± 9.85% vs. 22.79% ± 8.24%, P = 0.774), and non-relapse mortality (19.52% ± 8.99% vs. 25.95% ± 14.44%, P = 0.967) between the two groups. The incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) (P = 0.922), II–IV aGVHD (P = 0.940), III–IV aGVHD (P = 0.664), cytomegalovirus infection (P = 0.862), Epstein–Barr virus infection (P = 0.610), and severe bacterial infection (P = 0.145) was also similar. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with ETP-ALL/LBL was similar to non-ETP ALL patients when they received allo-HSCT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846781/ /pubmed/36686839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1025885 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chen, Liu, Ma, Pang, Yang, Chen, Wei, He, Zhang, Zhai, Ma, Jiang, Han and Feng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chen, Juan
Liu, Li
Ma, Runzhi
Pang, Aiming
Yang, Donglin
Chen, Xin
Wei, Jialin
He, Yi
Zhang, Rongli
Zhai, Weihua
Ma, Qiaoling
Jiang, Erlie
Han, Mingzhe
Feng, Sizhou
Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_full Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_fullStr Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_short Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
title_sort comparison of characteristics and outcomes on etp-all/lbl and non-etp all patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686839
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1025885
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjuan comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT liuli comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT marunzhi comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT pangaiming comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT yangdonglin comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT chenxin comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT weijialin comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT heyi comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT zhangrongli comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT zhaiweihua comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT maqiaoling comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT jiangerlie comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT hanmingzhe comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT fengsizhou comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation