Cargando…
Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) and non-ETP ALL patients and the outcomes of these patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHOD: A total of 57 patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1025885 |
_version_ | 1784871271493795840 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Juan Liu, Li Ma, Runzhi Pang, Aiming Yang, Donglin Chen, Xin Wei, Jialin He, Yi Zhang, Rongli Zhai, Weihua Ma, Qiaoling Jiang, Erlie Han, Mingzhe Feng, Sizhou |
author_facet | Chen, Juan Liu, Li Ma, Runzhi Pang, Aiming Yang, Donglin Chen, Xin Wei, Jialin He, Yi Zhang, Rongli Zhai, Weihua Ma, Qiaoling Jiang, Erlie Han, Mingzhe Feng, Sizhou |
author_sort | Chen, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) and non-ETP ALL patients and the outcomes of these patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHOD: A total of 57 patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma receiving allo-HSCT at our center between January 2016 and March 2022 were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed as ETP-ALL/LBL (28/57, 49.12%) in the cohort. RESULTS: The baseline characteristic was not significantly different between the two groups. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 14 days (ranged from 11 to 21) versus 14 days (ranged from 10 to 20) (P = 0.067) and 18 days (ranged from 12 to 27) versus 15.5 days (ranged from 12 to 72) (P = 0.183) for platelet engraftment in the ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (54.74% ± 10.33% vs. 64.20% ± 10.30%, P = 0.786), relapse-free survival (56.22% ± 10.11% vs. 57.17% ± 12.71%, P = 0.841), cumulative incidence of relapse (30.14% ± 9.85% vs. 22.79% ± 8.24%, P = 0.774), and non-relapse mortality (19.52% ± 8.99% vs. 25.95% ± 14.44%, P = 0.967) between the two groups. The incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) (P = 0.922), II–IV aGVHD (P = 0.940), III–IV aGVHD (P = 0.664), cytomegalovirus infection (P = 0.862), Epstein–Barr virus infection (P = 0.610), and severe bacterial infection (P = 0.145) was also similar. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with ETP-ALL/LBL was similar to non-ETP ALL patients when they received allo-HSCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9846781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98467812023-01-19 Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Chen, Juan Liu, Li Ma, Runzhi Pang, Aiming Yang, Donglin Chen, Xin Wei, Jialin He, Yi Zhang, Rongli Zhai, Weihua Ma, Qiaoling Jiang, Erlie Han, Mingzhe Feng, Sizhou Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) and non-ETP ALL patients and the outcomes of these patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHOD: A total of 57 patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma receiving allo-HSCT at our center between January 2016 and March 2022 were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed as ETP-ALL/LBL (28/57, 49.12%) in the cohort. RESULTS: The baseline characteristic was not significantly different between the two groups. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 14 days (ranged from 11 to 21) versus 14 days (ranged from 10 to 20) (P = 0.067) and 18 days (ranged from 12 to 27) versus 15.5 days (ranged from 12 to 72) (P = 0.183) for platelet engraftment in the ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (54.74% ± 10.33% vs. 64.20% ± 10.30%, P = 0.786), relapse-free survival (56.22% ± 10.11% vs. 57.17% ± 12.71%, P = 0.841), cumulative incidence of relapse (30.14% ± 9.85% vs. 22.79% ± 8.24%, P = 0.774), and non-relapse mortality (19.52% ± 8.99% vs. 25.95% ± 14.44%, P = 0.967) between the two groups. The incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) (P = 0.922), II–IV aGVHD (P = 0.940), III–IV aGVHD (P = 0.664), cytomegalovirus infection (P = 0.862), Epstein–Barr virus infection (P = 0.610), and severe bacterial infection (P = 0.145) was also similar. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with ETP-ALL/LBL was similar to non-ETP ALL patients when they received allo-HSCT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9846781/ /pubmed/36686839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1025885 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chen, Liu, Ma, Pang, Yang, Chen, Wei, He, Zhang, Zhai, Ma, Jiang, Han and Feng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Chen, Juan Liu, Li Ma, Runzhi Pang, Aiming Yang, Donglin Chen, Xin Wei, Jialin He, Yi Zhang, Rongli Zhai, Weihua Ma, Qiaoling Jiang, Erlie Han, Mingzhe Feng, Sizhou Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title | Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_full | Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_short | Comparison of characteristics and outcomes on ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_sort | comparison of characteristics and outcomes on etp-all/lbl and non-etp all patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1025885 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjuan comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT liuli comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT marunzhi comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT pangaiming comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT yangdonglin comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT chenxin comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT weijialin comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT heyi comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT zhangrongli comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT zhaiweihua comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT maqiaoling comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT jiangerlie comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT hanmingzhe comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT fengsizhou comparisonofcharacteristicsandoutcomesonetpalllblandnonetpallpatientsreceivingallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation |