Cargando…
How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study
RATIONALE: Although urban-rural residency has been shown to influence individual COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, the differences between urban and rural China have yet to be uncovered. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the current prevalence and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36736053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115695 |
_version_ | 1784871299291545600 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Jian Shen, Zhanlei Li, Quanman Tarimo, Clifford Silver Wang, Meiyun Gu, Jianqin Wei, Wei Zhang, Xinyu Huang, Yanli Ma, Mingze Xu, Dongyang Ojangba, Theodora Miao, Yudong |
author_facet | Wu, Jian Shen, Zhanlei Li, Quanman Tarimo, Clifford Silver Wang, Meiyun Gu, Jianqin Wei, Wei Zhang, Xinyu Huang, Yanli Ma, Mingze Xu, Dongyang Ojangba, Theodora Miao, Yudong |
author_sort | Wu, Jian |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: Although urban-rural residency has been shown to influence individual COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, the differences between urban and rural China have yet to be uncovered. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the current prevalence and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in urban and rural areas and explore whether the rural versus urban residency is associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: A national, cross-sectional, online survey among Chinese urban and rural adults (≥18 years old) was conducted from 6th to August 9, 2021. A questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic factors, perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination status. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to explore the association between urban versus rural residency and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: In total, 29,925 participants (80.56% urban participants) were recruited. Urban participants had a higher COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than their rural counterparts (9.39% vs. 4.26%). After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among females was lower than that in males in both urban (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.69–0.88]) and rural areas (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.39–0.75]). The lack of trust towards vaccine producers was found to be associated with vaccine hesitancy among the urban participants (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI [2.22–3.43]). The rural floating population had a lower COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than the rural permanent residents (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.42–0.80]). PSM analysis revealed a 2.38% difference in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy between urban and rural participants. CONCLUSIONS: Urban participants were more hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than rural participants. Priority should be placed on boosting confidence in the healthcare system to reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among urban residents. Furthermore, we advocate for extra incentives and vaccination education for rural permanent residents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9846885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98468852023-01-18 How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study Wu, Jian Shen, Zhanlei Li, Quanman Tarimo, Clifford Silver Wang, Meiyun Gu, Jianqin Wei, Wei Zhang, Xinyu Huang, Yanli Ma, Mingze Xu, Dongyang Ojangba, Theodora Miao, Yudong Soc Sci Med Article RATIONALE: Although urban-rural residency has been shown to influence individual COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, the differences between urban and rural China have yet to be uncovered. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the current prevalence and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in urban and rural areas and explore whether the rural versus urban residency is associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: A national, cross-sectional, online survey among Chinese urban and rural adults (≥18 years old) was conducted from 6th to August 9, 2021. A questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic factors, perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination status. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to explore the association between urban versus rural residency and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: In total, 29,925 participants (80.56% urban participants) were recruited. Urban participants had a higher COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than their rural counterparts (9.39% vs. 4.26%). After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among females was lower than that in males in both urban (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.69–0.88]) and rural areas (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.39–0.75]). The lack of trust towards vaccine producers was found to be associated with vaccine hesitancy among the urban participants (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI [2.22–3.43]). The rural floating population had a lower COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than the rural permanent residents (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.42–0.80]). PSM analysis revealed a 2.38% difference in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy between urban and rural participants. CONCLUSIONS: Urban participants were more hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than rural participants. Priority should be placed on boosting confidence in the healthcare system to reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among urban residents. Furthermore, we advocate for extra incentives and vaccination education for rural permanent residents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-03 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9846885/ /pubmed/36736053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115695 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Wu, Jian Shen, Zhanlei Li, Quanman Tarimo, Clifford Silver Wang, Meiyun Gu, Jianqin Wei, Wei Zhang, Xinyu Huang, Yanli Ma, Mingze Xu, Dongyang Ojangba, Theodora Miao, Yudong How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study |
title | How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study |
title_full | How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study |
title_fullStr | How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study |
title_full_unstemmed | How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study |
title_short | How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study |
title_sort | how urban versus rural residency relates to covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: a large-scale national chinese study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36736053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wujian howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT shenzhanlei howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT liquanman howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT tarimocliffordsilver howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT wangmeiyun howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT gujianqin howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT weiwei howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT zhangxinyu howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT huangyanli howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT mamingze howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT xudongyang howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT ojangbatheodora howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy AT miaoyudong howurbanversusruralresidencyrelatestocovid19vaccinehesitancyalargescalenationalchinesestudy |