Cargando…
Study results from journals with a higher impact factor are closer to “truth”: a meta-epidemiological study
BACKGROUND: Scientists, physicians, and the general public legitimately expect scholarly publications to give true answers to study questions raised. We investigated whether findings from studies published in journals with higher Journal Impact Factors (JIFs) are closer to truth than findings from s...
Autores principales: | Heidenreich, Andreas, Eisemann, Nora, Katalinic, Alexander, Hübner, Joachim |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02167-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Contributing and limiting factors to guideline-adherent therapy in senior and elderly breast cancer patients: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study using clinical and cancer registry data in Germany
por: Heidenreich, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration
por: Eisemann, Nora, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The ProCaSP study: quality of life outcomes of prostate cancer patients after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy in a cohort study
por: Eisemann, Nora, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Physicians’ perspectives on family caregivers’ roles in elderly cancer patients’ therapies: a qualitative, interview-based study
por: Heidenreich, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Replicating finding, answering questions: closer to the truth about COVID-19 associated VAP
por: Vacheron, Charles-Hervé, et al.
Publicado: (2023)