Cargando…

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair has the advantages of less bleeding, less trauma, less pain, and fast recovery, there are several issues that need to be addressed. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preperitoneal closed‑suction drain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Guangbo, Shi, Danli, Chen, Min, Zhang, Chihao, Li, Hongjie, Luo, Meng, Fan, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01900-9
_version_ 1784871393836400640
author Wu, Guangbo
Shi, Danli
Chen, Min
Zhang, Chihao
Li, Hongjie
Luo, Meng
Fan, Qiang
author_facet Wu, Guangbo
Shi, Danli
Chen, Min
Zhang, Chihao
Li, Hongjie
Luo, Meng
Fan, Qiang
author_sort Wu, Guangbo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair has the advantages of less bleeding, less trauma, less pain, and fast recovery, there are several issues that need to be addressed. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preperitoneal closed‑suction drainage on reducing postoperative complications in TEP inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 122 patients who underwent TEP inguinal hernia repair between June 2018 and June 2021 was performed. The patients were divided into the drainage group and the non-drainage group according to whether the drainage tube was placed or not. Clinical data, surgical procedures and outcome of these patients were collected and analyzed to assess the effectiveness of drainage. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients undergoing TEP surgery were screened, of which 22 were excluded. Most of the patients were male with right indirect inguinal hernia. There was no difference in the mean length of hospital stay between the two groups. Postoperative pain was alleviated by preperitoneal closed‑suction drainage 24 h after operation (p = 0.03). The rate of complications such as scrotal edema, seroma and urinary retention in the drainage group was significantly lower than that in the non-drainage group (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that drainage was beneficial to reduce postoperative complications (OR, 0.015; 95% CI, 0.002–0.140; p < 0.01). In addition, it was worth noting that in subgroup analysis, patients with hernia sac volume > 10 cm(3) might receive more clinical benefits by placing drainage tube. CONCLUSION: In TEP inguinal hernia repair, placing drainage tube is a simple and feasible traditional surgical treatment, which can promote postoperative recovery without increasing the risk of infection, especially in patients with large hernia sac volume. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01900-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9847164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98471642023-01-19 Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications Wu, Guangbo Shi, Danli Chen, Min Zhang, Chihao Li, Hongjie Luo, Meng Fan, Qiang BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair has the advantages of less bleeding, less trauma, less pain, and fast recovery, there are several issues that need to be addressed. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preperitoneal closed‑suction drainage on reducing postoperative complications in TEP inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 122 patients who underwent TEP inguinal hernia repair between June 2018 and June 2021 was performed. The patients were divided into the drainage group and the non-drainage group according to whether the drainage tube was placed or not. Clinical data, surgical procedures and outcome of these patients were collected and analyzed to assess the effectiveness of drainage. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients undergoing TEP surgery were screened, of which 22 were excluded. Most of the patients were male with right indirect inguinal hernia. There was no difference in the mean length of hospital stay between the two groups. Postoperative pain was alleviated by preperitoneal closed‑suction drainage 24 h after operation (p = 0.03). The rate of complications such as scrotal edema, seroma and urinary retention in the drainage group was significantly lower than that in the non-drainage group (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that drainage was beneficial to reduce postoperative complications (OR, 0.015; 95% CI, 0.002–0.140; p < 0.01). In addition, it was worth noting that in subgroup analysis, patients with hernia sac volume > 10 cm(3) might receive more clinical benefits by placing drainage tube. CONCLUSION: In TEP inguinal hernia repair, placing drainage tube is a simple and feasible traditional surgical treatment, which can promote postoperative recovery without increasing the risk of infection, especially in patients with large hernia sac volume. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01900-9. BioMed Central 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9847164/ /pubmed/36650526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01900-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Guangbo
Shi, Danli
Chen, Min
Zhang, Chihao
Li, Hongjie
Luo, Meng
Fan, Qiang
Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications
title Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications
title_full Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications
title_fullStr Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications
title_short Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications
title_sort laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (tep) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01900-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wuguangbo laparoscopictotalextraperitonealtepinguinalherniarepairwithpreperitonealclosedsuctiondrainagereducedpostoperativecomplications
AT shidanli laparoscopictotalextraperitonealtepinguinalherniarepairwithpreperitonealclosedsuctiondrainagereducedpostoperativecomplications
AT chenmin laparoscopictotalextraperitonealtepinguinalherniarepairwithpreperitonealclosedsuctiondrainagereducedpostoperativecomplications
AT zhangchihao laparoscopictotalextraperitonealtepinguinalherniarepairwithpreperitonealclosedsuctiondrainagereducedpostoperativecomplications
AT lihongjie laparoscopictotalextraperitonealtepinguinalherniarepairwithpreperitonealclosedsuctiondrainagereducedpostoperativecomplications
AT luomeng laparoscopictotalextraperitonealtepinguinalherniarepairwithpreperitonealclosedsuctiondrainagereducedpostoperativecomplications
AT fanqiang laparoscopictotalextraperitonealtepinguinalherniarepairwithpreperitonealclosedsuctiondrainagereducedpostoperativecomplications