Cargando…

The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Type III pelvic bone tumor resections are often accompanied by postoperative complications. In order to reduce complications, we developed a novel pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique to reconstruct the pelvic ring defect. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and risks of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Xinhui, Wei, Hua, Zhang, Boya, Gao, Shilei, Li, Zhehuang, Yao, Weitao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02905-1
_version_ 1784871405283704832
author Du, Xinhui
Wei, Hua
Zhang, Boya
Gao, Shilei
Li, Zhehuang
Yao, Weitao
author_facet Du, Xinhui
Wei, Hua
Zhang, Boya
Gao, Shilei
Li, Zhehuang
Yao, Weitao
author_sort Du, Xinhui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Type III pelvic bone tumor resections are often accompanied by postoperative complications. In order to reduce complications, we developed a novel pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique to reconstruct the pelvic ring defect. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and risks of this PSM technique in type III pelvic bone tumor resections by comparing outcomes between patients that underwent PSM reconstruction and patients that did not receive any reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive set of patients that underwent type III pelvic bone tumor surgeries in our center from January 2020 to January 2021 with either PSM reconstruction (designated as the PSM group) or without any reconstruction (designated as the control group). General information such as age, gender, tumor type, tumor size, and surgical-related information such as duration of surgery, blood loss, and the surgical margins was collected. Outcome data recorded included wound complications such as infection and dehiscence, local recurrence, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores for postoperative functional evaluation. Statistical analysis between both groups was performed with GraphPad Prism v7. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in this study (PSM group n = 12, control group n = 8). While no herniation was found in the PSM group, it occurred in 6 of 8 cases in the control group. The control group showed a significantly higher rate of bacterial infection (p = 0.03) and wound dehiscence (p = 0.02) but lower MSTS scores (p < 0.05) compared to the PSM group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PSM technique can significantly reduce postoperative complication rates and enhance postoperative function following type III pelvic bone tumor resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9847202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98472022023-01-19 The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study Du, Xinhui Wei, Hua Zhang, Boya Gao, Shilei Li, Zhehuang Yao, Weitao World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Type III pelvic bone tumor resections are often accompanied by postoperative complications. In order to reduce complications, we developed a novel pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique to reconstruct the pelvic ring defect. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and risks of this PSM technique in type III pelvic bone tumor resections by comparing outcomes between patients that underwent PSM reconstruction and patients that did not receive any reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive set of patients that underwent type III pelvic bone tumor surgeries in our center from January 2020 to January 2021 with either PSM reconstruction (designated as the PSM group) or without any reconstruction (designated as the control group). General information such as age, gender, tumor type, tumor size, and surgical-related information such as duration of surgery, blood loss, and the surgical margins was collected. Outcome data recorded included wound complications such as infection and dehiscence, local recurrence, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores for postoperative functional evaluation. Statistical analysis between both groups was performed with GraphPad Prism v7. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in this study (PSM group n = 12, control group n = 8). While no herniation was found in the PSM group, it occurred in 6 of 8 cases in the control group. The control group showed a significantly higher rate of bacterial infection (p = 0.03) and wound dehiscence (p = 0.02) but lower MSTS scores (p < 0.05) compared to the PSM group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PSM technique can significantly reduce postoperative complication rates and enhance postoperative function following type III pelvic bone tumor resection. BioMed Central 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9847202/ /pubmed/36653790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02905-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Du, Xinhui
Wei, Hua
Zhang, Boya
Gao, Shilei
Li, Zhehuang
Yao, Weitao
The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study
title The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study
title_full The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study
title_fullStr The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study
title_short The pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (PSM) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type III pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study
title_sort pedicled sartorius flap and mesh (psm) technique vs no reconstruction in repairing the defect after type iii pelvic bone tumor resection: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02905-1
work_keys_str_mv AT duxinhui thepedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT weihua thepedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT zhangboya thepedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT gaoshilei thepedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT lizhehuang thepedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT yaoweitao thepedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT duxinhui pedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT weihua pedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT zhangboya pedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT gaoshilei pedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT lizhehuang pedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy
AT yaoweitao pedicledsartoriusflapandmeshpsmtechniquevsnoreconstructioninrepairingthedefectaftertypeiiipelvicbonetumorresectionaretrospectivestudy