Cargando…

Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration

Repairing injured tendon or ligament attachments to bones (enthesis) remains costly and challenging. Despite superb surgical management, the disorganized enthesis newly formed after surgery accounts for high recurrence rates after operations. Tissue engineering offers efficient alternatives to promo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yibo, Zhou, Mo, Zheng, Wenzhuo, Yang, Jianying, Jiang, Nan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbac091
_version_ 1784871478124085248
author Li, Yibo
Zhou, Mo
Zheng, Wenzhuo
Yang, Jianying
Jiang, Nan
author_facet Li, Yibo
Zhou, Mo
Zheng, Wenzhuo
Yang, Jianying
Jiang, Nan
author_sort Li, Yibo
collection PubMed
description Repairing injured tendon or ligament attachments to bones (enthesis) remains costly and challenging. Despite superb surgical management, the disorganized enthesis newly formed after surgery accounts for high recurrence rates after operations. Tissue engineering offers efficient alternatives to promote healing and regeneration of the specialized enthesis tissue. Load-transmitting functions thus can be restored with appropriate biomaterials and engineering strategies. Interestingly, recent studies have focused more on microstructure especially the arrangement of fibers since Rossetti successfully demonstrated the variability of fiber underspecific external force. In this review, we provide an important update on the current strategies for scaffold-based tissue engineering of enthesis when natural structure and properties are equally emphasized. We firstly described compositions, structures and features of natural enthesis with their special mechanical properties highlighted. Stimuli for growth, development and healing of enthesis widely used in popular strategies are systematically summarized. We discuss the fabrication of engineering scaffolds from the aspects of biomaterials, techniques and design strategies and comprehensively evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy. At last, this review pinpoints the remaining challenges and research directions to make breakthroughs in further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9847541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98475412023-01-20 Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration Li, Yibo Zhou, Mo Zheng, Wenzhuo Yang, Jianying Jiang, Nan Regen Biomater Review Repairing injured tendon or ligament attachments to bones (enthesis) remains costly and challenging. Despite superb surgical management, the disorganized enthesis newly formed after surgery accounts for high recurrence rates after operations. Tissue engineering offers efficient alternatives to promote healing and regeneration of the specialized enthesis tissue. Load-transmitting functions thus can be restored with appropriate biomaterials and engineering strategies. Interestingly, recent studies have focused more on microstructure especially the arrangement of fibers since Rossetti successfully demonstrated the variability of fiber underspecific external force. In this review, we provide an important update on the current strategies for scaffold-based tissue engineering of enthesis when natural structure and properties are equally emphasized. We firstly described compositions, structures and features of natural enthesis with their special mechanical properties highlighted. Stimuli for growth, development and healing of enthesis widely used in popular strategies are systematically summarized. We discuss the fabrication of engineering scaffolds from the aspects of biomaterials, techniques and design strategies and comprehensively evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy. At last, this review pinpoints the remaining challenges and research directions to make breakthroughs in further studies. Oxford University Press 2022-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9847541/ /pubmed/36683751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbac091 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Li, Yibo
Zhou, Mo
Zheng, Wenzhuo
Yang, Jianying
Jiang, Nan
Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration
title Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration
title_full Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration
title_fullStr Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration
title_short Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration
title_sort scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft–hard interface regeneration
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbac091
work_keys_str_mv AT liyibo scaffoldbasedtissueengineeringstrategiesforsofthardinterfaceregeneration
AT zhoumo scaffoldbasedtissueengineeringstrategiesforsofthardinterfaceregeneration
AT zhengwenzhuo scaffoldbasedtissueengineeringstrategiesforsofthardinterfaceregeneration
AT yangjianying scaffoldbasedtissueengineeringstrategiesforsofthardinterfaceregeneration
AT jiangnan scaffoldbasedtissueengineeringstrategiesforsofthardinterfaceregeneration