Cargando…

Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs

Measurement of the surface free energy (SFE) of a material allows the prediction of its adhesion properties. Materials can have microscale or sub-microscale surface inhomogeneities, engineered or random, which affect the surface macroscopic behaviour. However, quantitative characterization of the SF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haq, Ehtsham-Ul, Zhang, Yongliang, O'Dowd, Noel, Liu, Ning, Leesment, Stanislav, Becker, Claude, Rossi, Edoardo M., Sebastiani, Marco, Tofail, Syed A. M., Silien, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36741155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05508b
_version_ 1784871508975288320
author Haq, Ehtsham-Ul
Zhang, Yongliang
O'Dowd, Noel
Liu, Ning
Leesment, Stanislav
Becker, Claude
Rossi, Edoardo M.
Sebastiani, Marco
Tofail, Syed A. M.
Silien, Christophe
author_facet Haq, Ehtsham-Ul
Zhang, Yongliang
O'Dowd, Noel
Liu, Ning
Leesment, Stanislav
Becker, Claude
Rossi, Edoardo M.
Sebastiani, Marco
Tofail, Syed A. M.
Silien, Christophe
author_sort Haq, Ehtsham-Ul
collection PubMed
description Measurement of the surface free energy (SFE) of a material allows the prediction of its adhesion properties. Materials can have microscale or sub-microscale surface inhomogeneities, engineered or random, which affect the surface macroscopic behaviour. However, quantitative characterization of the SFE at such length scales remains challenging in view of the variety of instruments and techniques available, the poor knowledge of critical variables and parameters during measurements and the need for appropriate contact models to derive the SFE from the measurements. Failure to characterize adhesion correctly may result in defective components or lengthy process optimization costing billions to industry. Conversely, for planar and homogeneous surfaces, contact angle (CA) measurements are standardized and allow for calculating the SFE using for example the Owen–Wendt model, relying only on the properties of the probing liquids. As such, we assessed and report here a method to correlate quantitative measurements of force–distance curves made with an atomic force microscope (AFM) and with silica and polystyrene (PS) colloidal probe pairs, with quantitative CA measurements and CA-derived SFE values. We measured five surfaces (mica, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, thermally grown silica on silicon, silicon, and silicon with a super-hydrophobic coating), ranging from hydrophilic to super-hydrophobic, and found an excellent classification of the AFM measurements when these are represented by a set of principal components (PCs), and when both silica and PS colloidal probes are considered together. A regression of the PCs onto the CA measurements allows recovery of the SFE at the length scale of the colloidal probes, which is here ca. 1 micron. We found that once the PC-regression model is built, test sets of only ten AFM force–distance curves are sufficient to predict the local SFE with the calibrated silica and PS colloidal probes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9847652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98476522023-02-03 Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs Haq, Ehtsham-Ul Zhang, Yongliang O'Dowd, Noel Liu, Ning Leesment, Stanislav Becker, Claude Rossi, Edoardo M. Sebastiani, Marco Tofail, Syed A. M. Silien, Christophe RSC Adv Chemistry Measurement of the surface free energy (SFE) of a material allows the prediction of its adhesion properties. Materials can have microscale or sub-microscale surface inhomogeneities, engineered or random, which affect the surface macroscopic behaviour. However, quantitative characterization of the SFE at such length scales remains challenging in view of the variety of instruments and techniques available, the poor knowledge of critical variables and parameters during measurements and the need for appropriate contact models to derive the SFE from the measurements. Failure to characterize adhesion correctly may result in defective components or lengthy process optimization costing billions to industry. Conversely, for planar and homogeneous surfaces, contact angle (CA) measurements are standardized and allow for calculating the SFE using for example the Owen–Wendt model, relying only on the properties of the probing liquids. As such, we assessed and report here a method to correlate quantitative measurements of force–distance curves made with an atomic force microscope (AFM) and with silica and polystyrene (PS) colloidal probe pairs, with quantitative CA measurements and CA-derived SFE values. We measured five surfaces (mica, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, thermally grown silica on silicon, silicon, and silicon with a super-hydrophobic coating), ranging from hydrophilic to super-hydrophobic, and found an excellent classification of the AFM measurements when these are represented by a set of principal components (PCs), and when both silica and PS colloidal probes are considered together. A regression of the PCs onto the CA measurements allows recovery of the SFE at the length scale of the colloidal probes, which is here ca. 1 micron. We found that once the PC-regression model is built, test sets of only ten AFM force–distance curves are sufficient to predict the local SFE with the calibrated silica and PS colloidal probes. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9847652/ /pubmed/36741155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05508b Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Haq, Ehtsham-Ul
Zhang, Yongliang
O'Dowd, Noel
Liu, Ning
Leesment, Stanislav
Becker, Claude
Rossi, Edoardo M.
Sebastiani, Marco
Tofail, Syed A. M.
Silien, Christophe
Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs
title Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs
title_full Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs
title_fullStr Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs
title_short Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs
title_sort quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36741155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05508b
work_keys_str_mv AT haqehtshamul quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT zhangyongliang quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT odowdnoel quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT liuning quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT leesmentstanislav quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT beckerclaude quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT rossiedoardom quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT sebastianimarco quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT tofailsyedam quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs
AT silienchristophe quantitativesurfacefreeenergywithmicrocolloidprobepairs