Cargando…

Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model

Many machine learning (ML) models have been developed for application in the ICU, but few models have been subjected to external validation. The performance of these models in new settings therefore remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of an existing decision su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Hond, Anne A. H., Kant, Ilse M. J., Fornasa, Mattia, Cinà, Giovanni, Elbers, Paul W. G., Thoral, Patrick J., Sesmu Arbous, M., Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36524820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005758
_version_ 1784871655748665344
author de Hond, Anne A. H.
Kant, Ilse M. J.
Fornasa, Mattia
Cinà, Giovanni
Elbers, Paul W. G.
Thoral, Patrick J.
Sesmu Arbous, M.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
author_facet de Hond, Anne A. H.
Kant, Ilse M. J.
Fornasa, Mattia
Cinà, Giovanni
Elbers, Paul W. G.
Thoral, Patrick J.
Sesmu Arbous, M.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
author_sort de Hond, Anne A. H.
collection PubMed
description Many machine learning (ML) models have been developed for application in the ICU, but few models have been subjected to external validation. The performance of these models in new settings therefore remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of an existing decision support tool based on a ML model predicting readmission or death within 7 days after ICU discharge before, during, and after retraining and recalibration. DESIGN: A gradient boosted ML model was developed and validated on electronic health record data from 2004 to 2021. We performed an independent validation of this model on electronic health record data from 2011 to 2019 from a different tertiary care center. SETTING: Two ICUs in tertiary care centers in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Adult patients who were admitted to the ICU and stayed for longer than 12 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed discrimination by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration (slope and intercept). We retrained and recalibrated the original model and assessed performance via a temporal validation design. The final retrained model was cross-validated on all data from the new site. Readmission or death within 7 days after ICU discharge occurred in 577 of 10,052 ICU admissions (5.7%) at the new site. External validation revealed moderate discrimination with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.76). Retrained models showed improved discrimination with AUC 0.79 (95% CI 0.75–0.82) for the final validation model. Calibration was poor initially and good after recalibration via isotonic regression. CONCLUSIONS: In this era of expanding availability of ML models, external validation and retraining are key steps to consider before applying ML models to new settings. Clinicians and decision-makers should take this into account when considering applying new ML models to their local settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9848213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98482132023-01-19 Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model de Hond, Anne A. H. Kant, Ilse M. J. Fornasa, Mattia Cinà, Giovanni Elbers, Paul W. G. Thoral, Patrick J. Sesmu Arbous, M. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Crit Care Med Clinical Investigations Many machine learning (ML) models have been developed for application in the ICU, but few models have been subjected to external validation. The performance of these models in new settings therefore remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of an existing decision support tool based on a ML model predicting readmission or death within 7 days after ICU discharge before, during, and after retraining and recalibration. DESIGN: A gradient boosted ML model was developed and validated on electronic health record data from 2004 to 2021. We performed an independent validation of this model on electronic health record data from 2011 to 2019 from a different tertiary care center. SETTING: Two ICUs in tertiary care centers in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Adult patients who were admitted to the ICU and stayed for longer than 12 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed discrimination by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration (slope and intercept). We retrained and recalibrated the original model and assessed performance via a temporal validation design. The final retrained model was cross-validated on all data from the new site. Readmission or death within 7 days after ICU discharge occurred in 577 of 10,052 ICU admissions (5.7%) at the new site. External validation revealed moderate discrimination with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.76). Retrained models showed improved discrimination with AUC 0.79 (95% CI 0.75–0.82) for the final validation model. Calibration was poor initially and good after recalibration via isotonic regression. CONCLUSIONS: In this era of expanding availability of ML models, external validation and retraining are key steps to consider before applying ML models to new settings. Clinicians and decision-makers should take this into account when considering applying new ML models to their local settings. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-16 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9848213/ /pubmed/36524820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005758 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
de Hond, Anne A. H.
Kant, Ilse M. J.
Fornasa, Mattia
Cinà, Giovanni
Elbers, Paul W. G.
Thoral, Patrick J.
Sesmu Arbous, M.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model
title Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model
title_full Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model
title_fullStr Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model
title_short Predicting Readmission or Death After Discharge From the ICU: External Validation and Retraining of a Machine Learning Model
title_sort predicting readmission or death after discharge from the icu: external validation and retraining of a machine learning model
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36524820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005758
work_keys_str_mv AT dehondanneah predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel
AT kantilsemj predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel
AT fornasamattia predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel
AT cinagiovanni predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel
AT elberspaulwg predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel
AT thoralpatrickj predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel
AT sesmuarbousm predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel
AT steyerbergewoutw predictingreadmissionordeathafterdischargefromtheicuexternalvalidationandretrainingofamachinelearningmodel