Cargando…
Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users
BACKGROUND: A body-powered functional and cosmetically appeasing hand with moving interphalangeal joints (IPJ-Hand) was created. Function and satisfaction with the IPJ-Hand, conventional hand (CH) and functional hook (FH) in trans-radial prosthesis users were evaluated. METHODS: Eight participants w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2166979 |
_version_ | 1784871666760810496 |
---|---|
author | Sutthison, Natthawan Sasaki, Kazuhiko Guerra, Gary Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat Niamsang, Wisavaporn Charatrungolan, Thanatat |
author_facet | Sutthison, Natthawan Sasaki, Kazuhiko Guerra, Gary Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat Niamsang, Wisavaporn Charatrungolan, Thanatat |
author_sort | Sutthison, Natthawan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A body-powered functional and cosmetically appeasing hand with moving interphalangeal joints (IPJ-Hand) was created. Function and satisfaction with the IPJ-Hand, conventional hand (CH) and functional hook (FH) in trans-radial prosthesis users were evaluated. METHODS: Eight participants with trans-radial amputations were provided with three prosthetic hands and performed the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Brief Activity Measure of Upper Limb Amputees (BAM-ULA) and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology QUEST). RESULTS: The data are shown as the median and interquartile range (IQR) due to skewed data distribution. Differences across hands were seen in NHPT with CH 57 (13.3), FH 49.5 (26.5), IPJ-H and 49 (14.8) seconds respectively. BAM-ULA, 10 (1.5), FH 10 (0.7), and IPJ-Hand 10 (1.7). QUEST scores, FH 28.5 (7.2) with the highest score, IPJ-Hand 26 (6.8), and lastly CH 25.5 (9.2). CONCLUSION: Individual participant results varied, with some participants performing better on the NHPT when using the IPJ-Hand when compared to the CH and FH. No differences between hands on the BAM-ULA were seen, and although no large differences in QUEST were observed, users performed best using IPJ-Hand. KEY MESSAGES: An interphalangeal joint prosthetic hand (IPJ-Hand) offers the similar function of a prosthetic hook, and the appearance of a conventional hand, but with improved dexterity. Minimal resources are needed to create the IPJ-Hand for prosthesis wearers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9848253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98482532023-01-19 Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users Sutthison, Natthawan Sasaki, Kazuhiko Guerra, Gary Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat Niamsang, Wisavaporn Charatrungolan, Thanatat Ann Med Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation BACKGROUND: A body-powered functional and cosmetically appeasing hand with moving interphalangeal joints (IPJ-Hand) was created. Function and satisfaction with the IPJ-Hand, conventional hand (CH) and functional hook (FH) in trans-radial prosthesis users were evaluated. METHODS: Eight participants with trans-radial amputations were provided with three prosthetic hands and performed the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Brief Activity Measure of Upper Limb Amputees (BAM-ULA) and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology QUEST). RESULTS: The data are shown as the median and interquartile range (IQR) due to skewed data distribution. Differences across hands were seen in NHPT with CH 57 (13.3), FH 49.5 (26.5), IPJ-H and 49 (14.8) seconds respectively. BAM-ULA, 10 (1.5), FH 10 (0.7), and IPJ-Hand 10 (1.7). QUEST scores, FH 28.5 (7.2) with the highest score, IPJ-Hand 26 (6.8), and lastly CH 25.5 (9.2). CONCLUSION: Individual participant results varied, with some participants performing better on the NHPT when using the IPJ-Hand when compared to the CH and FH. No differences between hands on the BAM-ULA were seen, and although no large differences in QUEST were observed, users performed best using IPJ-Hand. KEY MESSAGES: An interphalangeal joint prosthetic hand (IPJ-Hand) offers the similar function of a prosthetic hook, and the appearance of a conventional hand, but with improved dexterity. Minimal resources are needed to create the IPJ-Hand for prosthesis wearers. Taylor & Francis 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9848253/ /pubmed/36644976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2166979 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Sutthison, Natthawan Sasaki, Kazuhiko Guerra, Gary Chaisumritchoke, Sirarat Niamsang, Wisavaporn Charatrungolan, Thanatat Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users |
title | Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users |
title_full | Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users |
title_short | Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users |
title_sort | evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users |
topic | Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2166979 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sutthisonnatthawan evaluationofaninterphalangealjointprosthetichandintransradialprosthesisusers AT sasakikazuhiko evaluationofaninterphalangealjointprosthetichandintransradialprosthesisusers AT guerragary evaluationofaninterphalangealjointprosthetichandintransradialprosthesisusers AT chaisumritchokesirarat evaluationofaninterphalangealjointprosthetichandintransradialprosthesisusers AT niamsangwisavaporn evaluationofaninterphalangealjointprosthetichandintransradialprosthesisusers AT charatrungolanthanatat evaluationofaninterphalangealjointprosthetichandintransradialprosthesisusers |