Cargando…

Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism

Cather-directed therapies (CDTs) are an evolving therapeutic option for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Although many techniques have been studied, there is limited evidence for the impact of timing of intervention on patient outcomes. Our objective was to assess the associa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehr, Andrew, Guichet, Phillip, Garimella, Bhaskara, Krolikowski, Kelsey, Amoroso, Nancy, Sista, Akhilesh, Brosnahan, Shari B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000828
_version_ 1784871732803272704
author Lehr, Andrew
Guichet, Phillip
Garimella, Bhaskara
Krolikowski, Kelsey
Amoroso, Nancy
Sista, Akhilesh
Brosnahan, Shari B.
author_facet Lehr, Andrew
Guichet, Phillip
Garimella, Bhaskara
Krolikowski, Kelsey
Amoroso, Nancy
Sista, Akhilesh
Brosnahan, Shari B.
author_sort Lehr, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Cather-directed therapies (CDTs) are an evolving therapeutic option for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Although many techniques have been studied, there is limited evidence for the impact of timing of intervention on patient outcomes. Our objective was to assess the association between time to CDT in patients presenting with PE on patient-related outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) and mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic center. PATIENTS: We identified patients for which the PE response team had been activated from January 2014 to October 2021. Patients were split into two cohorts depending on whether they went to CDT less than 24 hours from admission (early) versus greater than 24 hours (late). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data on demographics, timing of interventions, pulmonary hemodynamics, and outcomes were collected. Sixty-four patients were included in analysis. Thirty-nine (63.8%) underwent their procedure less than 24 hours from admission, whereas 25 (36.2%) underwent the procedure after 24 hours. The time from admission to CDT was 15.9 hours (9.1–20.3 hr) in the early group versus 33.4 (27.9–41) in the late group (p ≤ 0.001). There was a greater decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure after intervention in the early cohort (14 mm Hg [6–20 mm Hg] vs 6 mm Hg [1–10 mm Hg]; p = 0.022). Patients who received earlier intervention were found to have shorter hospital LOS (4 vs 7 d; p = 0.038) and ICU LOS (3 vs 5 d; p = 0.004). There was no difference in inhospital mortality between the groups (17.9% vs 12%; p = 0.523). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent CDT within 24 hours of admission were more likely to have shorter hospital and ICU LOS. The magnitude of change in LOS between the two cohorts was not fully explained by the difference in time to CDT. There were modest improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics in the patients who underwent CDT earlier.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9848527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98485272023-01-24 Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism Lehr, Andrew Guichet, Phillip Garimella, Bhaskara Krolikowski, Kelsey Amoroso, Nancy Sista, Akhilesh Brosnahan, Shari B. Crit Care Explor Observational Study Cather-directed therapies (CDTs) are an evolving therapeutic option for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Although many techniques have been studied, there is limited evidence for the impact of timing of intervention on patient outcomes. Our objective was to assess the association between time to CDT in patients presenting with PE on patient-related outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) and mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic center. PATIENTS: We identified patients for which the PE response team had been activated from January 2014 to October 2021. Patients were split into two cohorts depending on whether they went to CDT less than 24 hours from admission (early) versus greater than 24 hours (late). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data on demographics, timing of interventions, pulmonary hemodynamics, and outcomes were collected. Sixty-four patients were included in analysis. Thirty-nine (63.8%) underwent their procedure less than 24 hours from admission, whereas 25 (36.2%) underwent the procedure after 24 hours. The time from admission to CDT was 15.9 hours (9.1–20.3 hr) in the early group versus 33.4 (27.9–41) in the late group (p ≤ 0.001). There was a greater decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure after intervention in the early cohort (14 mm Hg [6–20 mm Hg] vs 6 mm Hg [1–10 mm Hg]; p = 0.022). Patients who received earlier intervention were found to have shorter hospital LOS (4 vs 7 d; p = 0.038) and ICU LOS (3 vs 5 d; p = 0.004). There was no difference in inhospital mortality between the groups (17.9% vs 12%; p = 0.523). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent CDT within 24 hours of admission were more likely to have shorter hospital and ICU LOS. The magnitude of change in LOS between the two cohorts was not fully explained by the difference in time to CDT. There were modest improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics in the patients who underwent CDT earlier. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9848527/ /pubmed/36699257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000828 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Lehr, Andrew
Guichet, Phillip
Garimella, Bhaskara
Krolikowski, Kelsey
Amoroso, Nancy
Sista, Akhilesh
Brosnahan, Shari B.
Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism
title Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism
title_full Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism
title_fullStr Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism
title_short Impact of Time to Intervention on Catheter-Directed Therapy for Pulmonary Embolism
title_sort impact of time to intervention on catheter-directed therapy for pulmonary embolism
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000828
work_keys_str_mv AT lehrandrew impactoftimetointerventiononcatheterdirectedtherapyforpulmonaryembolism
AT guichetphillip impactoftimetointerventiononcatheterdirectedtherapyforpulmonaryembolism
AT garimellabhaskara impactoftimetointerventiononcatheterdirectedtherapyforpulmonaryembolism
AT krolikowskikelsey impactoftimetointerventiononcatheterdirectedtherapyforpulmonaryembolism
AT amorosonancy impactoftimetointerventiononcatheterdirectedtherapyforpulmonaryembolism
AT sistaakhilesh impactoftimetointerventiononcatheterdirectedtherapyforpulmonaryembolism
AT brosnahansharib impactoftimetointerventiononcatheterdirectedtherapyforpulmonaryembolism