Cargando…

Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap

Abdominal incisional hernia is a complication of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAMC) flap harvest. This study aimed to compare the incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and donor-site closure time between absorbable barbed continuous (ABC) and non-absorbable non-barbed interrupted (nAnBI) me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitano, Daiki, Nomura, Tadashi, Sakakibara, Shunsuke, Terashi, Hiroto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004742
_version_ 1784871734071001088
author Kitano, Daiki
Nomura, Tadashi
Sakakibara, Shunsuke
Terashi, Hiroto
author_facet Kitano, Daiki
Nomura, Tadashi
Sakakibara, Shunsuke
Terashi, Hiroto
author_sort Kitano, Daiki
collection PubMed
description Abdominal incisional hernia is a complication of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAMC) flap harvest. This study aimed to compare the incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and donor-site closure time between absorbable barbed continuous (ABC) and non-absorbable non-barbed interrupted (nAnBI) methods. METHODS: This study included 145 patients who underwent free RAMC flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery at Kobe University Hospital between January 2012 and March 2020. The nAnBI method was selected between January 2012 and August 2016, and the ABC method was selected between September 2016 and March 2020. The incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and the average time required for donor-site closure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients surveyed, 116 (57 and 59 in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively) were followed-up for at least 90 days after the surgery. The incidence rates of abdominal incisional hernia were 0% and 5.1% (n = 3) in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.244). The average donor-site closure times were 127.6 and 111.3 minutes in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and donor-site closure time were observed between the nAnBI and ABC groups. However, there was a tendency for increased hernia occurrence and shorter wound closure time in the ABC group. A randomized prospective multicenter study is warranted to validate our findings of the ABC method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9848532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98485322023-01-24 Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Kitano, Daiki Nomura, Tadashi Sakakibara, Shunsuke Terashi, Hiroto Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Reconstructive Abdominal incisional hernia is a complication of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAMC) flap harvest. This study aimed to compare the incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and donor-site closure time between absorbable barbed continuous (ABC) and non-absorbable non-barbed interrupted (nAnBI) methods. METHODS: This study included 145 patients who underwent free RAMC flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery at Kobe University Hospital between January 2012 and March 2020. The nAnBI method was selected between January 2012 and August 2016, and the ABC method was selected between September 2016 and March 2020. The incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and the average time required for donor-site closure were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients surveyed, 116 (57 and 59 in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively) were followed-up for at least 90 days after the surgery. The incidence rates of abdominal incisional hernia were 0% and 5.1% (n = 3) in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.244). The average donor-site closure times were 127.6 and 111.3 minutes in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and donor-site closure time were observed between the nAnBI and ABC groups. However, there was a tendency for increased hernia occurrence and shorter wound closure time in the ABC group. A randomized prospective multicenter study is warranted to validate our findings of the ABC method. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9848532/ /pubmed/36699207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004742 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reconstructive
Kitano, Daiki
Nomura, Tadashi
Sakakibara, Shunsuke
Terashi, Hiroto
Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
title Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
title_full Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
title_fullStr Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
title_full_unstemmed Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
title_short Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
title_sort absorbable barbed continuous versus nonabsorbable nonbarbed interrupted suturing methods for donor-site closure of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap
topic Reconstructive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004742
work_keys_str_mv AT kitanodaiki absorbablebarbedcontinuousversusnonabsorbablenonbarbedinterruptedsuturingmethodsfordonorsiteclosureoftherectusabdominismyocutaneousflap
AT nomuratadashi absorbablebarbedcontinuousversusnonabsorbablenonbarbedinterruptedsuturingmethodsfordonorsiteclosureoftherectusabdominismyocutaneousflap
AT sakakibarashunsuke absorbablebarbedcontinuousversusnonabsorbablenonbarbedinterruptedsuturingmethodsfordonorsiteclosureoftherectusabdominismyocutaneousflap
AT terashihiroto absorbablebarbedcontinuousversusnonabsorbablenonbarbedinterruptedsuturingmethodsfordonorsiteclosureoftherectusabdominismyocutaneousflap