Cargando…

Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments

INTRODUCTION: Despite their importance for the global carbon cycle and crop production, species with C(4) photosynthesis are still somewhat understudied relative to C(3) species. Although the benefits of the C(4) carbon concentrating mechanism are readily observable under optimal steady state condit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arce Cubas, Lucía, Vath, Richard L., Bernardo, Emmanuel L., Sales, Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel, Burnett, Angela C., Kromdijk, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115
_version_ 1784871759418228736
author Arce Cubas, Lucía
Vath, Richard L.
Bernardo, Emmanuel L.
Sales, Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel
Burnett, Angela C.
Kromdijk, Johannes
author_facet Arce Cubas, Lucía
Vath, Richard L.
Bernardo, Emmanuel L.
Sales, Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel
Burnett, Angela C.
Kromdijk, Johannes
author_sort Arce Cubas, Lucía
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite their importance for the global carbon cycle and crop production, species with C(4) photosynthesis are still somewhat understudied relative to C(3) species. Although the benefits of the C(4) carbon concentrating mechanism are readily observable under optimal steady state conditions, it is less clear how the presence of C(4) affects activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction. METHODS: In this study we aimed to characterise differences between C(4) and C(3) photosynthetic induction responses by analysing steady state photosynthesis and photosynthetic induction in three phylogenetically linked pairs of C(3) and C(4) species from Alloteropsis, Flaveria, and Cleome genera. Experiments were conducted both at 21% and 2% O(2) to evaluate the role of photorespiration during photosynthetic induction. RESULTS: Our results confirm C(4) species have slower activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction than C(3) species, but the apparent mechanism behind these differences varied between genera. Incomplete suppression of photorespiration was found to impact photosynthetic induction significantly in C(4) Flaveria bidentis, whereas in the Cleome and Alloteropsis C(4) species, delayed activation of the C(3) cycle appeared to limit induction and a potentially supporting role for photorespiration was also identified. DISCUSSION: The sheer variation in photosynthetic induction responses observed in our limited sample of species highlights the importance of controlling for evolutionary distance when comparing C(3) and C(4) photosynthetic pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9848656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98486562023-01-19 Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments Arce Cubas, Lucía Vath, Richard L. Bernardo, Emmanuel L. Sales, Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel Burnett, Angela C. Kromdijk, Johannes Front Plant Sci Plant Science INTRODUCTION: Despite their importance for the global carbon cycle and crop production, species with C(4) photosynthesis are still somewhat understudied relative to C(3) species. Although the benefits of the C(4) carbon concentrating mechanism are readily observable under optimal steady state conditions, it is less clear how the presence of C(4) affects activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction. METHODS: In this study we aimed to characterise differences between C(4) and C(3) photosynthetic induction responses by analysing steady state photosynthesis and photosynthetic induction in three phylogenetically linked pairs of C(3) and C(4) species from Alloteropsis, Flaveria, and Cleome genera. Experiments were conducted both at 21% and 2% O(2) to evaluate the role of photorespiration during photosynthetic induction. RESULTS: Our results confirm C(4) species have slower activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction than C(3) species, but the apparent mechanism behind these differences varied between genera. Incomplete suppression of photorespiration was found to impact photosynthetic induction significantly in C(4) Flaveria bidentis, whereas in the Cleome and Alloteropsis C(4) species, delayed activation of the C(3) cycle appeared to limit induction and a potentially supporting role for photorespiration was also identified. DISCUSSION: The sheer variation in photosynthetic induction responses observed in our limited sample of species highlights the importance of controlling for evolutionary distance when comparing C(3) and C(4) photosynthetic pathways. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9848656/ /pubmed/36684779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115 Text en Copyright © 2023 Arce Cubas, Vath, Bernardo, Sales, Burnett and Kromdijk https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Arce Cubas, Lucía
Vath, Richard L.
Bernardo, Emmanuel L.
Sales, Cristina Rodrigues Gabriel
Burnett, Angela C.
Kromdijk, Johannes
Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments
title Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments
title_full Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments
title_fullStr Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments
title_full_unstemmed Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments
title_short Activation of CO(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C(4) than in C(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments
title_sort activation of co(2) assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in c(4) than in c(3) photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115
work_keys_str_mv AT arcecubaslucia activationofco2assimilationduringphotosyntheticinductionisslowerinc4thaninc3photosynthesisinthreephylogeneticallycontrolledexperiments
AT vathrichardl activationofco2assimilationduringphotosyntheticinductionisslowerinc4thaninc3photosynthesisinthreephylogeneticallycontrolledexperiments
AT bernardoemmanuell activationofco2assimilationduringphotosyntheticinductionisslowerinc4thaninc3photosynthesisinthreephylogeneticallycontrolledexperiments
AT salescristinarodriguesgabriel activationofco2assimilationduringphotosyntheticinductionisslowerinc4thaninc3photosynthesisinthreephylogeneticallycontrolledexperiments
AT burnettangelac activationofco2assimilationduringphotosyntheticinductionisslowerinc4thaninc3photosynthesisinthreephylogeneticallycontrolledexperiments
AT kromdijkjohannes activationofco2assimilationduringphotosyntheticinductionisslowerinc4thaninc3photosynthesisinthreephylogeneticallycontrolledexperiments