Cargando…

More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021

This is a response to a preprint version of “A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science”, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.28.441626v2. Meier et al. stron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharkey, Michael J., Tucker, Erika M., Baker, Austin, Smith, M. Alex, Ratnasingham, Sujeevan, Manjunath, Ramya, Hebert, Paul, Hallwachs, Winnie, Janzen, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1110.85491
_version_ 1784871766751969280
author Sharkey, Michael J.
Tucker, Erika M.
Baker, Austin
Smith, M. Alex
Ratnasingham, Sujeevan
Manjunath, Ramya
Hebert, Paul
Hallwachs, Winnie
Janzen, Daniel
author_facet Sharkey, Michael J.
Tucker, Erika M.
Baker, Austin
Smith, M. Alex
Ratnasingham, Sujeevan
Manjunath, Ramya
Hebert, Paul
Hallwachs, Winnie
Janzen, Daniel
author_sort Sharkey, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description This is a response to a preprint version of “A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science”, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.28.441626v2. Meier et al. strongly criticized Sharkey et al.’s publication in which 403 new species were deliberately minimally described, based primarily on COI barcode sequence data. Here we respond to these criticisms. The following points are made: 1) Sharkey et al. did not equate BINs with species, as demonstrated in several examples in which multiple species were found to be in single BINs. 2) We reiterate that BINs were used as a preliminary sorting tool, just as preliminary morphological identification commonly sorts specimens based on color and size into unit trays; despite BINs and species concepts matching well over 90% of species, this matching does not equate to equality. 3) Consensus barcodes were used only to provide a diagnosis to conform to the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature just as consensus morphological diagnoses are. The barcode of a holotype is definitive and simply part of its cellular morphology. 4) Minimalist revisions will facilitate and accelerate future taxonomic research, not hinder it. 5) We refute the claim that the BOLD sequences of Plesiocoelusvanachterbergi are pseudogenes and demonstrate that they simply represent a frameshift mutation. 6) We reassert our observation that morphological evidence alone is insufficient to recognize species within species-rich higher taxa and that its usefulness lies in character states that are congruent with molecular data. 7) We show that in the cases in which COI barcodes code for the same amino acids in different putative species, data from morphology, host specificity, and other ecological traits reaffirm their utility as indicators of genetically distinct lineages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9848685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98486852023-02-08 More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 Sharkey, Michael J. Tucker, Erika M. Baker, Austin Smith, M. Alex Ratnasingham, Sujeevan Manjunath, Ramya Hebert, Paul Hallwachs, Winnie Janzen, Daniel Zookeys Forum Paper This is a response to a preprint version of “A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science”, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.28.441626v2. Meier et al. strongly criticized Sharkey et al.’s publication in which 403 new species were deliberately minimally described, based primarily on COI barcode sequence data. Here we respond to these criticisms. The following points are made: 1) Sharkey et al. did not equate BINs with species, as demonstrated in several examples in which multiple species were found to be in single BINs. 2) We reiterate that BINs were used as a preliminary sorting tool, just as preliminary morphological identification commonly sorts specimens based on color and size into unit trays; despite BINs and species concepts matching well over 90% of species, this matching does not equate to equality. 3) Consensus barcodes were used only to provide a diagnosis to conform to the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature just as consensus morphological diagnoses are. The barcode of a holotype is definitive and simply part of its cellular morphology. 4) Minimalist revisions will facilitate and accelerate future taxonomic research, not hinder it. 5) We refute the claim that the BOLD sequences of Plesiocoelusvanachterbergi are pseudogenes and demonstrate that they simply represent a frameshift mutation. 6) We reassert our observation that morphological evidence alone is insufficient to recognize species within species-rich higher taxa and that its usefulness lies in character states that are congruent with molecular data. 7) We show that in the cases in which COI barcodes code for the same amino acids in different putative species, data from morphology, host specificity, and other ecological traits reaffirm their utility as indicators of genetically distinct lineages. Pensoft Publishers 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9848685/ /pubmed/36761452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1110.85491 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
spellingShingle Forum Paper
Sharkey, Michael J.
Tucker, Erika M.
Baker, Austin
Smith, M. Alex
Ratnasingham, Sujeevan
Manjunath, Ramya
Hebert, Paul
Hallwachs, Winnie
Janzen, Daniel
More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
title More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
title_full More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
title_fullStr More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
title_full_unstemmed More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
title_short More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
title_sort more discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in meier et al. 2021
topic Forum Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761452
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1110.85491
work_keys_str_mv AT sharkeymichaelj morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT tuckererikam morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT bakeraustin morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT smithmalex morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT ratnasinghamsujeevan morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT manjunathramya morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT hebertpaul morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT hallwachswinnie morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021
AT janzendaniel morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021