Cargando…
More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021
This is a response to a preprint version of “A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science”, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.28.441626v2. Meier et al. stron...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pensoft Publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1110.85491 |
_version_ | 1784871766751969280 |
---|---|
author | Sharkey, Michael J. Tucker, Erika M. Baker, Austin Smith, M. Alex Ratnasingham, Sujeevan Manjunath, Ramya Hebert, Paul Hallwachs, Winnie Janzen, Daniel |
author_facet | Sharkey, Michael J. Tucker, Erika M. Baker, Austin Smith, M. Alex Ratnasingham, Sujeevan Manjunath, Ramya Hebert, Paul Hallwachs, Winnie Janzen, Daniel |
author_sort | Sharkey, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This is a response to a preprint version of “A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science”, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.28.441626v2. Meier et al. strongly criticized Sharkey et al.’s publication in which 403 new species were deliberately minimally described, based primarily on COI barcode sequence data. Here we respond to these criticisms. The following points are made: 1) Sharkey et al. did not equate BINs with species, as demonstrated in several examples in which multiple species were found to be in single BINs. 2) We reiterate that BINs were used as a preliminary sorting tool, just as preliminary morphological identification commonly sorts specimens based on color and size into unit trays; despite BINs and species concepts matching well over 90% of species, this matching does not equate to equality. 3) Consensus barcodes were used only to provide a diagnosis to conform to the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature just as consensus morphological diagnoses are. The barcode of a holotype is definitive and simply part of its cellular morphology. 4) Minimalist revisions will facilitate and accelerate future taxonomic research, not hinder it. 5) We refute the claim that the BOLD sequences of Plesiocoelusvanachterbergi are pseudogenes and demonstrate that they simply represent a frameshift mutation. 6) We reassert our observation that morphological evidence alone is insufficient to recognize species within species-rich higher taxa and that its usefulness lies in character states that are congruent with molecular data. 7) We show that in the cases in which COI barcodes code for the same amino acids in different putative species, data from morphology, host specificity, and other ecological traits reaffirm their utility as indicators of genetically distinct lineages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9848685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98486852023-02-08 More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 Sharkey, Michael J. Tucker, Erika M. Baker, Austin Smith, M. Alex Ratnasingham, Sujeevan Manjunath, Ramya Hebert, Paul Hallwachs, Winnie Janzen, Daniel Zookeys Forum Paper This is a response to a preprint version of “A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science”, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.28.441626v2. Meier et al. strongly criticized Sharkey et al.’s publication in which 403 new species were deliberately minimally described, based primarily on COI barcode sequence data. Here we respond to these criticisms. The following points are made: 1) Sharkey et al. did not equate BINs with species, as demonstrated in several examples in which multiple species were found to be in single BINs. 2) We reiterate that BINs were used as a preliminary sorting tool, just as preliminary morphological identification commonly sorts specimens based on color and size into unit trays; despite BINs and species concepts matching well over 90% of species, this matching does not equate to equality. 3) Consensus barcodes were used only to provide a diagnosis to conform to the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature just as consensus morphological diagnoses are. The barcode of a holotype is definitive and simply part of its cellular morphology. 4) Minimalist revisions will facilitate and accelerate future taxonomic research, not hinder it. 5) We refute the claim that the BOLD sequences of Plesiocoelusvanachterbergi are pseudogenes and demonstrate that they simply represent a frameshift mutation. 6) We reassert our observation that morphological evidence alone is insufficient to recognize species within species-rich higher taxa and that its usefulness lies in character states that are congruent with molecular data. 7) We show that in the cases in which COI barcodes code for the same amino acids in different putative species, data from morphology, host specificity, and other ecological traits reaffirm their utility as indicators of genetically distinct lineages. Pensoft Publishers 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9848685/ /pubmed/36761452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1110.85491 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. |
spellingShingle | Forum Paper Sharkey, Michael J. Tucker, Erika M. Baker, Austin Smith, M. Alex Ratnasingham, Sujeevan Manjunath, Ramya Hebert, Paul Hallwachs, Winnie Janzen, Daniel More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 |
title | More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 |
title_full | More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 |
title_fullStr | More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 |
title_short | More discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in Meier et al. 2021 |
title_sort | more discussion of minimalist species descriptions and clarifying some misconceptions contained in meier et al. 2021 |
topic | Forum Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761452 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1110.85491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharkeymichaelj morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT tuckererikam morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT bakeraustin morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT smithmalex morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT ratnasinghamsujeevan morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT manjunathramya morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT hebertpaul morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT hallwachswinnie morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 AT janzendaniel morediscussionofminimalistspeciesdescriptionsandclarifyingsomemisconceptionscontainedinmeieretal2021 |