Cargando…

Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?

Invertebrate immune priming is defined as an enhanced protection against secondary pathogenic infections when individuals have been previously exposed to the same or a different pathogen. Immune priming can be energetically costly for individuals, thus impacting trade-offs between life-history trait...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prigot-Maurice, Cybèle, Depeux, Charlotte, Paulhac, Hélène, Braquart-Varnier, Christine, Beltran-Bech, Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36760973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1101.77216
_version_ 1784871823039528960
author Prigot-Maurice, Cybèle
Depeux, Charlotte
Paulhac, Hélène
Braquart-Varnier, Christine
Beltran-Bech, Sophie
author_facet Prigot-Maurice, Cybèle
Depeux, Charlotte
Paulhac, Hélène
Braquart-Varnier, Christine
Beltran-Bech, Sophie
author_sort Prigot-Maurice, Cybèle
collection PubMed
description Invertebrate immune priming is defined as an enhanced protection against secondary pathogenic infections when individuals have been previously exposed to the same or a different pathogen. Immune priming can be energetically costly for individuals, thus impacting trade-offs between life-history traits, like reproduction, growth, and lifetime. Here, the reproductive cost(s) and senescence patterns of immune priming against S.enterica in the common woodlouse A.vulgare (Crustacea, Isopoda) were investigated. Four different groups of females were used that either (1) have never been injected (control), (2) were injected twice with S.enterica (7 days between infections), (3) were firstly injected with LB-broth, then with S.enterica, and (4) females injected only once with S.enterica. All females were allowed to breed with one non-infected male and were observed for eight months. Then, the number of clutches produced, the time taken to produce the clutch(es), the number of offspring in each clutch, the senescence biomarkers of females, and parameters of their haemocytes were compared. The result was that immune priming did not significantly impact reproductive abilities, senescence patterns, and haemocyte parameters of female A.vulgare, but had an indirect effect through body weight. The lighter immune primed females took less time to produce the first clutch, which contained less offspring, but they were more likely to produce a second clutch. The opposite effects were observed in the heavier immune primed females. By highlighting that immune priming was not as costly as expected in A.vulgare, these results provide new insights into the adaptive nature of this immune process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9848923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98489232023-02-08 Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits? Prigot-Maurice, Cybèle Depeux, Charlotte Paulhac, Hélène Braquart-Varnier, Christine Beltran-Bech, Sophie Zookeys Research Article Invertebrate immune priming is defined as an enhanced protection against secondary pathogenic infections when individuals have been previously exposed to the same or a different pathogen. Immune priming can be energetically costly for individuals, thus impacting trade-offs between life-history traits, like reproduction, growth, and lifetime. Here, the reproductive cost(s) and senescence patterns of immune priming against S.enterica in the common woodlouse A.vulgare (Crustacea, Isopoda) were investigated. Four different groups of females were used that either (1) have never been injected (control), (2) were injected twice with S.enterica (7 days between infections), (3) were firstly injected with LB-broth, then with S.enterica, and (4) females injected only once with S.enterica. All females were allowed to breed with one non-infected male and were observed for eight months. Then, the number of clutches produced, the time taken to produce the clutch(es), the number of offspring in each clutch, the senescence biomarkers of females, and parameters of their haemocytes were compared. The result was that immune priming did not significantly impact reproductive abilities, senescence patterns, and haemocyte parameters of female A.vulgare, but had an indirect effect through body weight. The lighter immune primed females took less time to produce the first clutch, which contained less offspring, but they were more likely to produce a second clutch. The opposite effects were observed in the heavier immune primed females. By highlighting that immune priming was not as costly as expected in A.vulgare, these results provide new insights into the adaptive nature of this immune process. Pensoft Publishers 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9848923/ /pubmed/36760973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1101.77216 Text en Cybèle Prigot-Maurice, Charlotte Depeux, Hélène Paulhac, Christine Braquart-Varnier, Sophie Beltran-Bech https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Prigot-Maurice, Cybèle
Depeux, Charlotte
Paulhac, Hélène
Braquart-Varnier, Christine
Beltran-Bech, Sophie
Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?
title Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?
title_full Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?
title_fullStr Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?
title_full_unstemmed Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?
title_short Immune priming in Armadillidiumvulgare against Salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?
title_sort immune priming in armadillidiumvulgare against salmonellaenterica: direct or indirect costs on life history traits?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9848923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36760973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1101.77216
work_keys_str_mv AT prigotmauricecybele immunepriminginarmadillidiumvulgareagainstsalmonellaentericadirectorindirectcostsonlifehistorytraits
AT depeuxcharlotte immunepriminginarmadillidiumvulgareagainstsalmonellaentericadirectorindirectcostsonlifehistorytraits
AT paulhachelene immunepriminginarmadillidiumvulgareagainstsalmonellaentericadirectorindirectcostsonlifehistorytraits
AT braquartvarnierchristine immunepriminginarmadillidiumvulgareagainstsalmonellaentericadirectorindirectcostsonlifehistorytraits
AT beltranbechsophie immunepriminginarmadillidiumvulgareagainstsalmonellaentericadirectorindirectcostsonlifehistorytraits