Cargando…

Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?

Senegalia comprises 219 species distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of North and South America, Africa, Asia and Australia. Two sections are currently recognised within Senegalia and these are most readily distinguished by the differences in disposition of their cauline prickles, i.e. se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terra, Vanessa, Ringelberg, Jens J., Maslin, Bruce, Koenen, Erik J. M., Ebinger, John, Seigler, David, Hughes, Colin E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.79378
_version_ 1784871852190990336
author Terra, Vanessa
Ringelberg, Jens J.
Maslin, Bruce
Koenen, Erik J. M.
Ebinger, John
Seigler, David
Hughes, Colin E.
author_facet Terra, Vanessa
Ringelberg, Jens J.
Maslin, Bruce
Koenen, Erik J. M.
Ebinger, John
Seigler, David
Hughes, Colin E.
author_sort Terra, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description Senegalia comprises 219 species distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of North and South America, Africa, Asia and Australia. Two sections are currently recognised within Senegalia and these are most readily distinguished by the differences in disposition of their cauline prickles, i.e. sect. Senegalia with prickles at or near leaf nodes and sect. Monacanthea with mostly internodal prickles. Previous phylogenetic studies, based primarily on small numbers of plastid DNA loci, found Senegalia to be monophyletic with two large subclades corresponding to the sections. Here, we present new phylogenomic evidence from 997 single-copy nuclear gene sequences for a small, but representative set of species. These new analyses show that Senegalia is non-monophyletic, but instead, forms a grade that is paraphyletic with respect to the remainder of the ingoid clade (i.e. Ingeae + Acacia s.s. + Acaciella), comprising two well-supported subclades most likely representing the same clades as found in previous phylogenetic studies of the genus and, interspersed between these, a third, moderately supported clade, comprising the genera Mariosousa, Pseudosenegalia and Parasenegalia. In marked contrast to the nuclear phylogeny, the two Senegalia clades are sister groups in the plastid phylogeny, based on analyses of 72 chloroplast genes, rendering the genus monophyletic, based on plastid data alone. We discuss this new evidence that Senegalia is non-monophyletic in relation to the marked cytonuclear discordance, high gene tree conflict and lack of resolution across this senegalioid grade and review the consistency of the key morphological characters distinguishing the two sections of Senegalia. We conclude that it is likely that Senegalia will need to be split into two (or possibly more) genera: a re-circumscribed Senegalia s.s. that corresponds to the existing Senegaliasect.Senegalia plus the S.ataxacantha group (Senegaliasect.Monacanthea s.s.; future studies may show that this group warrants generic status) and a new genus corresponding to the remainder of sect. Monacanthea (here designated as Senegaliasect.Monacanthea p.p.). However, re-delimiting Senegalia now would be premature given that the key morphological characters are not fully congruent with the two sections and pending denser phylogenetic sampling of taxa. A judiciously selected list of critical taxa is presented to facilitate future phylogenomic studies. Finally, we discuss the identity of Albizialeonardii, which is also placed in this senegalioid grade in these new phylogenomic analyses and place it in synonymy with Parasenegaliavogeliana.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9849036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98490362023-02-08 Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy? Terra, Vanessa Ringelberg, Jens J. Maslin, Bruce Koenen, Erik J. M. Ebinger, John Seigler, David Hughes, Colin E. PhytoKeys Research Article Senegalia comprises 219 species distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of North and South America, Africa, Asia and Australia. Two sections are currently recognised within Senegalia and these are most readily distinguished by the differences in disposition of their cauline prickles, i.e. sect. Senegalia with prickles at or near leaf nodes and sect. Monacanthea with mostly internodal prickles. Previous phylogenetic studies, based primarily on small numbers of plastid DNA loci, found Senegalia to be monophyletic with two large subclades corresponding to the sections. Here, we present new phylogenomic evidence from 997 single-copy nuclear gene sequences for a small, but representative set of species. These new analyses show that Senegalia is non-monophyletic, but instead, forms a grade that is paraphyletic with respect to the remainder of the ingoid clade (i.e. Ingeae + Acacia s.s. + Acaciella), comprising two well-supported subclades most likely representing the same clades as found in previous phylogenetic studies of the genus and, interspersed between these, a third, moderately supported clade, comprising the genera Mariosousa, Pseudosenegalia and Parasenegalia. In marked contrast to the nuclear phylogeny, the two Senegalia clades are sister groups in the plastid phylogeny, based on analyses of 72 chloroplast genes, rendering the genus monophyletic, based on plastid data alone. We discuss this new evidence that Senegalia is non-monophyletic in relation to the marked cytonuclear discordance, high gene tree conflict and lack of resolution across this senegalioid grade and review the consistency of the key morphological characters distinguishing the two sections of Senegalia. We conclude that it is likely that Senegalia will need to be split into two (or possibly more) genera: a re-circumscribed Senegalia s.s. that corresponds to the existing Senegaliasect.Senegalia plus the S.ataxacantha group (Senegaliasect.Monacanthea s.s.; future studies may show that this group warrants generic status) and a new genus corresponding to the remainder of sect. Monacanthea (here designated as Senegaliasect.Monacanthea p.p.). However, re-delimiting Senegalia now would be premature given that the key morphological characters are not fully congruent with the two sections and pending denser phylogenetic sampling of taxa. A judiciously selected list of critical taxa is presented to facilitate future phylogenomic studies. Finally, we discuss the identity of Albizialeonardii, which is also placed in this senegalioid grade in these new phylogenomic analyses and place it in synonymy with Parasenegaliavogeliana. Pensoft Publishers 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9849036/ /pubmed/36762013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.79378 Text en Vanessa Terra, Jens J. Ringelberg, Bruce Maslin, Erik J. M. Koenen, John Ebinger, David Seigler, Colin E. Hughes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Terra, Vanessa
Ringelberg, Jens J.
Maslin, Bruce
Koenen, Erik J. M.
Ebinger, John
Seigler, David
Hughes, Colin E.
Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?
title Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?
title_full Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?
title_fullStr Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?
title_full_unstemmed Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?
title_short Dilemmas in generic delimitation of Senegalia and allies (Caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?
title_sort dilemmas in generic delimitation of senegalia and allies (caesalpinioideae, mimosoid clade): how to reconcile phylogenomic evidence with morphology and taxonomy?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.79378
work_keys_str_mv AT terravanessa dilemmasingenericdelimitationofsenegaliaandalliescaesalpinioideaemimosoidcladehowtoreconcilephylogenomicevidencewithmorphologyandtaxonomy
AT ringelbergjensj dilemmasingenericdelimitationofsenegaliaandalliescaesalpinioideaemimosoidcladehowtoreconcilephylogenomicevidencewithmorphologyandtaxonomy
AT maslinbruce dilemmasingenericdelimitationofsenegaliaandalliescaesalpinioideaemimosoidcladehowtoreconcilephylogenomicevidencewithmorphologyandtaxonomy
AT koenenerikjm dilemmasingenericdelimitationofsenegaliaandalliescaesalpinioideaemimosoidcladehowtoreconcilephylogenomicevidencewithmorphologyandtaxonomy
AT ebingerjohn dilemmasingenericdelimitationofsenegaliaandalliescaesalpinioideaemimosoidcladehowtoreconcilephylogenomicevidencewithmorphologyandtaxonomy
AT seiglerdavid dilemmasingenericdelimitationofsenegaliaandalliescaesalpinioideaemimosoidcladehowtoreconcilephylogenomicevidencewithmorphologyandtaxonomy
AT hughescoline dilemmasingenericdelimitationofsenegaliaandalliescaesalpinioideaemimosoidcladehowtoreconcilephylogenomicevidencewithmorphologyandtaxonomy