Cargando…

Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study

BACKGROUND: Beyond guideline-directed treatments aimed at improving cardiac function and prognosis in heart failure (HF), patient-reported outcomes have gained attention. PURPOSE: Using a cross-sectional approach, we assessed symptom burden, psychosocial distress, and potential palliative care (PC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strangl, F., Ischanow, E., Ullrich, A., Oechsle, K., Fluschnik, N., Magnussen, C., Knappe, D., Grahn, H., Blankenberg, S., Bokemeyer, C., Kirchhof, P., Rybczynski, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02017-y
_version_ 1784871885377372160
author Strangl, F.
Ischanow, E.
Ullrich, A.
Oechsle, K.
Fluschnik, N.
Magnussen, C.
Knappe, D.
Grahn, H.
Blankenberg, S.
Bokemeyer, C.
Kirchhof, P.
Rybczynski, M.
author_facet Strangl, F.
Ischanow, E.
Ullrich, A.
Oechsle, K.
Fluschnik, N.
Magnussen, C.
Knappe, D.
Grahn, H.
Blankenberg, S.
Bokemeyer, C.
Kirchhof, P.
Rybczynski, M.
author_sort Strangl, F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Beyond guideline-directed treatments aimed at improving cardiac function and prognosis in heart failure (HF), patient-reported outcomes have gained attention. PURPOSE: Using a cross-sectional approach, we assessed symptom burden, psychosocial distress, and potential palliative care (PC) needs in patients with advanced stages of HF. METHODS: At a large tertiary care center, we enrolled HF patients in an exploratory pilot study. Symptom burden and psychosocial distress were assessed using the MIDOS (Minimal Documentation System for Patients in PC) questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer (DT), respectively. The 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) was used to screen for anxiety and depression. To assess PC needs, physicians used the “Palliative Care Screening Tool for HF Patients”. RESULTS: We included 259 patients, of whom 137 (53%) were enrolled at the Heart Failure Unit (HFU), and 122 (47%) at the outpatient clinic (OC). Mean age was 63 years, 72% were male. New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms were present in 56%. With a mean 5-year survival 64% (HFU) vs. 69% (OC) calculated by the Seattle Heart Failure Model, estimated prognosis was comparatively good. Symptom burden (MIDOS score 8.0 vs. 5.4, max. 30 points, p < 0.001) and level of distress (DT score 6.0 vs. 4.8, max. 10 points, p < 0.001) were higher in hospitalised patients. Clinically relevant distress was detected in the majority of patients (HFU 76% vs. OC 57%, p = 0.001), and more than one third exhibited at least mild symptoms of depression or anxiety. Screening for PC needs revealed 82% of in- and 52% of outpatients fulfil criteria for specialized palliative support. CONCLUSION: Despite a good prognosis, we found multiple undetected and unaddressed needs in an advanced HF cohort. This study’s tools and screening results may help to early explore these needs, to further improve integrated HF care. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9849173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98491732023-01-20 Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study Strangl, F. Ischanow, E. Ullrich, A. Oechsle, K. Fluschnik, N. Magnussen, C. Knappe, D. Grahn, H. Blankenberg, S. Bokemeyer, C. Kirchhof, P. Rybczynski, M. Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Beyond guideline-directed treatments aimed at improving cardiac function and prognosis in heart failure (HF), patient-reported outcomes have gained attention. PURPOSE: Using a cross-sectional approach, we assessed symptom burden, psychosocial distress, and potential palliative care (PC) needs in patients with advanced stages of HF. METHODS: At a large tertiary care center, we enrolled HF patients in an exploratory pilot study. Symptom burden and psychosocial distress were assessed using the MIDOS (Minimal Documentation System for Patients in PC) questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer (DT), respectively. The 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) was used to screen for anxiety and depression. To assess PC needs, physicians used the “Palliative Care Screening Tool for HF Patients”. RESULTS: We included 259 patients, of whom 137 (53%) were enrolled at the Heart Failure Unit (HFU), and 122 (47%) at the outpatient clinic (OC). Mean age was 63 years, 72% were male. New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms were present in 56%. With a mean 5-year survival 64% (HFU) vs. 69% (OC) calculated by the Seattle Heart Failure Model, estimated prognosis was comparatively good. Symptom burden (MIDOS score 8.0 vs. 5.4, max. 30 points, p < 0.001) and level of distress (DT score 6.0 vs. 4.8, max. 10 points, p < 0.001) were higher in hospitalised patients. Clinically relevant distress was detected in the majority of patients (HFU 76% vs. OC 57%, p = 0.001), and more than one third exhibited at least mild symptoms of depression or anxiety. Screening for PC needs revealed 82% of in- and 52% of outpatients fulfil criteria for specialized palliative support. CONCLUSION: Despite a good prognosis, we found multiple undetected and unaddressed needs in an advanced HF cohort. This study’s tools and screening results may help to early explore these needs, to further improve integrated HF care. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9849173/ /pubmed/35420358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02017-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Strangl, F.
Ischanow, E.
Ullrich, A.
Oechsle, K.
Fluschnik, N.
Magnussen, C.
Knappe, D.
Grahn, H.
Blankenberg, S.
Bokemeyer, C.
Kirchhof, P.
Rybczynski, M.
Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study
title Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study
title_full Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study
title_fullStr Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study
title_short Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study
title_sort symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – a cross-sectional explorative pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35420358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02017-y
work_keys_str_mv AT stranglf symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT ischanowe symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT ullricha symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT oechslek symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT fluschnikn symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT magnussenc symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT knapped symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT grahnh symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT blankenbergs symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT bokemeyerc symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT kirchhofp symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy
AT rybczynskim symptomburdenpsychosocialdistressandpalliativecareneedsinheartfailureacrosssectionalexplorativepilotstudy