Cargando…

Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function

PURPOSE: Studies have assessed the trauma and change in hearing function from the use of otological drills on the ossicular chain, but not the effects of partial laser ablation of the incus. A study of the effectiveness of a novel middle-ear microphone for a cochlear implant, which required an incus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morse, Robert P., Mitchell-Innes, Alistair, Prokopiou, Andreas N., Irving, Richard M., Begg, Philip A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07532-2
_version_ 1784871885624836096
author Morse, Robert P.
Mitchell-Innes, Alistair
Prokopiou, Andreas N.
Irving, Richard M.
Begg, Philip A.
author_facet Morse, Robert P.
Mitchell-Innes, Alistair
Prokopiou, Andreas N.
Irving, Richard M.
Begg, Philip A.
author_sort Morse, Robert P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Studies have assessed the trauma and change in hearing function from the use of otological drills on the ossicular chain, but not the effects of partial laser ablation of the incus. A study of the effectiveness of a novel middle-ear microphone for a cochlear implant, which required an incus recess for the microphone balltip, provided an opportunity to compare methods and inform a feasibility study of the microphone with patients. METHODS: We used laser Doppler vibrometry with an insert earphone and probe microphone in 23 ears from 14 fresh-frozen cadavers to measure the equivalent noise level at the tympanic membrane that would have led to the same stapes velocity as the creation of the incus recess. RESULTS: Drilling on the incus with a diamond burr created peak noise levels equivalent to 125.1–155.0 dB SPL at the tympanic membrane, whilst using the laser generated equivalent noise levels barely above the baseline level. The change in middle ear transfer function following drilling showed greater variability at high frequencies, but the change was not statistically significant in the three frequency bands tested. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst drilling resulted in substantially higher equivalent noise, we considered that the recess created by laser ablation was more likely to lead to movement of the microphone balltip, and therefore decrease performance or result in malfunction over time. For patients with greatly reduced residual hearing, the greater consistency from drilling the incus recess may outweigh the potential benefits of hearing preservation with laser ablation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-022-07532-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9849174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98491742023-01-20 Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function Morse, Robert P. Mitchell-Innes, Alistair Prokopiou, Andreas N. Irving, Richard M. Begg, Philip A. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Studies have assessed the trauma and change in hearing function from the use of otological drills on the ossicular chain, but not the effects of partial laser ablation of the incus. A study of the effectiveness of a novel middle-ear microphone for a cochlear implant, which required an incus recess for the microphone balltip, provided an opportunity to compare methods and inform a feasibility study of the microphone with patients. METHODS: We used laser Doppler vibrometry with an insert earphone and probe microphone in 23 ears from 14 fresh-frozen cadavers to measure the equivalent noise level at the tympanic membrane that would have led to the same stapes velocity as the creation of the incus recess. RESULTS: Drilling on the incus with a diamond burr created peak noise levels equivalent to 125.1–155.0 dB SPL at the tympanic membrane, whilst using the laser generated equivalent noise levels barely above the baseline level. The change in middle ear transfer function following drilling showed greater variability at high frequencies, but the change was not statistically significant in the three frequency bands tested. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst drilling resulted in substantially higher equivalent noise, we considered that the recess created by laser ablation was more likely to lead to movement of the microphone balltip, and therefore decrease performance or result in malfunction over time. For patients with greatly reduced residual hearing, the greater consistency from drilling the incus recess may outweigh the potential benefits of hearing preservation with laser ablation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-022-07532-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9849174/ /pubmed/35834014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07532-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Morse, Robert P.
Mitchell-Innes, Alistair
Prokopiou, Andreas N.
Irving, Richard M.
Begg, Philip A.
Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function
title Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function
title_full Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function
title_fullStr Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function
title_full_unstemmed Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function
title_short Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function
title_sort creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07532-2
work_keys_str_mv AT morserobertp creationofanincusrecessforamiddleearmicrophoneusingadrillorlaserablationacomparisonofequivalentnoiselevelandmiddleeartransferfunction
AT mitchellinnesalistair creationofanincusrecessforamiddleearmicrophoneusingadrillorlaserablationacomparisonofequivalentnoiselevelandmiddleeartransferfunction
AT prokopiouandreasn creationofanincusrecessforamiddleearmicrophoneusingadrillorlaserablationacomparisonofequivalentnoiselevelandmiddleeartransferfunction
AT irvingrichardm creationofanincusrecessforamiddleearmicrophoneusingadrillorlaserablationacomparisonofequivalentnoiselevelandmiddleeartransferfunction
AT beggphilipa creationofanincusrecessforamiddleearmicrophoneusingadrillorlaserablationacomparisonofequivalentnoiselevelandmiddleeartransferfunction