Cargando…

Both radiographical and pathological lymph node statuses are independent predictors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for cT3/4 or cN+ bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION: Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) with clinical suspicion of locally advanced growth or pelvic lymphogenic spread has a high risk of progression and death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bladder cancer patients with locally advanced (cT3/4) tumor growth or suspected pelvic lymphogenic spread (cN+...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Julia, Simon, Ricarda, Büchler, Jakob Wolf, Kirchhoff, Florian, Kehl, Viktoria, Retz, Margitta, Gschwend, Juergen Erich, Sauter, Andreas, Horn, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04187-w
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) with clinical suspicion of locally advanced growth or pelvic lymphogenic spread has a high risk of progression and death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bladder cancer patients with locally advanced (cT3/4) tumor growth or suspected pelvic lymphogenic spread (cN+) were treated with preoperative cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and consolidative cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. We aimed to identify prognostic factors and describe the patients’ oncological outcome. RESULTS: A complete dataset including follow-up data was available for 96 patients. In a univariate analysis, we identified cN stage (cN+ vs cN-, HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3–6.0), response to chemotherapy (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.5), ypT stage (ypT0/is/1 vs ypT2-4, HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4–6.8), ypN stage (ypN + vs ypN-, HR 7.9, 95% CI 3.7–17.0), resection status (HR 4.4, 95% CI HR 1.5–13.0) as significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. In a multivariate regression analysis, both cN and ypN statuses were validated as independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival (cN: HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1–6.1; ypN: HR 5.5, 95% CI 2.0–15.1). DISCUSSION: Lymph node status was identified as a prognostic marker in a high-risk cohort of UBC patients treated with inductive chemotherapy and cystectomy. Establishing cN status as a prognosticator underlines the necessity to aggressively treat these patients despite reported impreciseness of imaging procedures in UCB. Patients with histologically positive lymph nodes following preoperative chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis, and thus, the need for adjuvant systemic treatment is emphasized. CONCLUSION: Both clinically and pathologically affected lymph nodes convey a poor prognosis in bladder cancer and necessitate aggressive treatment.