Cargando…

DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership

OBJECTIVES: Against the background of e‐government, it is discussed whether self‐organization represents an independent component of digital leadership. Addressing this research question, the instrument “DigiFuehr” is being expanded to include the aspects of self‐determination and coordination. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claassen, Kevin, Rodil Dos Anjos, Dominique, Kettschau, Jan Patrick, Wrede, Sammy Joelle Shirley, Broding, Horst Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12383
_version_ 1784871965017767936
author Claassen, Kevin
Rodil Dos Anjos, Dominique
Kettschau, Jan Patrick
Wrede, Sammy Joelle Shirley
Broding, Horst Christoph
author_facet Claassen, Kevin
Rodil Dos Anjos, Dominique
Kettschau, Jan Patrick
Wrede, Sammy Joelle Shirley
Broding, Horst Christoph
author_sort Claassen, Kevin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Against the background of e‐government, it is discussed whether self‐organization represents an independent component of digital leadership. Addressing this research question, the instrument “DigiFuehr” is being expanded to include the aspects of self‐determination and coordination. The aim is to test the model quality of three adapted scales against the already established support‐focusing version. METHODS: Based on an online survey of n = 422 employees at visual display unit workstations in German municipal administrations in April 2022, the original version of DigiFuehr as well as one reduced and two extended versions were validated considering their local and global model fit. RESULTS: All four scales show a good local fit with regard to internal consistency (Cronbach's α), discriminatory power, and dimensionality. Only the scale extended by two items also offers a sufficient global fit and is thus most suitable as a predictor for psychological stress, work satisfaction, and satisfaction with the professional exchange during homeworking. CONCLUSIONS: With “DigiFuehr 2.0”, an improved version of the original scale is available. Self‐organization is not a component independent of the support dimension, but a further important indicator of a latent digital leadership culture. Neither should come at the expense of the other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9849427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98494272023-01-24 DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership Claassen, Kevin Rodil Dos Anjos, Dominique Kettschau, Jan Patrick Wrede, Sammy Joelle Shirley Broding, Horst Christoph J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Against the background of e‐government, it is discussed whether self‐organization represents an independent component of digital leadership. Addressing this research question, the instrument “DigiFuehr” is being expanded to include the aspects of self‐determination and coordination. The aim is to test the model quality of three adapted scales against the already established support‐focusing version. METHODS: Based on an online survey of n = 422 employees at visual display unit workstations in German municipal administrations in April 2022, the original version of DigiFuehr as well as one reduced and two extended versions were validated considering their local and global model fit. RESULTS: All four scales show a good local fit with regard to internal consistency (Cronbach's α), discriminatory power, and dimensionality. Only the scale extended by two items also offers a sufficient global fit and is thus most suitable as a predictor for psychological stress, work satisfaction, and satisfaction with the professional exchange during homeworking. CONCLUSIONS: With “DigiFuehr 2.0”, an improved version of the original scale is available. Self‐organization is not a component independent of the support dimension, but a further important indicator of a latent digital leadership culture. Neither should come at the expense of the other. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9849427/ /pubmed/36653825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12383 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Claassen, Kevin
Rodil Dos Anjos, Dominique
Kettschau, Jan Patrick
Wrede, Sammy Joelle Shirley
Broding, Horst Christoph
DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership
title DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership
title_full DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership
title_fullStr DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership
title_full_unstemmed DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership
title_short DigiFuehr 2.0: Novel insights for digital leadership
title_sort digifuehr 2.0: novel insights for digital leadership
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36653825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12383
work_keys_str_mv AT claassenkevin digifuehr20novelinsightsfordigitalleadership
AT rodildosanjosdominique digifuehr20novelinsightsfordigitalleadership
AT kettschaujanpatrick digifuehr20novelinsightsfordigitalleadership
AT wredesammyjoelleshirley digifuehr20novelinsightsfordigitalleadership
AT brodinghorstchristoph digifuehr20novelinsightsfordigitalleadership