Cargando…
Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study
Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false‐positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX‐Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to addre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23930 |
_version_ | 1784871966392451072 |
---|---|
author | Stolen, Craig Rosman, Jonathan Manyam, Harish Kwan, Brian Kelly, Jonathan Perschbacher, David Garner, John Richards, Mark |
author_facet | Stolen, Craig Rosman, Jonathan Manyam, Harish Kwan, Brian Kelly, Jonathan Perschbacher, David Garner, John Richards, Mark |
author_sort | Stolen, Craig |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false‐positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX‐Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to address these issues. Here, we present preliminary results from the trial focusing on the safety of ICM insertion, remote monitoring rates, and the feasibility of remote programming. LUX‐Dx PERFORM is a multicenter, prospective, single‐arm, post‐market, observational study with planned enrollment of up to 827 patients from 35 sites in North America. A preliminary cohort consisting of the first 369 patients who were enrolled between March and October 2021 was selected for analysis. Three hundred sixty‐three (363) patients had ICM insertions across inpatient and outpatient settings. The mean time followed was 103.4 ± 61.8 days per patient. The total infection rate was 0.8% (3/363). Interim results show high levels of remote monitoring with a median 94% of days with data transmission (interquartile range: 82–99). Thirteen (13) in‐clinic and 24 remote programming sessions were reported in 34 subjects. Reprogramming examples are presented to highlight signal quality, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the positive impact of remote programming on patient management. Interim results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM study demonstrate the safety of insertion, high data transmission rates, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the feasibility of remote programming to optimize arrhythmia detection and improve clinical workflow. Future results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM will further characterize improvements in signal quality and arrhythmia detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9849434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98494342023-01-24 Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study Stolen, Craig Rosman, Jonathan Manyam, Harish Kwan, Brian Kelly, Jonathan Perschbacher, David Garner, John Richards, Mark Clin Cardiol Clinical Trial Result Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false‐positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX‐Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to address these issues. Here, we present preliminary results from the trial focusing on the safety of ICM insertion, remote monitoring rates, and the feasibility of remote programming. LUX‐Dx PERFORM is a multicenter, prospective, single‐arm, post‐market, observational study with planned enrollment of up to 827 patients from 35 sites in North America. A preliminary cohort consisting of the first 369 patients who were enrolled between March and October 2021 was selected for analysis. Three hundred sixty‐three (363) patients had ICM insertions across inpatient and outpatient settings. The mean time followed was 103.4 ± 61.8 days per patient. The total infection rate was 0.8% (3/363). Interim results show high levels of remote monitoring with a median 94% of days with data transmission (interquartile range: 82–99). Thirteen (13) in‐clinic and 24 remote programming sessions were reported in 34 subjects. Reprogramming examples are presented to highlight signal quality, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the positive impact of remote programming on patient management. Interim results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM study demonstrate the safety of insertion, high data transmission rates, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the feasibility of remote programming to optimize arrhythmia detection and improve clinical workflow. Future results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM will further characterize improvements in signal quality and arrhythmia detection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9849434/ /pubmed/36208096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23930 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Result Stolen, Craig Rosman, Jonathan Manyam, Harish Kwan, Brian Kelly, Jonathan Perschbacher, David Garner, John Richards, Mark Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study |
title | Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study |
title_full | Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study |
title_fullStr | Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study |
title_short | Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study |
title_sort | preliminary results from the lux‐dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (lux‐dx perform) study |
topic | Clinical Trial Result |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stolencraig preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy AT rosmanjonathan preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy AT manyamharish preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy AT kwanbrian preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy AT kellyjonathan preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy AT perschbacherdavid preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy AT garnerjohn preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy AT richardsmark preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy |