Cargando…

Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study

Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false‐positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX‐Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to addre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolen, Craig, Rosman, Jonathan, Manyam, Harish, Kwan, Brian, Kelly, Jonathan, Perschbacher, David, Garner, John, Richards, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23930
_version_ 1784871966392451072
author Stolen, Craig
Rosman, Jonathan
Manyam, Harish
Kwan, Brian
Kelly, Jonathan
Perschbacher, David
Garner, John
Richards, Mark
author_facet Stolen, Craig
Rosman, Jonathan
Manyam, Harish
Kwan, Brian
Kelly, Jonathan
Perschbacher, David
Garner, John
Richards, Mark
author_sort Stolen, Craig
collection PubMed
description Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false‐positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX‐Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to address these issues. Here, we present preliminary results from the trial focusing on the safety of ICM insertion, remote monitoring rates, and the feasibility of remote programming. LUX‐Dx PERFORM is a multicenter, prospective, single‐arm, post‐market, observational study with planned enrollment of up to 827 patients from 35 sites in North America. A preliminary cohort consisting of the first 369 patients who were enrolled between March and October 2021 was selected for analysis. Three hundred sixty‐three (363) patients had ICM insertions across inpatient and outpatient settings. The mean time followed was 103.4 ± 61.8 days per patient. The total infection rate was 0.8% (3/363). Interim results show high levels of remote monitoring with a median 94% of days with data transmission (interquartile range: 82–99). Thirteen (13) in‐clinic and 24 remote programming sessions were reported in 34 subjects. Reprogramming examples are presented to highlight signal quality, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the positive impact of remote programming on patient management. Interim results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM study demonstrate the safety of insertion, high data transmission rates, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the feasibility of remote programming to optimize arrhythmia detection and improve clinical workflow. Future results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM will further characterize improvements in signal quality and arrhythmia detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9849434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98494342023-01-24 Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study Stolen, Craig Rosman, Jonathan Manyam, Harish Kwan, Brian Kelly, Jonathan Perschbacher, David Garner, John Richards, Mark Clin Cardiol Clinical Trial Result Despite the wide adoption of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs), high false‐positive rates, suboptimal signal quality, limited ability to detect atrial flutter, and lack of remote programming remain challenging. The LUX‐Dx PERFORM study was designed to evaluate novel technologies engineered to address these issues. Here, we present preliminary results from the trial focusing on the safety of ICM insertion, remote monitoring rates, and the feasibility of remote programming. LUX‐Dx PERFORM is a multicenter, prospective, single‐arm, post‐market, observational study with planned enrollment of up to 827 patients from 35 sites in North America. A preliminary cohort consisting of the first 369 patients who were enrolled between March and October 2021 was selected for analysis. Three hundred sixty‐three (363) patients had ICM insertions across inpatient and outpatient settings. The mean time followed was 103.4 ± 61.8 days per patient. The total infection rate was 0.8% (3/363). Interim results show high levels of remote monitoring with a median 94% of days with data transmission (interquartile range: 82–99). Thirteen (13) in‐clinic and 24 remote programming sessions were reported in 34 subjects. Reprogramming examples are presented to highlight signal quality, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the positive impact of remote programming on patient management. Interim results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM study demonstrate the safety of insertion, high data transmission rates, the ability to detect atrial flutter, and the feasibility of remote programming to optimize arrhythmia detection and improve clinical workflow. Future results from LUX‐Dx PERFORM will further characterize improvements in signal quality and arrhythmia detection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9849434/ /pubmed/36208096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23930 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Result
Stolen, Craig
Rosman, Jonathan
Manyam, Harish
Kwan, Brian
Kelly, Jonathan
Perschbacher, David
Garner, John
Richards, Mark
Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study
title Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study
title_full Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study
title_fullStr Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study
title_short Preliminary results from the LUX‐Dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (LUX‐Dx PERFORM) study
title_sort preliminary results from the lux‐dx insertable cardiac monitor remote programming and performance (lux‐dx perform) study
topic Clinical Trial Result
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36208096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23930
work_keys_str_mv AT stolencraig preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy
AT rosmanjonathan preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy
AT manyamharish preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy
AT kwanbrian preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy
AT kellyjonathan preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy
AT perschbacherdavid preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy
AT garnerjohn preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy
AT richardsmark preliminaryresultsfromtheluxdxinsertablecardiacmonitorremoteprogrammingandperformanceluxdxperformstudy