Cargando…

A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties

BACKGROUND: Creating a supportive environment for scientific research is vital to improve the quality of research and its impact on development of society. This study outlines the development of a new scale that can measure the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousef, Mohammad Ali, Dashash, Mayssoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12701
_version_ 1784872079079768064
author Yousef, Mohammad Ali
Dashash, Mayssoon
author_facet Yousef, Mohammad Ali
Dashash, Mayssoon
author_sort Yousef, Mohammad Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Creating a supportive environment for scientific research is vital to improve the quality of research and its impact on development of society. This study outlines the development of a new scale that can measure the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This tool aimed to allow medical institutions to measure their scientific research environment from the researchers' point of view. This may ensure an appropriate scientific research environment for researchers by identifying and overcoming obstacles. METHODS: Based on literature, an initial list with 58 items was formulated. After discussing with postgraduate students and academic staff members from Damascus University and the Syrian Virtual University, A 38-item scale remained from the initial list of 58 items. To test the scale, postgraduate medical students (n = 30) were asked to fill the scale and answer 38 questions-with a 5-point Likert scale-twice in two separate occasions. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was performed to study the internal correlation. The internal consistency test was performed with Cronbach's Alpha, and the Test-Retest Reliability was conducted to study the reliability of the scale. Moreover, factor analysis was used to determine the sampling adequacy. RESULTS: Thirty postgraduate medical students at Damascus University completed the 38-item scale. Scale scores in the sample displayed good reliability in relation to published results. Findings, showed an internal correlation among its sub-scales. The results showed an acceptable reliability values such as internal consistency (α = 0.863) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.093). KMO had a value bigger than 0.7 (KMO = 0.849) which indicate sampling adequacy, also, Bartlett's test of the sphericity was (1142.76, Df = 91, P-value = 0.000) which prove meaningful of the factor analysis. The results of varimax rotation found that five main factors were retained. CONCLUSIONS: The Scientific Research Environment Measure (SREM), can be suggested as an effective evaluation instrument which can be applied easily to assess the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This would help the decision makers to support teaching, learning, and research environment through implementing new strategies that inspire postgraduate medical students and increase their engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9849986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98499862023-01-20 A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties Yousef, Mohammad Ali Dashash, Mayssoon Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: Creating a supportive environment for scientific research is vital to improve the quality of research and its impact on development of society. This study outlines the development of a new scale that can measure the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This tool aimed to allow medical institutions to measure their scientific research environment from the researchers' point of view. This may ensure an appropriate scientific research environment for researchers by identifying and overcoming obstacles. METHODS: Based on literature, an initial list with 58 items was formulated. After discussing with postgraduate students and academic staff members from Damascus University and the Syrian Virtual University, A 38-item scale remained from the initial list of 58 items. To test the scale, postgraduate medical students (n = 30) were asked to fill the scale and answer 38 questions-with a 5-point Likert scale-twice in two separate occasions. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was performed to study the internal correlation. The internal consistency test was performed with Cronbach's Alpha, and the Test-Retest Reliability was conducted to study the reliability of the scale. Moreover, factor analysis was used to determine the sampling adequacy. RESULTS: Thirty postgraduate medical students at Damascus University completed the 38-item scale. Scale scores in the sample displayed good reliability in relation to published results. Findings, showed an internal correlation among its sub-scales. The results showed an acceptable reliability values such as internal consistency (α = 0.863) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.093). KMO had a value bigger than 0.7 (KMO = 0.849) which indicate sampling adequacy, also, Bartlett's test of the sphericity was (1142.76, Df = 91, P-value = 0.000) which prove meaningful of the factor analysis. The results of varimax rotation found that five main factors were retained. CONCLUSIONS: The Scientific Research Environment Measure (SREM), can be suggested as an effective evaluation instrument which can be applied easily to assess the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This would help the decision makers to support teaching, learning, and research environment through implementing new strategies that inspire postgraduate medical students and increase their engagement. Elsevier 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9849986/ /pubmed/36685438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12701 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Yousef, Mohammad Ali
Dashash, Mayssoon
A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_full A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_fullStr A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_full_unstemmed A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_short A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_sort suggested scientific research environment measure srem in medical faculties
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9849986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12701
work_keys_str_mv AT yousefmohammadali asuggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties
AT dashashmayssoon asuggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties
AT yousefmohammadali suggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties
AT dashashmayssoon suggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties