Cargando…

Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service

OBJECTIVE: The National Health Service (NHS) in England has introduced a range of policy measures aimed at fostering greater openness, transparency and candour about quality and safety. We draw on the findings of an evaluation of the implementation of these policies in NHS organisations, with the ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Graham, Chew, Sarah, McCarthy, Imelda, Dawson, Jeremy, Dixon-Woods, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13558196221109053
_version_ 1784872172791005184
author Martin, Graham
Chew, Sarah
McCarthy, Imelda
Dawson, Jeremy
Dixon-Woods, Mary
author_facet Martin, Graham
Chew, Sarah
McCarthy, Imelda
Dawson, Jeremy
Dixon-Woods, Mary
author_sort Martin, Graham
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The National Health Service (NHS) in England has introduced a range of policy measures aimed at fostering greater openness, transparency and candour about quality and safety. We draw on the findings of an evaluation of the implementation of these policies in NHS organisations, with the aim of identifying key implications for policy and practice. METHODS: We undertook a mixed-methods policy evaluation, comprising four substudies: a longitudinal analysis of data from surveys of NHS staff and service users; interviews with senior stakeholders in NHS provider organisations and the wider system; a survey of board members of NHS provider organisations and organisational case studies across acute, community and mental health, and ambulance services. RESULTS: Our findings indicate a mixed picture of progress towards improving openness in NHS organisations, influenced by organisational history and memories of past efforts, and complicated by organisational heterogeneity. We identify four features that appear to be necessary conditions for sustained progress in improving openness: (1) authentic integration into organisational mission is crucial in making openness a day-to-day concern; (2) functional and effective administrative systems are vital; (3) these systems must be leavened by flexibility and sensitivity in implementation and (4) a spirit of continuous inquiry, learning and improvement is required to avoid the fallacy that advancing openness can be reduced to a time-limited project. We also identify four persistent challenges in consolidating and sustaining improvement: (1) a reliance on goodwill and discretionary effort; (2) caring for staff, patients and relatives who seek openness; (3) the limits of values-driven approaches on their own and (4) the continued marginality of patients, carers and families. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in policy implementation offers important lessons on how organisations can better deliver openness, transparency and candour. These lessons highlight practical actions for policymakers, managers and senior clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9850378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98503782023-01-20 Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service Martin, Graham Chew, Sarah McCarthy, Imelda Dawson, Jeremy Dixon-Woods, Mary J Health Serv Res Policy Original Research OBJECTIVE: The National Health Service (NHS) in England has introduced a range of policy measures aimed at fostering greater openness, transparency and candour about quality and safety. We draw on the findings of an evaluation of the implementation of these policies in NHS organisations, with the aim of identifying key implications for policy and practice. METHODS: We undertook a mixed-methods policy evaluation, comprising four substudies: a longitudinal analysis of data from surveys of NHS staff and service users; interviews with senior stakeholders in NHS provider organisations and the wider system; a survey of board members of NHS provider organisations and organisational case studies across acute, community and mental health, and ambulance services. RESULTS: Our findings indicate a mixed picture of progress towards improving openness in NHS organisations, influenced by organisational history and memories of past efforts, and complicated by organisational heterogeneity. We identify four features that appear to be necessary conditions for sustained progress in improving openness: (1) authentic integration into organisational mission is crucial in making openness a day-to-day concern; (2) functional and effective administrative systems are vital; (3) these systems must be leavened by flexibility and sensitivity in implementation and (4) a spirit of continuous inquiry, learning and improvement is required to avoid the fallacy that advancing openness can be reduced to a time-limited project. We also identify four persistent challenges in consolidating and sustaining improvement: (1) a reliance on goodwill and discretionary effort; (2) caring for staff, patients and relatives who seek openness; (3) the limits of values-driven approaches on their own and (4) the continued marginality of patients, carers and families. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in policy implementation offers important lessons on how organisations can better deliver openness, transparency and candour. These lessons highlight practical actions for policymakers, managers and senior clinicians. SAGE Publications 2022-06-22 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9850378/ /pubmed/35732062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13558196221109053 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Martin, Graham
Chew, Sarah
McCarthy, Imelda
Dawson, Jeremy
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service
title Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service
title_full Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service
title_fullStr Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service
title_full_unstemmed Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service
title_short Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service
title_sort encouraging openness in health care: policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the english national health service
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13558196221109053
work_keys_str_mv AT martingraham encouragingopennessinhealthcarepolicyandpracticeimplicationsofamixedmethodsstudyintheenglishnationalhealthservice
AT chewsarah encouragingopennessinhealthcarepolicyandpracticeimplicationsofamixedmethodsstudyintheenglishnationalhealthservice
AT mccarthyimelda encouragingopennessinhealthcarepolicyandpracticeimplicationsofamixedmethodsstudyintheenglishnationalhealthservice
AT dawsonjeremy encouragingopennessinhealthcarepolicyandpracticeimplicationsofamixedmethodsstudyintheenglishnationalhealthservice
AT dixonwoodsmary encouragingopennessinhealthcarepolicyandpracticeimplicationsofamixedmethodsstudyintheenglishnationalhealthservice