Cargando…

Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalence of osteoporosis may differ between urban and rural populations. This study aimed to investigate the differences in BMD characteristics between urban and rural populations in Jiangsu, China. METHODS: A total of 2,711 participants aged 20 years and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Miao, Wan, Yanan, Liu, Gongwen, Gao, Yan, Pan, Xiaoqun, You, Wanxi, Yuan, Donglan, Shen, Jianxin, Lu, Junhua, Wang, Xia, Zheng, Gangfeng, Han, Zhiqiang, Li, Xinlin, Chen, Kai, Xing, Xiaoxi, Zhang, Dong, Weng, Chengwei, Wei, Qi, Zhang, Yongqing, Lin, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06147-w
_version_ 1784872205682737152
author Zheng, Miao
Wan, Yanan
Liu, Gongwen
Gao, Yan
Pan, Xiaoqun
You, Wanxi
Yuan, Donglan
Shen, Jianxin
Lu, Junhua
Wang, Xia
Zheng, Gangfeng
Han, Zhiqiang
Li, Xinlin
Chen, Kai
Xing, Xiaoxi
Zhang, Dong
Weng, Chengwei
Wei, Qi
Zhang, Yongqing
Lin, Hua
author_facet Zheng, Miao
Wan, Yanan
Liu, Gongwen
Gao, Yan
Pan, Xiaoqun
You, Wanxi
Yuan, Donglan
Shen, Jianxin
Lu, Junhua
Wang, Xia
Zheng, Gangfeng
Han, Zhiqiang
Li, Xinlin
Chen, Kai
Xing, Xiaoxi
Zhang, Dong
Weng, Chengwei
Wei, Qi
Zhang, Yongqing
Lin, Hua
author_sort Zheng, Miao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalence of osteoporosis may differ between urban and rural populations. This study aimed to investigate the differences in BMD characteristics between urban and rural populations in Jiangsu, China. METHODS: A total of 2,711 participants aged 20 years and older were included in the cross-sectional study. Multistage and stratified cluster random sampling was used as the sampling strategy. BMD was measured by the method of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data were collected through questionnaires/interview. BMD values at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, total hip, and greater trochanter were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate the characteristics of urban and rural participants. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to analyze the factors that may be associated with osteoporosis in urban and rural populations. RESULTS: Of these participants, 1,540 (50.49%) were females and 1,363 (42.14%) were from urban. The prevalence of osteoporosis in urban and rural populations was 5.52% and 10.33%, respectively. In terms of gender, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 2.68% in males and 13.82% in females. For menopausal status, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 30.34% in postmenopausal females and 4.78% in premenopausal females. In urban populations, older age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.36, 95%CI, 2.35–2.36), hypertension (AOR = 1.37, 95%CI, 1.36–1.37), unmarried (AOR = 4.04, 95%CI, 3.99–4.09), smoking everyday (AOR = 2.26, 95%CI, 2.23–2.28), family history of osteoporosis (AOR = 1.66, 95%CI, 1.65–1.67), dyslipidemia (AOR = 1.05, 95%CI, 1.04–1.05), and higher β-crosslaps (β-CTX) level (AOR = 1.02, 95%CI, 1.02–1.02) were associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, while males (AOR = 0.04, 95%CI, 0.04–0.04), higher education level (AOR = 0.95, 95%CI, 0.95–0.95), and aquatic product intake (AOR = 0.99, 95%CI, 0.99–0.99) were related to decreased risk of osteoporosis. Similar results were also observed in rural populations, and (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of osteoporosis in rural populations was higher than that in urban populations, and the factors associated with the risk of osteoporosis were similar in urban and rural populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06147-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9850530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98505302023-01-20 Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study Zheng, Miao Wan, Yanan Liu, Gongwen Gao, Yan Pan, Xiaoqun You, Wanxi Yuan, Donglan Shen, Jianxin Lu, Junhua Wang, Xia Zheng, Gangfeng Han, Zhiqiang Li, Xinlin Chen, Kai Xing, Xiaoxi Zhang, Dong Weng, Chengwei Wei, Qi Zhang, Yongqing Lin, Hua BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalence of osteoporosis may differ between urban and rural populations. This study aimed to investigate the differences in BMD characteristics between urban and rural populations in Jiangsu, China. METHODS: A total of 2,711 participants aged 20 years and older were included in the cross-sectional study. Multistage and stratified cluster random sampling was used as the sampling strategy. BMD was measured by the method of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data were collected through questionnaires/interview. BMD values at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, total hip, and greater trochanter were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate the characteristics of urban and rural participants. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to analyze the factors that may be associated with osteoporosis in urban and rural populations. RESULTS: Of these participants, 1,540 (50.49%) were females and 1,363 (42.14%) were from urban. The prevalence of osteoporosis in urban and rural populations was 5.52% and 10.33%, respectively. In terms of gender, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 2.68% in males and 13.82% in females. For menopausal status, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 30.34% in postmenopausal females and 4.78% in premenopausal females. In urban populations, older age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.36, 95%CI, 2.35–2.36), hypertension (AOR = 1.37, 95%CI, 1.36–1.37), unmarried (AOR = 4.04, 95%CI, 3.99–4.09), smoking everyday (AOR = 2.26, 95%CI, 2.23–2.28), family history of osteoporosis (AOR = 1.66, 95%CI, 1.65–1.67), dyslipidemia (AOR = 1.05, 95%CI, 1.04–1.05), and higher β-crosslaps (β-CTX) level (AOR = 1.02, 95%CI, 1.02–1.02) were associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, while males (AOR = 0.04, 95%CI, 0.04–0.04), higher education level (AOR = 0.95, 95%CI, 0.95–0.95), and aquatic product intake (AOR = 0.99, 95%CI, 0.99–0.99) were related to decreased risk of osteoporosis. Similar results were also observed in rural populations, and (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of osteoporosis in rural populations was higher than that in urban populations, and the factors associated with the risk of osteoporosis were similar in urban and rural populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06147-w. BioMed Central 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9850530/ /pubmed/36658540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06147-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zheng, Miao
Wan, Yanan
Liu, Gongwen
Gao, Yan
Pan, Xiaoqun
You, Wanxi
Yuan, Donglan
Shen, Jianxin
Lu, Junhua
Wang, Xia
Zheng, Gangfeng
Han, Zhiqiang
Li, Xinlin
Chen, Kai
Xing, Xiaoxi
Zhang, Dong
Weng, Chengwei
Wei, Qi
Zhang, Yongqing
Lin, Hua
Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study
title Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study
title_full Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study
title_short Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study
title_sort differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06147-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengmiao differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT wanyanan differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT liugongwen differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaoyan differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT panxiaoqun differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT youwanxi differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT yuandonglan differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT shenjianxin differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT lujunhua differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT wangxia differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhenggangfeng differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT hanzhiqiang differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT lixinlin differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT chenkai differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT xingxiaoxi differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhangdong differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT wengchengwei differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT weiqi differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhangyongqing differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy
AT linhua differencesintheprevalenceandriskfactorsofosteoporosisinchineseurbanandruralregionsacrosssectionalstudy