Cargando…

A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools

BACKGROUND: The benefits of enhancing practitioner empathy include better patient outcomes and improved job satisfaction for practitioners. Evidence suggests empathy can be taught and empathy is listed as an outcome for graduates in the General Medical Council requirements. Despite this, empathy tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Rachel, Ward, Andy, Norman, Robert I, Howick, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5
_version_ 1784872236226707456
author Winter, Rachel
Ward, Andy
Norman, Robert I
Howick, Jeremy
author_facet Winter, Rachel
Ward, Andy
Norman, Robert I
Howick, Jeremy
author_sort Winter, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefits of enhancing practitioner empathy include better patient outcomes and improved job satisfaction for practitioners. Evidence suggests empathy can be taught and empathy is listed as an outcome for graduates in the General Medical Council requirements. Despite this, empathy training is not mandatory on medical school curricula and the extent to which medical students are given empathy-specific training is unknown. AIM: To conduct a survey of empathy training currently offered to medical students in UK medical schools. METHODS: An invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all UK medical schools (n = 40). The survey was developed through a consultancy and pilot process to ensure validity and reliability. Questions explored what empathy-focused training is offered, and asked educators whether or not they believed that current provision of empathy training is sufficient. In parallel, medical school websites were searched to identify what information regarding empathy-focused training is described as being part of the degree course. Descriptive statistics were used to describe empathy training delivery from the results of the online materials survey and closed survey questions. Thematic analysis was used to explore free text comments. RESULTS: Response rate was 70% (28/40), with 28 medical schools included in the analysis. Twenty-six schools reported that their undergraduate curriculum included some form of empathy-focused training with variation in what, when and how this is delivered. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes with associated sub-themes: (i) empathy-focused training and development (considering where, when and how empathy training should be integrated); (ii) challenges presented by including empathy on the curriculum (considering the system, students and faculty). All schools agreed empathy training should be on the undergraduate curriculum. CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide survey of empathy-focused training at UK medical schools. While some form of empathy-focused training appears to be provided on the undergraduate curriculum at most UK medical schools, empathy is rarely specifically assessed. Most medical educators do not feel their school does enough to promote empathy and the majority would like to offer more. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9850684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98506842023-01-20 A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools Winter, Rachel Ward, Andy Norman, Robert I Howick, Jeremy BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The benefits of enhancing practitioner empathy include better patient outcomes and improved job satisfaction for practitioners. Evidence suggests empathy can be taught and empathy is listed as an outcome for graduates in the General Medical Council requirements. Despite this, empathy training is not mandatory on medical school curricula and the extent to which medical students are given empathy-specific training is unknown. AIM: To conduct a survey of empathy training currently offered to medical students in UK medical schools. METHODS: An invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all UK medical schools (n = 40). The survey was developed through a consultancy and pilot process to ensure validity and reliability. Questions explored what empathy-focused training is offered, and asked educators whether or not they believed that current provision of empathy training is sufficient. In parallel, medical school websites were searched to identify what information regarding empathy-focused training is described as being part of the degree course. Descriptive statistics were used to describe empathy training delivery from the results of the online materials survey and closed survey questions. Thematic analysis was used to explore free text comments. RESULTS: Response rate was 70% (28/40), with 28 medical schools included in the analysis. Twenty-six schools reported that their undergraduate curriculum included some form of empathy-focused training with variation in what, when and how this is delivered. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes with associated sub-themes: (i) empathy-focused training and development (considering where, when and how empathy training should be integrated); (ii) challenges presented by including empathy on the curriculum (considering the system, students and faculty). All schools agreed empathy training should be on the undergraduate curriculum. CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide survey of empathy-focused training at UK medical schools. While some form of empathy-focused training appears to be provided on the undergraduate curriculum at most UK medical schools, empathy is rarely specifically assessed. Most medical educators do not feel their school does enough to promote empathy and the majority would like to offer more. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5. BioMed Central 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9850684/ /pubmed/36658502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Winter, Rachel
Ward, Andy
Norman, Robert I
Howick, Jeremy
A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools
title A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools
title_full A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools
title_fullStr A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools
title_full_unstemmed A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools
title_short A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools
title_sort survey of clinical empathy training at uk medical schools
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5
work_keys_str_mv AT winterrachel asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools
AT wardandy asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools
AT normanroberti asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools
AT howickjeremy asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools
AT winterrachel surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools
AT wardandy surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools
AT normanroberti surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools
AT howickjeremy surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools