Cargando…
A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools
BACKGROUND: The benefits of enhancing practitioner empathy include better patient outcomes and improved job satisfaction for practitioners. Evidence suggests empathy can be taught and empathy is listed as an outcome for graduates in the General Medical Council requirements. Despite this, empathy tra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5 |
_version_ | 1784872236226707456 |
---|---|
author | Winter, Rachel Ward, Andy Norman, Robert I Howick, Jeremy |
author_facet | Winter, Rachel Ward, Andy Norman, Robert I Howick, Jeremy |
author_sort | Winter, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The benefits of enhancing practitioner empathy include better patient outcomes and improved job satisfaction for practitioners. Evidence suggests empathy can be taught and empathy is listed as an outcome for graduates in the General Medical Council requirements. Despite this, empathy training is not mandatory on medical school curricula and the extent to which medical students are given empathy-specific training is unknown. AIM: To conduct a survey of empathy training currently offered to medical students in UK medical schools. METHODS: An invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all UK medical schools (n = 40). The survey was developed through a consultancy and pilot process to ensure validity and reliability. Questions explored what empathy-focused training is offered, and asked educators whether or not they believed that current provision of empathy training is sufficient. In parallel, medical school websites were searched to identify what information regarding empathy-focused training is described as being part of the degree course. Descriptive statistics were used to describe empathy training delivery from the results of the online materials survey and closed survey questions. Thematic analysis was used to explore free text comments. RESULTS: Response rate was 70% (28/40), with 28 medical schools included in the analysis. Twenty-six schools reported that their undergraduate curriculum included some form of empathy-focused training with variation in what, when and how this is delivered. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes with associated sub-themes: (i) empathy-focused training and development (considering where, when and how empathy training should be integrated); (ii) challenges presented by including empathy on the curriculum (considering the system, students and faculty). All schools agreed empathy training should be on the undergraduate curriculum. CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide survey of empathy-focused training at UK medical schools. While some form of empathy-focused training appears to be provided on the undergraduate curriculum at most UK medical schools, empathy is rarely specifically assessed. Most medical educators do not feel their school does enough to promote empathy and the majority would like to offer more. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9850684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98506842023-01-20 A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools Winter, Rachel Ward, Andy Norman, Robert I Howick, Jeremy BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The benefits of enhancing practitioner empathy include better patient outcomes and improved job satisfaction for practitioners. Evidence suggests empathy can be taught and empathy is listed as an outcome for graduates in the General Medical Council requirements. Despite this, empathy training is not mandatory on medical school curricula and the extent to which medical students are given empathy-specific training is unknown. AIM: To conduct a survey of empathy training currently offered to medical students in UK medical schools. METHODS: An invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all UK medical schools (n = 40). The survey was developed through a consultancy and pilot process to ensure validity and reliability. Questions explored what empathy-focused training is offered, and asked educators whether or not they believed that current provision of empathy training is sufficient. In parallel, medical school websites were searched to identify what information regarding empathy-focused training is described as being part of the degree course. Descriptive statistics were used to describe empathy training delivery from the results of the online materials survey and closed survey questions. Thematic analysis was used to explore free text comments. RESULTS: Response rate was 70% (28/40), with 28 medical schools included in the analysis. Twenty-six schools reported that their undergraduate curriculum included some form of empathy-focused training with variation in what, when and how this is delivered. Thematic analysis revealed two overarching themes with associated sub-themes: (i) empathy-focused training and development (considering where, when and how empathy training should be integrated); (ii) challenges presented by including empathy on the curriculum (considering the system, students and faculty). All schools agreed empathy training should be on the undergraduate curriculum. CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide survey of empathy-focused training at UK medical schools. While some form of empathy-focused training appears to be provided on the undergraduate curriculum at most UK medical schools, empathy is rarely specifically assessed. Most medical educators do not feel their school does enough to promote empathy and the majority would like to offer more. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5. BioMed Central 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9850684/ /pubmed/36658502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Winter, Rachel Ward, Andy Norman, Robert I Howick, Jeremy A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools |
title | A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools |
title_full | A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools |
title_fullStr | A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools |
title_short | A survey of clinical empathy training at UK medical schools |
title_sort | survey of clinical empathy training at uk medical schools |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03993-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winterrachel asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools AT wardandy asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools AT normanroberti asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools AT howickjeremy asurveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools AT winterrachel surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools AT wardandy surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools AT normanroberti surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools AT howickjeremy surveyofclinicalempathytrainingatukmedicalschools |