Cargando…
Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines
BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is characterized by more local recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis than colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardized as there is no global consensus on its definition and classification. The classification of rectal cancer differs between Japane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683641 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284 |
_version_ | 1784872310003466240 |
---|---|
author | Miyakita, Hiroshi Kamei, Yutaro Chan, Lin Fung Okada, Kazutake Kayano, Hajime Yamamoto, Seiichiro |
author_facet | Miyakita, Hiroshi Kamei, Yutaro Chan, Lin Fung Okada, Kazutake Kayano, Hajime Yamamoto, Seiichiro |
author_sort | Miyakita, Hiroshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is characterized by more local recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis than colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardized as there is no global consensus on its definition and classification. The classification of rectal cancer differs between Japanese and Western guidelines. AIM: To clarify the characteristics of rectal cancer by comparing the tumor location and characteristics of rectal cancer with those of colon cancer according to each set of guidelines. METHODS: A total of 958 patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer were included in the analysis: 607 with colon cancer and 351 with rectal cancer. Localization of rectal cancers was assessed by enema examination and rigid endoscopy. According to Japan guidelines, rectal cancer is classified as Rb (below the peritoneal inversion), Ra (between the inferior margin of second sacral vertebrae and Rb) or RS (between Ra and sacral promontory). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between RS rectal cancer and colon cancer in the rates of liver and lung metastasis or LR. Lung metastasis and LR were significantly more common among Rb rectal cancer (in Japan) than in colon cancer (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Lung metastases and LR occurred at significantly higher rates in rectal cancer measuring ≤ 12 cm and ≤ 10 cm than in colon cancers (P = 0.0117, P = 0.0467, P = 0.0036, P = 0.0010). Finally, the rates of liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and LR in rectal cancers measuring 11 cm to 15 cm were 6.9%, 2.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. These were equivalent to the rates in colon cancer. CONCLUSION: High rectal cancer may be treated with the same treatment strategies as colon cancer. There was no difference in the classification of colorectal cancer between Japan and Western countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9850992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98509922023-01-20 Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines Miyakita, Hiroshi Kamei, Yutaro Chan, Lin Fung Okada, Kazutake Kayano, Hajime Yamamoto, Seiichiro World J Clin Cases Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is characterized by more local recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis than colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardized as there is no global consensus on its definition and classification. The classification of rectal cancer differs between Japanese and Western guidelines. AIM: To clarify the characteristics of rectal cancer by comparing the tumor location and characteristics of rectal cancer with those of colon cancer according to each set of guidelines. METHODS: A total of 958 patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer were included in the analysis: 607 with colon cancer and 351 with rectal cancer. Localization of rectal cancers was assessed by enema examination and rigid endoscopy. According to Japan guidelines, rectal cancer is classified as Rb (below the peritoneal inversion), Ra (between the inferior margin of second sacral vertebrae and Rb) or RS (between Ra and sacral promontory). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between RS rectal cancer and colon cancer in the rates of liver and lung metastasis or LR. Lung metastasis and LR were significantly more common among Rb rectal cancer (in Japan) than in colon cancer (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Lung metastases and LR occurred at significantly higher rates in rectal cancer measuring ≤ 12 cm and ≤ 10 cm than in colon cancers (P = 0.0117, P = 0.0467, P = 0.0036, P = 0.0010). Finally, the rates of liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and LR in rectal cancers measuring 11 cm to 15 cm were 6.9%, 2.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. These were equivalent to the rates in colon cancer. CONCLUSION: High rectal cancer may be treated with the same treatment strategies as colon cancer. There was no difference in the classification of colorectal cancer between Japan and Western countries. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-12-26 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9850992/ /pubmed/36683641 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Miyakita, Hiroshi Kamei, Yutaro Chan, Lin Fung Okada, Kazutake Kayano, Hajime Yamamoto, Seiichiro Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines |
title | Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines |
title_full | Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines |
title_fullStr | Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines |
title_short | Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines |
title_sort | classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of japanese guidelines and western guidelines |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683641 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyakitahiroshi classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines AT kameiyutaro classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines AT chanlinfung classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines AT okadakazutake classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines AT kayanohajime classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines AT yamamotoseiichiro classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines |