Cargando…

Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is characterized by more local recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis than colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardized as there is no global consensus on its definition and classification. The classification of rectal cancer differs between Japane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyakita, Hiroshi, Kamei, Yutaro, Chan, Lin Fung, Okada, Kazutake, Kayano, Hajime, Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683641
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284
_version_ 1784872310003466240
author Miyakita, Hiroshi
Kamei, Yutaro
Chan, Lin Fung
Okada, Kazutake
Kayano, Hajime
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
author_facet Miyakita, Hiroshi
Kamei, Yutaro
Chan, Lin Fung
Okada, Kazutake
Kayano, Hajime
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
author_sort Miyakita, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is characterized by more local recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis than colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardized as there is no global consensus on its definition and classification. The classification of rectal cancer differs between Japanese and Western guidelines. AIM: To clarify the characteristics of rectal cancer by comparing the tumor location and characteristics of rectal cancer with those of colon cancer according to each set of guidelines. METHODS: A total of 958 patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer were included in the analysis: 607 with colon cancer and 351 with rectal cancer. Localization of rectal cancers was assessed by enema examination and rigid endoscopy. According to Japan guidelines, rectal cancer is classified as Rb (below the peritoneal inversion), Ra (between the inferior margin of second sacral vertebrae and Rb) or RS (between Ra and sacral promontory). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between RS rectal cancer and colon cancer in the rates of liver and lung metastasis or LR. Lung metastasis and LR were significantly more common among Rb rectal cancer (in Japan) than in colon cancer (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Lung metastases and LR occurred at significantly higher rates in rectal cancer measuring ≤ 12 cm and ≤ 10 cm than in colon cancers (P = 0.0117, P = 0.0467, P = 0.0036, P = 0.0010). Finally, the rates of liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and LR in rectal cancers measuring 11 cm to 15 cm were 6.9%, 2.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. These were equivalent to the rates in colon cancer. CONCLUSION: High rectal cancer may be treated with the same treatment strategies as colon cancer. There was no difference in the classification of colorectal cancer between Japan and Western countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9850992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98509922023-01-20 Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines Miyakita, Hiroshi Kamei, Yutaro Chan, Lin Fung Okada, Kazutake Kayano, Hajime Yamamoto, Seiichiro World J Clin Cases Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is characterized by more local recurrence (LR) and lung metastasis than colon cancer. However, the diagnosis of rectal cancer is not standardized as there is no global consensus on its definition and classification. The classification of rectal cancer differs between Japanese and Western guidelines. AIM: To clarify the characteristics of rectal cancer by comparing the tumor location and characteristics of rectal cancer with those of colon cancer according to each set of guidelines. METHODS: A total of 958 patients with Stage II and III colorectal cancer were included in the analysis: 607 with colon cancer and 351 with rectal cancer. Localization of rectal cancers was assessed by enema examination and rigid endoscopy. According to Japan guidelines, rectal cancer is classified as Rb (below the peritoneal inversion), Ra (between the inferior margin of second sacral vertebrae and Rb) or RS (between Ra and sacral promontory). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between RS rectal cancer and colon cancer in the rates of liver and lung metastasis or LR. Lung metastasis and LR were significantly more common among Rb rectal cancer (in Japan) than in colon cancer (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Lung metastases and LR occurred at significantly higher rates in rectal cancer measuring ≤ 12 cm and ≤ 10 cm than in colon cancers (P = 0.0117, P = 0.0467, P = 0.0036, P = 0.0010). Finally, the rates of liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and LR in rectal cancers measuring 11 cm to 15 cm were 6.9%, 2.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. These were equivalent to the rates in colon cancer. CONCLUSION: High rectal cancer may be treated with the same treatment strategies as colon cancer. There was no difference in the classification of colorectal cancer between Japan and Western countries. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-12-26 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9850992/ /pubmed/36683641 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Miyakita, Hiroshi
Kamei, Yutaro
Chan, Lin Fung
Okada, Kazutake
Kayano, Hajime
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines
title Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines
title_full Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines
title_fullStr Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines
title_short Classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of Japanese guidelines and Western guidelines
title_sort classification of rectal cancer according to recurrence types - comparison of japanese guidelines and western guidelines
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683641
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13284
work_keys_str_mv AT miyakitahiroshi classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines
AT kameiyutaro classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines
AT chanlinfung classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines
AT okadakazutake classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines
AT kayanohajime classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines
AT yamamotoseiichiro classificationofrectalcanceraccordingtorecurrencetypescomparisonofjapaneseguidelinesandwesternguidelines